IMPACT OF GRAND MULTIPARITY ON MATERNAL AND FETAL HEALTH: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Main Article Content

Tayyaba Rashid
Azra Saeed Awan
Riffat Nawaz
Fouzia Saghir

Keywords

Grand multiparity, fetal and maternal outcome, Cesarian, Low birth weight, Postpartum hemorrhage.

Abstract

Background: Grand multiparity is the risk in pregnancy with increase maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Its prevalence is high among developing and under developed countries where mother- child health is neglected. Its risk factors have been identified but its impact on health outcomes of mother and child are still of concern.


Introduction: Grand multiparity has been considered an independent factor for increasing adverse outcome for both fetus and mother specially diabetes mellitus, antepartum hemorrhage, malpresentation, cesarean section rate, postpartum hemorrhage, iron deficiency anemia, and a high perinatal mortality rate.


Methodology: A descriptive cross sectional study was conducted on 500 pregnant females in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi. Study was carried out over a period of eight months from October 2019 to May 2020. After ethical approval from institute through purposive sampling data was collected among pregnant female fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Antenatal record was reviewed for any antenatal complications (like anemia, malpresentation and PIH). During labor patients were managed according to the unit protocol and portogram was used to monitor the progress of labor and like PPH, prolong labor, birth weight was measured. Data was analyzed for qualitative and quantitative variables, where age, gestational period and parity were presented with mean and standard deviation and percentage of C-section, postpartum hemorrhage, PIH, anemia, malpresentation and fetal outcome were analyzed. Chi- square test of significance( with p≤ 0.05) was used to determine the relation of grand parity with maternal and fetal outcome.


Results: Patients ranged between 25-45 years with mean age 36.59±4.12. Mean gestational age was 38.58±0.84 weeks. Majority of the patients were gravida 5-9. Pregnancy induced hypertension(PIH) developed in 123 patients, anemia in 197 patients (39.4%), malpresentation seen in 66 cases (13.2%), prolonged labor occurred in 35 cases (7%), Caesarean section was carried out in 189 cases (37.8%) while normal vaginal delivery observed in 311 patients (62.2%), Postpartum hemorrhage(PPH) seen in 53 patients (18%), macrosomia developed in 48 cases (9.6%). Stratification for age, gestational age and parity was carried out.


 


Conclusion: This study demonstrated that grand multiparity remains a major obstetrics problem. It is associated with pregnancy induced hypertension, anemia and cesarean section. In communities where large family is desirable it is important to address the value of family planning and conduction of meticulous antenatal care.

Abstract 91 | PDF Downloads 15

References

1. Dacheva T. 384 Great grand-multiparity. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2022;270.
2. Tariq R, Javed A, Noreen Z. COMPARISON OF OBSTETRICAL COMPLICATIONS IN
MULTIPARA AND GRAND MULTIPARA. International Journal of Medical Science And Diagnosis Research. 2020;4(11).
3. Solanke BL. Maternal socio-demographic factors associated with low parity and grand multiparity in Nigeria. Women Health. 2019;59(7).
4. Dasa TT, Okunlola MA, Dessie Y. Effect of grand multiparity on adverse maternal outcomes: A prospective cohort study. Front Public Health. 2022;10.
5. Alkwai H, Khan F, Alshammari R, Batool A, Sogeir E, Alenazi F, et al. The Association between Grand Multiparity and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Ha’il, Saudi Arabia. Children. 2023;10(9).
6. Recabo O, Gould AJ, Has P, Ayala NK, Kole-White MB, Danilack VA, et al. Are infants born to high-risk patients with grand multiparity at increased risk of adverse outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(1).
7. Handing G, Straneo M, Agossou C, Wanduru P, Kandeya B, Abeid MS, et al. Birth asphyxia and its association with grand multiparity and referral among hospital births: A prospective cross- sectional study in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(3).
8. Ajong AB, Agbor VN, Simo LP, Noubiap JJ, Njim T. Grand multiparity in rural Cameroon: Prevalence and adverse maternal and fetal delivery outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1).
9. Njoku CO, Abeshi SE, Emechebe CI. Grand Multiparity: Obstetric Outcome in Comparison with Multiparous Women in a Developing Country. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;07(07).
10. Bornstein E, Eliner Y, Chervenak FA, Grünebaum A. Concerning trends in maternal risk factors in the United States: 1989–2018. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;29–30.
11. Adugna DG, Worku MG. Maternal and neonatal factors associated with low birth weight among neonates delivered at the University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Front Pediatr. 2022;10.
12. Dyack C, Hughes PF, Simbakalia JB. Vaginal delivery in the grand multipara following previous lower segment cesarian section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 1997;23(2).
13. Buyuk GN, Kansu-Celik H, Kaplan ZAO, Kisa B, Ozel S, Engin-Ustun Y. Risk Factors for Intrapartum Cesarean Section Delivery in Low-risk Multiparous Women following at Least a Prior Vaginal Birth (Robson Classification 3 and 4). Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. 2021;43(6).
14. Yimer NB, Tenaw Z, Gedefaw A. PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN GRAND MULTIPAROUS WOMEN: DOES PARITY MATTER? A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Ethiopian Journal of
Reproductive Health. 2020;12(1).
15. Kaya Şenol D, Gözüyeşil E. Evaluation of the quality of sexual life and sexual function in women with grand multiparity. Health Care Women Int. 2023;
16. Mgaya AH, Massawe SN, Kidanto HL, Mgaya HN. Grand multiparity: Is it still a risk in pregnancy? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13.
17. Alsammani MA, Jafer AM, Khieri SA, Ali AO, Shaaeldin MA. Effect of Grand Multiparity on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Under 35 Years of Age: a Comparative Study. Med Arch. 2019;73(2).
18. Ronen JA, Castaneda K, Sadre SY. Early Accreta and Uterine Rupture in the Second Trimester. Cureus. 2018;
19. Yadav N, Damke S. Study of risk factors in children with birth asphyxia. Int J Contemp Pediatrics. 2017;4(2).
20. Abdelmageed E, Bahaeldin H, Nadiah A, Abdelbagi A, Duria R, Ishag A. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of grand multiparity in Khartoum, Sudan. Afr Health Sci. 2022;22.

21. Subba T, Singh B, Rentta M, Madhukumar A, Sarkar B, Das R. Effect of intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during and after caesarean section: a quasi-experimental study in RIMS, Manipur. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2023;12(5).