A SINGLE CENTER STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Post-PCNL complication; PCNL; Renal stone; Urosepsis
Abstract
Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a widely accepted minimally invasive procedure and is considered the benchmark treatment for renal stones, especially in cases involving larger or complex calculi. Its high success rate and reduced complication profile make it a preferred choice. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCNL in patients treated at Pakistan Kidney Center (PKC), Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Methodology: This prospective observational study was carried out over a period of 15 months from May 2021 to August 2022. A total of 100 patients who underwent PCNL at PKC for renal stone management were included. All patients provided informed consent and relevant clinical data were recorded using a structured proforma. Data were extracted from hospital records and analyzed for demographic details, stone location, puncture site, stone clearance rate, blood loss, and post-operative complications.
Results: The mean age of patients was 32.48 years, with an average stone size of 4.25 cm³. Of the total cases, 55% had stones in the left kidney, and 45% in the right kidney. Puncture was performed in the lower pole in 79% of cases, upper pole in 15%, and mid pole in 6%. A single puncture was sufficient in 93.5% of procedures. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 83% of patients. Post-operative complications included urosepsis in 5.8% of patients, one case requiring blood transfusion, and one case of pleural injury.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that PCNL is a highly effective and safe procedure for the management of renal stones when performed by experienced surgeons in a specialized center. The low complication rate and high stone clearance demonstrate its efficacy. Further multicenter comparative studies involving both government and private sector hospitals are recommended to validate these outcomes on a larger scale.
References
2. Ganpule AP, Vijayakumar M, Malpani A, Desai MR. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review. International Journal of Surgery. 2016 Dec 1;36:660-4.
3. Siener R. Nutrition and kidney stone disease. Nutrients. 2021 Jun 3;13(6):1917.
4. Kachkoul R, Touimi GB, El Mouhri G, El Habbani R, Mohim M, Lahrichi A. Urolithiasis: History, epidemiology, aetiologic factors and management. The Malaysian journal of pathology. 2023 Dec 1;45(3):333-52.
5. Karthik BR. Guys Stone Score and STONE Nephrolithometry Score Using Non-Enhanced Renal Computed Tomography to Predict the Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Doctoral dissertation, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India)).
6. Ahmad N, Rehman IU, Khan K, Javed ML, Faisal M, Naz R. The Impact of Lifestyle Factors on the Development of Kidney Stones: Lifestyle Factors on the Kidney Stones Development. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences. 2024 Nov 30:124-8.
7. MUSTAPHA AR. HEALTH IMPLICATIONS OF OXALATE CONSUMPTION: A.
8. Memon AA, Osama M, Wei CR, Rasool G, Bhurgri RS, Siyal DR, Siyal FJ. Common Health Challenges For Foreigners In Pakistan. Migration Letters: An International Journal of Migration Studies. 2024;21:131-42.
9. Khalil MA, Patujo YH, Ullah F, Ibrar U, Adil R, Inam QA, Zohaib M, Fatima A, Asif M, Afnan M, Inam Sr QA. An Analysis of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Performed at the Institute of Kidney Disease, Pakistan: Stone Clearance and Complications. Cureus. 2024 Dec 9;16(12).
10. Lokesh P. Abstracts-USICON 2019. Indian Journal of Urology. 2019 Jan 1;35(Suppl 1):S1-49.
11. Unverzagt S, Prondzinsky R, Peinemann F. Single-center trials tend to provide larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: a systematic review. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2013 Nov 1;66(11):1271-80.
12. Lokesh P. Abstracts-USICON 2019. Indian Journal of Urology. 2019 Jan 1;35(Suppl 1):S1-49.
13. Lane J, Whitehurst L, Hameed BZ, Tokas T, Somani BK. Correlation of operative time with outcomes of ureteroscopy and stone treatment: a systematic review of literature. Current urology reports. 2020 Apr;21:1-9.
14. Goel R, Mohan D, Guttikunda SK, Tiwari G. Assessment of motor vehicle use characteristics in three Indian cities. Transportation research part D: transport and environment. 2016 May 1;44:254-65.
15. Sahin OZ, Yavas H, Taslı F, Gibyeli DG, Ersoy R, Uzum A, Cirit M. Prognostic value of glomerular C4d staining in patients with IgA nephritis. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology. 2014 May 15;7(6):3299.
16. Mishra OP, Jain P, Srivastava P, Prasad R. Urinary N-acetyl-beta-D glucosaminidase (NAG) level in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Pediatric Nephrology. 2012 Apr;27:589-96.
17. Kamphuis GM, Baard J, Westendarp M, de la Rosette JJ. Lessons learned from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. World journal of urology. 2015 Feb;33:223-33.
18. Singh S, Wu T, Xie C, Vanarsa K, Han J, Mahajan T, Oei HB, Ahn C, Zhou XJ, Putterman C, Saxena R. Urine VCAM-1 as a marker of renal pathology activity index in lupus nephritis. Arthritis research & therapy. 2012 Aug;14:1-1.
19. Turna B, Umul M, Demiryoguran S, Altay B, Nazli O. How do increasing stone surface area and stone configuration affect overall outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?. Journal of endourology. 2007 Jan 1;21(1):34-43.
20. Hemmelgarn BR, Zhang J, Manns BJ, James MT, Quinn RR, Ravani P, Klarenbach SW, Culleton BF, Krause R, Thorlacius L, Jain AK. Nephrology visits and health care resource use before and after reporting estimated glomerular filtration rate. Jama. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1151-8.