INCIDENCE AND PREVALANCE OF DISORDERS OF TOUNGE IN SUBURBAN POPULATION A CLINICAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Tongue disorders; Prevalence; Suburban population; Oral potentially malignant disorders; Tobacco use.
Abstract
Background: Tongue disorders encompass a wide range of conditions from benign anomalies to potentially malignant and malignant lesions. Their prevalence varies with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. Data on suburban populations remain limited, despite unique exposures to both rural and urban risk factors. Objective: To assess the incidence and prevalence of tongue disorders in a suburban Indian population and evaluate their associations with demographic, lifestyle, and systemic factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 500 participants attending a suburban dental outpatient department. Data on demographics, habits, and systemic health were collected using structured questionnaires. Clinical examinations followed WHO criteria. Prevalence and incidence were calculated, while associations were analyzed using chi-square tests and logistic regression. Results: The prevalence of tongue disorders was 36.2%. Fissured tongue (12.8%) and geographic tongue (8.2%) were most common, followed by glossitis (7.6%) and candidiasis (4.8%). Potentially malignant disorders (leukoplakia 2.8%, erythroplakia 0.6%) and squamous cell carcinoma (1.2%) were detected. Tobacco use (OR=3.5, p<0.001), betel quid chewing (OR=2.4, p=0.002), and anemia (OR=1.9, p=0.005) were significant predictors. Conclusion: Tongue disorders are prevalent in suburban communities, with both benign and potentially malignant lesions observed. Preventive oral health programs and routine screenings are vital for early detection.
References
2. Mathew AL, Pai KM, Sholapurkar AA, Vengal M. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in patients attending a dental school in Southern India. Indian J Dent Res. 2008;19(2):99–103.
3. Scully C, Porter S. Oral mucosal disease: recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46(3):198–206.
4. Kovac-Kovacic M, Skaleric U. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a population in Ljubljana, Slovenia. J Oral Pathol Med. 2000;29(7):331–5.
5. Shulman JD, Beach MM, Rivera-Hidalgo F. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in U.S. adults: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(9):1279–86.
6. Kovac-Kovacic M, Skaleric U. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a population in Ljubljana, Slovenia. J Oral Pathol Med. 2000;29(7):331–5.
7. Reichart PA. Oral mucosal lesions in a representative cross-sectional study of aging Germans. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000;28(5):390–8.
8. Pentenero M, Broccoletti R, Carbone M, Conrotto D, Gandolfo S. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in adults from the Turin area. Oral Dis. 2008;14(4):356–66.
9. Mehrotra R, Pandya S, Chaudhary AK, Kumar M, Singh M. Prevalence of oral potentially malignant and malignant lesions at a tertiary level hospital in Allahabad, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9(2):263–5.
10. Saraswathi TR, Ranganathan K, Shanmugam S, Sowmya R, Narasimhan PD, Gunaseelan R. Prevalence of oral lesions in relation to habits: cross-sectional study in South India. Indian J Dent Res. 2006;17(3):121–5.
11. Reddy V, Wanjari PV, Banda NR, Reddy P. Prevalence of tongue lesions in rural population of Andhra Pradesh, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(9):1529–33.
12. Patil S, Doni B, Kaswan S, Rahman F. Prevalence and distribution of tongue lesions in the Indian population. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5(3):e128–32.
13. Babu S, Sundaresan R, Kumar S. Prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders in India: a multicentre epidemiological study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017;21(3):394–400.
14. Mehrotra R, Gupta DK. Exciting new advances in oral cancer diagnosis: avenues to early detection. Head Neck Oncol. 2011;3(1):33.
15. Axéll T, Rundquist L. Oral leukoplakia: a follow-up study of 257 patients in Sweden. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987;15(4):211–4.
16. Shulman JD. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in children and youth in the USA. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15(2):89–97.
17. Martins MD, Marques AO, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KP, Martins MA. Clinical assessment of oral candidiasis in Brazilian adults. Rev Odonto Cienc. 2009;24(2):178–83.
18. van der Waal I. Potentially malignant disorders of the oral and oropharyngeal mucosa: present concepts of management. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(4–5):317–23.
19. World Health Organization. Oral health in South-East Asia Region: a situation analysis. New Delhi: WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2013.
20. Warnakulasuriya S. Smokeless tobacco and oral cancer. J Oral Pathol Med. 2002;31(6):319–28.
21. Manek P, Joshi R, Singh S. Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride on Surface Microhardness of Enamel. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2020;12(Suppl 1):S123–S128. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_197_20.
22. Manek P, Patel A, Gupta S. Nanodentistry: A Revolutionary Approach in Dental Sciences. Journal of Research and Advancement in Dentistry. 2020;10(2):56–62.
23. Manek P, Sharma P, Desai M. Relationship of BMI and Recurrent Aphthous Ulcer. Journal of Research and Advancement in Dentistry. 2020;10(1):34–39.
24. Manek P, Thakar S, Patel K. Prevalence and Patterns of Tobacco Use Among the Tribal Population of South Gujarat: A Cross-sectional Observational Study. Journal of Research and Advancement in Dentistry. 2020;10(4):23–29.
25. Suneetha M, Ramya A, Afroz Kalmee S. A fundamental change in approach in the dental and oral hygiene management in children during Covid 19 pandemic. IOSR JDMS (IOSR-JDMS). 2020;19(12):16-20.