EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION IN METAL-CERAMIC VERSUS ALL-CERAMIC FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES USING CLINICAL METHODS

Main Article Content

Dr Pragya Bali
Dr Vyvika Chinthapally
Dr. Rahul Tiwari
Dr. Rahul Tiwari
Dr. Heena Dixit Tiwari
Dr. Akriti
Dr. Afroz Kalmee Syed Mahajan

Keywords

Marginal adaptation; Fixed partial denture; Metal-ceramic restoration; All-ceramic restoration; Zirconia FPD

Abstract

Background: Marginal adaptation is a critical determinant of the biological and mechanical success of fixed partial dentures (FPDs). While metal-ceramic FPDs have long been considered the clinical standard, advances in zirconia-based all-ceramic systems necessitate comparative clinical evaluation of marginal integrity using in vivo methods.


Aim: To clinically compare marginal adaptation of metal-ceramic and zirconia-based all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures using standardized clinical assessment methods over a 12-month period.


Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study included 60 patients requiring posterior three-unit FPDs, divided equally into metal-ceramic (Group MC) and all-ceramic zirconia-based (Group AC) groups. Standardized tooth preparation, impression, fabrication, and cementation protocols were followed. Marginal adaptation was evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria and the silicone replica technique for marginal gap measurement. Statistical analysis was performed with significance set at p<0.05.


Results: Both groups demonstrated clinically acceptable marginal adaptation throughout follow-up. USPHS scores showed no statistically significant intergroup differences at any interval. Mean marginal gap values increased over time in both groups; however, at 12 months, the all-ceramic group exhibited significantly lower marginal gaps compared to the metal-ceramic group (p=0.02). Clinical events such as sensitivity and gingival bleeding were infrequent and comparable.


Conclusion: Zirconia-based all-ceramic FPDs demonstrated marginal adaptation comparable to metal-ceramic FPDs, with superior quantitative marginal gap values at 12 months, supporting their clinical reliability in posterior applications.


 
Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in meassurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):405–408.
2. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinical significance of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54(5):695–700.
3. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kästner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(4):419–424.
4. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J. 1980;30(4):347–358.
5. United States Public Health Service. USPHS guidelines for clinical evaluation of dental restorations. Public Health Rep. 1971;86:25–32.
6. Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen J. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. Dent Mater. 2009;25(1):94–102.
7. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(4):383–388.
8. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(4):337–344.
9. Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JFL. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(6):369–379.
10. Abduo J, Lyons K. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42(2):122–137.
11. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131(3):107–111.
12. Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion. J Oral Rehabil. 1986;13(5):423–432.
13. Vigolo P, Fonzi F. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(2):88–94.
14. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures. J Dent. 2001;29(8):589–598.
15. Coli P, Karlsson S. Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(1):59–64.
16. Jacobs MS, Windeler AS. An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(3):436–442.
17. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Long-term effect of dentin primers on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent. 2000;13(2):79–84.
18. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(3):255–265.
19. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC. Mechanical properties of luting cements after water storage. Oper Dent. 2003;28(5):535–542.
20. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlays and onlays. J Prosthet Dent. 1966;16(2):297–305.
21. Manek P, Joshi R, Singh S. Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride on Surface Microhardness of Enamel. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2020;12(Suppl 1):S123–S128. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_197_20.
22. Manek P, Kumar R, Desai S. Alterations in Oropharyngeal Airway Volume Following Mandibular Anterior Repositioning. Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research. 2021;12(3):234–240. doi: 10.31838/jcdr.2021.12.03.32.
23. Manek P, Sharma N, Patel K. ADR Assessment and Prevention in Tertiary Hospital of India. AIJRRLSJM. 2021;4(1):89–95. doi: 10.22259/2639-6736.0401003.
24. Syed AK, Godavarthy DS, Kumar KK, Poosarla CS, Reddy GS, Reddy BV. Estimation of salivary superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase individuals with and without tobacco habits. J NTR Univ Health Sci 2021;10:27-32.
25. Suneetha M, Ramya A, Afroz Kalmee S. A fundamental change in approach in the dental and oral hygiene management in children during Covid 19 pandemic. IOSR JDMS (IOSR-JDMS). 2020;19(12):16-20.
26. Devi Priya B., Afroz Kalmee S., Omkar Danda E. B. ., & Dasarathi A. Root end filling material which is better in marginal adaptation? An invitro study. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies.2021;5(1):112-128. https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v5i1.1635