ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS OF THE APPENDIX AND THEIR IMPACT ON DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING AND SURGICAL APPROACH
Main Article Content
Keywords
Appendix, Anatomical Variation, Retrocecal Appendix, Diagnostic Imaging, Appendectomy, Operative Time, Surgical Approach
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to determine the frequency of different anatomical positions of the appendix and evaluate their impact on imaging accuracy, operative difficulty, and postoperative outcomes.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Bannu Medical College, Bannu, from January 2024 to January 2025. Seventy-two patients undergoing appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis were enrolled through consecutive sampling. Demographic data, clinical presentation, imaging findings, and intraoperative observations regarding appendix position and length were recorded. Operative time, conversion rates, and postoperative complications were documented. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, with p<0.05 considered significant.
Results: The mean age of patients was 26.8 ± 8.4 years, with a slight male predominance (55.6%). Retrocecal position was the most frequent anatomical variant (41.7%), followed by pelvic (25%) and subcecal (13.9%). Ultrasound correctly identified appendix position in 80.6% of cases, with lower sensitivity for retrocecal appendices (p=0.02). Mean operative time was significantly longer for retrocecal appendices (p=0.04), but complication rates and hospital stay showed no statistically significant difference.
Conclusion: Anatomical variation of the appendix, particularly the retrocecal type, affects preoperative imaging accuracy and increases operative time but does not significantly influence postoperative morbidity. Awareness of these variations and appropriate imaging can enhance diagnostic accuracy and optimize surgical planning.
References
2. Kacprzyk, A., et al., Variations and morphometric features of the vermiform appendix: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 114,080 subjects with clinical implications. 2020. 33(1): p. 85-98.
3. Moris, D., E.K. Paulson, and T.N.J.J. Pappas, Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults: a review. 2021. 326(22): p. 2299-2311.
4. Hamid, M.A., et al., The importance of visualization of appendix on abdominal ultrasound for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children: A quality assessment review. 2020. 11(3): p. 140.
5. Banerjee, A., et al., Morphological variations in the anatomy of caecum and appendix-A cadaveric study. 2012. 1(1): p. 30-35.
6. Constantin, M., et al., The vermiform appendix and its pathologies. 2023. 15(15): p. 3872.
7. Alraddadi, A.J.C., Literature review of anatomical variations: clinical significance, identification approach, and teaching strategies. 2021. 13(4).
8. Nacenta, S.B., et al., Update on acute appendicitis: typical and untypical findings. 2023. 65: p. S81-S91.
9. Smith, H.F.J.T.A.R., A review of the function and evolution of the cecal appendix. 2023. 306(5): p. 972-982.
10. Hoffmann, J.C., et al., Classification of acute appendicitis (CAA): treatment directed new classification based on imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography) and pathology. 2021. 36(11): p. 2347-2360.
11. McDonald, S.J., et al., Fistulae involving the appendix: a systematic review of the literature. 2020. 90(10): p. 1878-1887.
12. Hodge, B.D., S. Kashyap, and A.J.S.T.I.S.P. Khorasani-Zadeh, Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis, appendix. 2023.
13. Echevarria, S., et al., Typical and atypical presentations of appendicitis and their implications for diagnosis and treatment: a literature review. 2023. 15(4).
14. Di Saverio, S., et al., Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. 2020. 15(1): p. 27.
15. Jedrzkiewicz, J., et al., Impact of referral center pathology review on diagnosis and management of patients with appendiceal neoplasms. 2020. 144(6): p. 764-768.
16. Dixon, F. and A.J.S. Singh, Acute appendicitis. 2020. 38(6): p. 310-317.
17. Zhang, L., et al., Disentangling human error from ground truth in segmentation of medical images. 2020. 33: p. 15750-15762.
18. Mansilla, L., D.H. Milone, and E.J.N.N. Ferrante, Learning deformable registration of medical images with anatomical constraints. 2020. 124: p. 269-279.
19. Alonizi, H.H., et al., Appendicitis in Pregnancy: An Updated Review for Healthcare Professionals and The Main Roles of Emergency Professionals. 2024. 3(8): p. 13238–13254-13238–13254.
20. Mohanty, S. and S.P.J.I.A. Dakua, Toward computing cross-modality symmetric non-rigid medical image registration. 2022. 10: p. 24528-24539.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Nabila Momin Khan
Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Rehman Medical College, Peshawar
Abdul Hafeez Khan
Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Bannu Medical College, Bannu
Saima Saleem
Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Federal Medical College, Islamabad
Wagma Sirshar
Resident Surgeon, Surgical C Unit, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar
Syed Muhammad Tahir Shah
Assistant Professor Department of Anatomy, Medical and Dental College at the Hills, Abbottabad
Zubeda Irshad
Assistant Professor Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Burns and Plastic Surgery Center MTI - HMC, Peshawar