A Study on Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter in Neonates In Tertiary Care Centre In Maharashtra

Main Article Content

Kadam Radhika Umesh
Aundhakar C.D
K.Mahendranath
Rahul.S.S
Shreshta B R

Keywords

Blood, Infection, Tertiary, Peripherally, complication

Abstract

Background: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) have been extensively used in neonates for administration of total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Placement of a PICC is a potentially lifesaving treatment for neonates with poor peripheral venous access and intolerance to enteral nutrition.
Aims and Objectives: To study utility and complications of PICC along with evaluation of duration of catheter and all the possible factors involving removal of catheter in neonates admitted in NICU of Krishna Hospital, Karad, Maharashta.
Material and Methods: Study design: hospital based observational study. Sample size:47. Study setting: NICU of KRISHNA HOSPITAL, KARAD. Study period: February 2020 to August 2022. Data analysis: SPSS software using relevant statistical method. Descriptive statistics was performed in terms of mean, standard deviation, frequency and percentage. Analytical statistics was done to check the statistical significance.
Results: Total 47 PICC lines were inserted in 47 neonates. Out of 47 neonates with PICC line, 40% were term neonates and 60% were preterm neonates. Median gestational age for PICC line insertion is 30.85 weeks minimum being 26 weeks and maximum being 38 wks. Out of 42.6% were extremely low birth weight (ELBW) ,46.8% were very low birth weight (VLBW), 8.5%were low birth weight (LBW). Mean birth weight of the participants was 1.18 ± 0.32 kgs. In most of the cases PICC line was inserted at 1st attempt (80.8%). Majority of neonates (68.1%) received Infusion of IV fluids, Antibiotics and Aminoven. In most of the patients PICC line was inserted in right long saphenous vein (87.2%). Reason for removal of PICC line was due to achievement of full feed and weight gain (72.4%). The mean catheter duration in our study was 18 days. Total 16 complications were noted. Most common complication observed was Catheter Associated Blood Stream Infection in 14.9% patients followed by Necrotising enterocolitis in 6.3% patients. In our study, out 47 neonates with PICC line, 31 neonates (66%) with PICC line have no complication.Out of 47 patient, 39 neonates (83.1%) were discharged , 4 (8.5%) were expired, 2 (4.3%) were referred to higher center and LAMA each.
Conclusion: PICC line has become a vital mode of providing medication to neonates especially in extreme preterm neonates. Hence it is important to recognize its utility, complication, durability and factors involved in removal of catheter.

Abstract 222 | PDF Downloads 197

References

1. Cameron GS. Central venous catheters for children with malignant disease: Surgical issues. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 1987 Aug 1;22(8):702-4.
2. Chien LY, Macnab Y, Aziz K, Andrews W, McMillan DD, Lee SK, et al. Variations in central venous catheter-related infection risks among Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:505-11
3. van den Hoogen A, Brouwer MJ, Gerards LJ, Fleer A, Krediet TG. Removal of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters in neonates is associated with the occurrence of sepsis. Acta Paediatr 2008;97:1250-2
4. Purkayastha J, Supraja M, Lewis LE, Y RB.A Study on Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter in Infants in Tertiary Care Centre .2017 April;5(2):PO21-PO26.
5. Hoang V, Sills J, Chandler M, Busalani E, Clifton-Koeppel R, Modanlou HD. Percutaneously inserted central catheter for total parenteral nutrition in neonates: complications
rates related to upper versus lower extremity insertion. Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):e1152-9.
6. Neubauer AP. Percutaneous central IV access in the neonate: [13]Experience with 535 Silastic catheters. Acta Paediatrica. 1995;84:756–60.
7. Njere I, Islam S, Parish D, Kuna J, Keshtgar AS. Outcome of [18]peripherally inserted central venous catheters in surgical and medical neonates. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(5):946-50.
8. Pettit J. Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: part 1. Detecting the most frequently occurring complications. Adv Neonatal Care. 2002;2(6):304-315.
9. Altimer L, Brown B, Tedeschi L. Peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters: placement and maintenance. In: National Association of Neonatal Nurses. NANN Guidelines for Neonatal Nursing Policies, Procedures, Competencies and Clinical Pathways. 4th ed. Glenview, IL; 2006:140-5.
10. Wrightson DD. Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Jun;13(3):198-204.
11. Freeman J, Platt R, Epstein MF, Smith NE, Sidebottom DG, Goldmann DA. Birth weight and length of stay as determinants of nosocomial coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia in neonatal intensive care unit populations: potential for confounding. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(6):1130–1140.
12. Eichenwald EC.Cloherty and stark’s manual of neonatal care.8th ed.New delhi :Wolters Kluwer;2018.355 p).
13. Kambam K et al. A Prospective Study on Complications of Central Venous Access in Neonates in a Tertiary Care Hospital.Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research. 2021; 09:.1
14. Subhani MT, Dalal J, LaGamma EF. Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC)–related infections correlate with the degree of immaturity rather than operator defined risk factors. Pediatr Res 1998;43:197

Most read articles by the same author(s)