ISOLATION AND SCREENING OF YEAST STRAINS FOR BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION USING SUGAR MOLASSES AND LIGNOCELLULOSE BIOMASS

Main Article Content

Salma Rani
Aatif Amin
Abdul Khaliq
Aqsa Batool
Fahad Said Khan
Abdul Hamid
Muhammad Akram

Keywords

Yeast Strains, Bioethanol Production, Sugar Molasses, Lignocellulose, Biomass

Abstract

Ethanol is a highly useful hydrocarbon which is used extensively in major industrial and manufacturing processes. It is also used as fuel. Ethanol is mainly sourced from the fermentation of carbon-based feedstock by microorganisms such as yeasts, which can be found almost everywhere in the environment. In view of the anticipated shortage of the traditional supplies of fossil fuels, there is a great interest in the production of ethanol as an alternative biofuel in recent years. The main objective of this research work was to isolate and characterize stress tolerant and high potential ethanol producing yeast strains from various fruit juice. The potential yeast isolates capable of producing ethanol were isolated from rotten fruit juice samples of sugarcane, sweet lemon, grapes and guava and grown in YEPD medium. Six yeasts isolate S1, S2, Gr, M1, M2, and Gu were characterized based on morphological and physicochemical characters. Based on the morphological appearance of vegetative cells under microscope, colony character and physicochemical characters, the isolates were identified as yeast isolates. Selected yeast strains were checked for alcoholic fermentation using sugarcane molasses and organic kitchen wastes media. The fermentation of molasses was optimized with respect to pH, temperature and ethanol concentration. The results revealed the optimum condition was found as a 30°C, pH 6.0 and 5% ethanol for fermentation. Stress tolerance tests showed that the strains S1, S2 and Gr were found highly thermo-, pH- and ethanol-tolerant. Pycnometer and refractometer were used for estimating percentage of ethanol. Under optimized conditions, S1, Gu, Gr, S2, M1, and M2 produced 85% ,57%, 87%,47%, 60% and 70% of ethanol by using molasses. Kitchen- wastes resulted 53%, 25%, 43%, 42%, 59% and 37% ethanol production after 48 hours of fermentation by using yeast isolates S1, Gu, Gr, S2, M1, and M2. It was concluded that indigenous yeast isolates could be used for high production of bioethanol, spirit and industrial alcohol.

Abstract 153 | PDF Downloads 53

References

1. Dragos, Niculescu Kristin Michaelsen-Preusse , Ülkü Güner , René van Dorland , Corette J Wierenga , Christian Lohmann(2018) A BDNF-Mediated Push-Pull Plasticity Mechanism for Synaptic Clustering 8,:2063-2074
2. Dudley, Holly Jonas, Fred Nelson , Jeffrey Parrish , Aili Pyhälä g, Sue Stolton b, James E.M. Watson(2018). The essential role of other effective area-based conservation measures in achieving big bold conservation targets.
3. Gaurav, N., Sivasankari, S., Kiran, G. S., Ninawe, A., and Selvin, J. (2017). Utilization of bioresources for sustainable biofuels, a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 205-214
4. Jain, Sonal, Chouhan, Sheetal, Chavan, Kirti J., Singh, Pushpendra, Tiwari and Archana. (2014). Bioethanol production from waste paper sludge as a fermentation substrate by using xylose fermenting yeast, Edizioni Minerva Medica, 2, 228, 201.
5. Jeffries, T. W., Grigoriev, I., Grimwood, J., Aerts, A., and Salamov, A. (2007). Genomic sequence of the xylose fermenting, insect-inhabiting yeast, Pichia stipitis. Nature Biotechnology, 25, 319-326.
6. Kiran, B., Kumar, R. and Deshmukh, D. (2014). Perspectives of microalgal biofuels as a renewable source of energy. Energy Conversion Management, 88, 1228–1244
7. Lorenz, M.C., Pan, X., Harashima, T., Cardenas, M.E., Xue, Y., Hirsch, J.P., and Heitman, J. (2000). The G protein-coupled receptor Gpr1 is a nutrient sensor that regulates pseudohyphal differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics (in press).
8. Piotrowski, J.S., Zhang, Y., and Bates, D.M. (2014). Death by a thousand cuts, the challenges and diverse landscape of lignocellulosic hydrolysate inhibitors. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 90 -98.
9. Promon, S. K., Kamal, W., Rahman, S. S., Hossain, M. M., & Choudhury, N. (2018). Bioethanol production using vegetable peels medium and the effective role of cellulolytic bacterial (Bacillus subtilis) pre-treatment. F1000Research, 7.
10. Bakhiet, S. E., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2015). Production of bio-ethanol from molasses by Schizosaccharomyces species. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 7(1), 45-53.
11. Li, S. L., Nie, Z. Q., Tian, Y. T., & Liu, C. (2019). Liquid refractive index measurement system based on electrowetting lens. Micromachines, 10(8), 515.
12. Soares, Carlos, P., Oliveira and Marcio L.R. (2002). Equações para estimar a quantidade de carbono na parte aérea de árvores de eucalipto em viçosa, minas gerais, Sociedade de Investigações Florestais, Revasta Árvore, Viçosa-MG 26, 533- 539.
13. Storch, M., Erdenkäufer, S., Wensing, M., Will, S., Zigan, L. (2015). The Effect of Ethanol Blending on Combustion and Soot Formation in an Optical DISI Engine Using High-speed Imaging. Physics Procedia, 66, 77–80
14. Turner, D., Xu, H., Cracknell, R.F., Natarajan, V., Chen, X. (2011). Combustion performance of bio-ethanol at various blend ratios in a gasoline direct injection engine. Fuel 90, 19-26.
15. Volynets, B., Ein-Mozaffari, F., and Dahman, Y. (2017). Biomass processing into ethanol, pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation, rheology and mixing. Green Processing and Synthesis, 6, 1-22
16. Xie, D. (2017). Integrating Cellular and Bioprocess Engineering in the Non-Conventional Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica for Biodiesel Production. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.5, 65-69.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>