COMPARISON OF LINEAR DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY BETWEEN ONE STEP AND TWO-STEP IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE

Main Article Content

Dr Rabia Anwar
Dr Faisal Hanif
Dr Shoaib Alvi
Dr Ayesha Bibi
Dr Abdullah Karamat
Dr Khizer Mehmood

Keywords

precision of dimensions, Polyvinyl siloxane Impression material, one-step and two-step techniques, Dental prosthetics.

Abstract

Introduction: It is particularly in restorative dentistry, where the first and most accurate impressions are essential in formulating dental prostheses. The objective of this research is to evaluate the level of linear dimensional accuracy for the one-step and the two-step impression techniques using the polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) material.


Objectives: The study aimed to assess the one step and two step impression techniques in terms of linear dimensional accuracy using polyvinyl siloxane material.


Materials and Methods:  Consequently, the present cross-sectional study was conducted at the Dentistry Department, Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, Pakistan, from 1st June, 2024 to 30th November 2024. A total of 30 participants were selected according to specific criteria. The two impression techniques for this study were one-step and two-step, using PVS material, and the linear dimensional accuracy was measured in three reference points. To compare the results between the two techniques, the results were subjected to paired t-tests.


Results: The outcomes demonstrated that there were little differences in the model's linear dimensional accuracy between the two approaches.  Additionally, although the variation was not significantly different, the one-step method was slightly more precise than the other approaches.


Conclusion: The outcome of the one step and two step impression procedure using the PVS material was in quite close agreement with each other.


 

Abstract 74 | pdf Downloads 24

References

1- Ghanem, R.G., 2024. Dimensional Accuracy Trueness Implant Impressions Polyvinyl Siloxane Vinyl Siloxane Ether. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry.
2- Khare, A., Somkuwar, K., Yadav, N.S., Saxena, A., Verma, K., Kashyap, R. and Khare, H., 2024. In vitro Evaluation of Implant Impression Techniques and Elastomeric Materials: A Comparative Dimensional Accuracy Study. Advances in Human Biology, 14(4), pp.352-356.
3- Elkawash, H., Aoun, S., Dauki, E. and Algundi, M., 2025. Dimensional Accuracy of Two Impression Materials Regarding Impression Technique and Pouring Time Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis. AlQalam Journal of Medical and Applied Sciences, pp.58-66.
4- Özsoy, H.E., Najafova, L., Boyacıoğlu, H. and Krtulmus, H., 2021. The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), pp.87-91.
5- PokhArkAr, A.B., PALEKAR, U.G.L., SArAf, V., VIKHE, D., BHIWAPURKAR, S.S. and MADANSHETTY, P., 2021. A Comparative Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Detail Reproduction for Polyvinyl Siloxane and Vinyl Siloxane Ether under Dry and Moist Condition-An In vitro Study. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 15(9).
6- Roberts, H., 2021. Three-dimensional Change of Elastomeric Impression Materials During the First 24 Hours: A Pilot Study. Operative Dentistry, 46(6), pp.E307-E316.
7- Sayed, M.E., AL-Makramani, B.M.A., Al-Sanabani, F.A. and Shaabi, F.I., 2021. Reliability of Multiple Pour between Two Classes of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials: A Preliminary Stereomicroscopic Study. King Khalid University Journal of Health Sciences, 6(2), pp.78-84.
8- Singer, L., Habib, S.I., Shalaby, H.E.A., Saniour, S.H. and Bourauel, C., 2022. Digital assessment of properties of the three different generations of dental elastomeric impression materials. BMC Oral Health, 22(1), p.379.
9- Bhatia, P., Madan, R., Ahmed, R., Jandial, S. and Hasan, S., 2023. Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of resultant casts obtained from different impression techniques: An in vitro study. International Journal of Oral Care and Research, 11(3), pp.61-69.
10- Apinsathanon, P., Bhattarai, B.P., Suphangul, S., Wongsirichat, N. and Aimjirakul, N., 2022. Penetration and tensile strength of various impression materials of vinylsiloxanether, polyether, and polyvinylsiloxane impression materials. European journal of dentistry, 16(02), pp.339-345.
11- Abdelhameed, S.A., Shalaby, Y.A. and El Halawani, M.T., 2021. Comparative assessment of dimensional stability of addition silicone impression under the effect of disinfection materials. Alexandria Dental Journal, 47(2), pp.140-6.
12- Zappi, A., Papazoglou, E. and Anagnostou, M., 2023. Is a Wiggling-Motion Modified Two-Step Impression Technique as Accurate as Conventional Techniques in Restorative Dentistry?. Dentistry Journal, 11(5), p.139.
13- Sayed, M.E., Alshehri, A.H., Al-Makramani, B.M., Al-Sanabani, F., Shaabi, F.I., Alsurayyie, F.H., Ahmed, W.M., Al-Mansour, H. and Jain, S., 2021. Accuracy of Master Casts Generated Using Conventional and Digital Impression Modalities: Part 1—The Half-Arch Dimension. Applied Sciences, 11(24), p.12034.
14- Kar, S., Tripathi, A., Singh, J. and Ramkumar, J., 2022. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials using 3D laser scanner. medical journal armed forces india, 78, pp.S55-S60.
15- Suwanwalaikorn, P. and Aimjirakul, N., 2021. Comparison of the Penetration Ability of Different Elastomeric Impression Materials Into a Three-dimensional Gingival Model (Doctoral dissertation, Srinakharinwirot University).

Most read articles by the same author(s)