EVALUATING SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK: A REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC AND PREDICTIVE TOOLS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Sepsis, septic shock, SOFA score, qSOFA score, Shock Index, modified SOFA score, Phoenix Sepsis Criteria
Abstract
Background: Sepsis remains a critical global health issue, contributing to up to 20% of all-cause deaths worldwide, especially within hospital settings. The complexity of sepsis, along with its progression to septic shock, necessitates effective screening and predictive tools for early identification and management.
Objective: This review evaluates the efficacy and utility of various screening and predictive tools used in sepsis and septic shock, including the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, quick SOFA (qSOFA) score, modified SOFA (mSOFA), and the Shock Index (SI).
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of current literature on these tools' performance in predicting mortality and assessing severity in sepsis. Key studies were analyzed to compare their sensitivity, specificity, and practical application in different clinical settings.
Results: The SOFA score, assessing six organ systems, has demonstrated high accuracy in predicting mortality and organ failure, with changes of 2 or more points indicating sepsis syndrome. The qSOFA score, while useful for rapid identification outside ICU settings, has shown variable sensitivity in diagnosing sepsis and predicting mortality. The SI and mSI have proven valuable in assessing shock severity and predicting hospital admission and mortality. Recent advances include the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria, which offer improved performance in pediatric sepsis identification.
Conclusion: Effective management of sepsis and septic shock relies on integrating multiple screening tools with continuous monitoring of organ functions. While the SOFA score remains a robust tool for assessing acute morbidity, the qSOFA, SI, and mSI scores provide additional insights for rapid triage and severity assessment. Future developments in sepsis criteria, such as the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria, hold promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
References
2. Yealy DM, Mohr NM, Shapiro NI, Venkatesh A, Jones AE, Self WH. Early care of adults with suspected sepsis in the emergency department and out-of-hospital environment: a consensus-based task force report. Ann Emerg Med. 2021; 78:1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.02.006.
3. Vakkalanka JP, Harland KK, Swanson MB, Mohr NM. Clinical and epidemiological variability in severe sepsis: an ecological study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72:741-5. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210501.
4. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
5. Moreno R, Rhodes A, Piquilloud L, et al. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score: has the time come for an update? Crit Care. 2023;27:15. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04290-9.
6. Raymond NJ, Nguyen M, Allmark S, Woods L, Peckler B. Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment sepsis score in an emergency department setting: retrospective assessment of prognostic value. Emerg Med Australas. 2019;31:339-46. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13154.
7. Emadi SA, Baradari AG, Charati JY, et al. SOFA and modified SOFA score for assessing outcomes among trauma patients in intensive care unit. Int J Surg Open. 2022;47:100559. doi: 10.1016/j.ijso.2022.100559.
8. Koch C, Edinger F, Fischer T, et al. Comparison of qSOFA score, SOFA score, and SIRS criteria for the prediction of infection and mortality among surgical intermediate and intensive care patients. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:63. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00343-y.
9. Talmor D, Jones AE, Rubinson L, Howell MD, Shapiro NI. Simple triage scoring system predicting death and the need for critical care resources for use during epidemics. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1251-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000262385.95721.CC.
10. Liu YC, Liu JH, Fang ZA, et al. Modified shock index and mortality rate of emergency patients. World J Emerg Med. 2012;3:114-7. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2012.02.006.
11. Singh A, Ali S, Agarwal A, Srivastava RN. Correlation of shock index and modified shock index with the outcome of adult trauma patients: a prospective study of 9860 patients. N Am J Med Sci. 2014;6:450-2. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.141632.
12. Font MD, Thyagarajan B, Khanna AK. Sepsis and septic shock - basics of diagnosis, pathophysiology and clinical decision making. Med Clin North Am. 2020;104:573-85. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2020.02.011.
13. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:840-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208623.
14. Gotts JE, Matthay MA. Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management. BMJ. 2016;353
. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1585.
15. Liu D, Huang SY, Sun JH, et al. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: mechanisms, diagnosis and current treatment options. Mil Med Res. 2022;9:56. doi: 10.1186/s40779-022-00422-y.
16. Joffre J, Hellman J, Ince C, Ait-Oufella H. Endothelial responses in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202:361-70. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201910-1911TR.
17. Giustozzi M, Ehrlinder H, Bongiovanni D, et al. Coagulopathy and sepsis: pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and treatment. Blood Rev. 2021;50:100864. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100864.
18. Salomão R, Ferreira BL, Salomão MC, Santos SS, Azevedo LC, Brunialti MK. Sepsis: evolving concepts and challenges. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2019;52
. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20198595.
19. Wasyluk W, Zwolak A. Metabolic alterations in sepsis. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2412. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112412.
20. Arora J, Mendelson AA, Fox-Robichaud A. Sepsis: network pathophysiology and implications for early diagnosis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2023;324 doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00003.2023.
21. Hotchkiss RS, Moldawer LL, Opal SM, Reinhart K, Turnbull IR, Vincent JL. Sepsis and septic shock. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16045. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.45.
22. Cecconi M, Evans L, Levy M, Rhodes A. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet. 2018;392:75-87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30696-2.
23. Althunayyan SM, Alsofayan YM, Khan AA. Shock index and modified shock index as triage screening tools for sepsis. J Infect Public Health. 2019;12:8226. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.05.002.
24. Berger T, Green J, Horeczko T, et al. Shock index and early recognition of sepsis in the emergency department: pilot study. West J Emerg Med. 2013;14:168-74. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2012.8.11546.
25. Balhara KS, Hsieh YH, Hamade B, Circh R, Kelen GD, Bayram JD. Clinical metrics in emergency medicine: the shock index and the probability of hospital admission and inpatient mortality. Emerg Med J. 2017;34:89-94. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205532.
26. Lanspa MJ, Brown SM, Hirshberg EL, Jones JP, Grissom CK. Central venous pressure and shock index predict lack of hemodynamic response to volume expansion in septic shock: a prospective, observational study. J Crit Care. 2012;27:609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.07.021.
27. Pramudyo M, Bijaksana TL, Yahya AF, Putra IC. Novel scoring system based on clinical examination for prediction of in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients: a retrospective cohort study. Open Heart. 2022;9
. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002095.
28. Jouffroy R, Pierre Tourtier J, Gueye P, et al. Prehospital shock index to assess 28-day mortality for septic shock. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38:1352-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.11.004.
29. Jayaprakash N, Gajic O, Frank RD, Smischney N. Elevated modified shock index in early sepsis is associated with myocardial dysfunction and mortality. J Crit Care. 2018;43:30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.019.
30. Zhang TN, Hao PH, Gao SY, Liu CF, Yang N. Evaluation of SI, MSI and DSI for very early (3-day) mortality in patients with septic shock. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27:227. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00857-y.
31. Lambden S, Laterre PF, Levy MM, Francois B. The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials. Crit Care. 2019;23:374. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-266
32. Innocenti F, Tozzi C, Donnini C, De Villa E, Conti A, Zanobetti M, Pini R. SOFA score in septic patients: incremental prognostic value over age, comorbidities, and parameters of sepsis severity. Intern Emerg Med. 2018;13:405-12. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1629-5.
33. Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R, Vattanavanit V. Comparison of the accuracy of three early warning scores with SOFA score for predicting mortality in adult sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to intensive care unit. Heart Lung. 2019;48:240-4. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.02.005.
34. • Peng Y, Zhang W, Xu Y, et al. Performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2021;39:501-10. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03183-2.
35. Wani ZA, Gulzar K, Yatoo H, Kole T. Validation of 'Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score' as a screening tool for early identification of sepsis patients in the emergency department. Cureus. 2023;15 doi: 10.7759/cureus.39251.
36. Maitra S, Som A, Bhattacharjee S. Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:1123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.032.
37. Baig MA, Sheikh S, Hussain E, Bakhtawar S, Subhan Khan M, Mujtaba S, Waheed S. Comparison of qSOFA and SOFA score for predicting mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock patients in the emergency department of a low middle income country. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18:148-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.002.
38. Schlapbach LJ, Watson RS, Sorce LR, et al. International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock. JAMA. 2024;331: 665-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0179.
39. Sanchez-Pinto LN, Bennett TD, DeWitt PE, et al. Development and validation of the Phoenix criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock. JAMA. 2024;331:675-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0196.