OUTCOME OF EARLY REMOVAL OF URINARY CATHETER AFTER TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Outcome, Urinary catheter, Transurethral resection, Prostate
Abstract
Background: Transurethral resection of the prostate is still the gold standard for preventing complications. It has been the subject of ongoing discussion among urologists.
Objective: The aim of the study was to conclude the Outcome of early removal of urinary catheter after transurethral resection of prostate.
Material and method: This quasi-experimental study was carried out at the urology department MTI KGN Bannu KPK Pakistan from January-2024 to June-2024 after taking permission from the ethical board of the institute. 64 individuals with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who had bladder outlet obstruction were treated with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were included in the study. Group A (N=32) had been allocated to remove the catheters early (before forty-eight hours), and group B (N=32) to remove the catheters conventionally (between three to seven days). TURP was performed using an A26 Fr. Resectoscope using a continuous sheath (Storz). The removal of the catheter was dependent upon normal vital signs.
After TURP, the urethral catheter was withdrawn from group A within 48 hours and from group B within 3-5 days for those who satisfied the requirements for catheter removal. Urine samples were taken for sensitivity and culture in each patient right before the catheter was removed. At the 14th Postoperative day and one month, all patients were monitored for further clinical assessment. Data was analyzed through SPSS version 16 and represented in mean and standard deviation.
Results: For the research, 60 participants with benign prostate enlargement were chosen. All of them received TURP treatment, and 32 patients in Group A had their catheters removed in 48 hours, while 32 patients in Group B had their catheters removed in 3-5 days using a more conventional procedure. After catheter removal both groups revealed experienced hematuria which was not statistically noteworthy. Group A's post-operative hospital stay was 48.13 (±8.93) hours, whereas Group B's was 114.25 (±10.9) hours (p<0.001). This difference was statistically significant. Each participant was followed up on 14 Post -operative day Group A mean International Prostate Symptom Score, mean Post-Void Residual, and mean Qmax were calculated All differences were not statistically significant (p >0.05).
Conclusion: The study concluded that it is safe to remove a catheter early after transurethral resection of the prostate which also lowers postoperative hospital stays and catheter-related morbidity.
Objective: The aim of the study was to conclude the Outcome of early removal of urinary catheter after transurethral resection of prostate.
Material and method: This quasi-experimental study was carried out at the urology department MTI KGN Bannu KPK Pakistan from January-2024 to June-2024 after taking permission from the ethical board of the institute. 64 individuals with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who had bladder outlet obstruction were treated with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were included in the study. Group A (N=32) had been allocated to remove the catheters early (before forty-eight hours), and group B (N=32) to remove the catheters conventionally (between three to seven days). TURP was performed using an A26 Fr. Resectoscope using a continuous sheath (Storz). The removal of the catheter was dependent upon normal vital signs.
After TURP, the urethral catheter was withdrawn from group A within 48 hours and from group B within 3-5 days for those who satisfied the requirements for catheter removal. Urine samples were taken for sensitivity and culture in each patient right before the catheter was removed. At the 14th Postoperative day and one month, all patients were monitored for further clinical assessment. Data was analyzed through SPSS version 16 and represented in mean and standard deviation.
Results: For the research, 60 participants with benign prostate enlargement were chosen. All of them received TURP treatment, and 32 patients in Group A had their catheters removed in 48 hours, while 32 patients in Group B had their catheters removed in 3-5 days using a more conventional procedure. After catheter removal both groups revealed experienced hematuria which was not statistically noteworthy. Group A's post-operative hospital stay was 48.13 (±8.93) hours, whereas Group B's was 114.25 (±10.9) hours (p<0.001). This difference was statistically significant. Each participant was followed up on 14 Post -operative day Group A mean International Prostate Symptom Score, mean Post-Void Residual, and mean Qmax were calculated All differences were not statistically significant (p >0.05).
Conclusion: The study concluded that it is safe to remove a catheter early after transurethral resection of the prostate which also lowers postoperative hospital stays and catheter-related morbidity.
References
1. Roehrborn CG. (2012) Benign prostatic hyperplasia: Etiology, pathophysiology, epidemiology and Natural history, In: Wein AJ,Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters C.A.Campbell-Walsh’s Urology. 10th edition. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2571- 2610
2. Kacker R & Williams SB (201 1) Endourologic procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia: review of indications and outcomes; Urol J, 8(3): 171-6.
3. Fitzpatrick JM. (2012) minimally invasive and endoscopic management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW , Peters CA. Campbell- Walsh’s Urology .10th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2655-94.
4. Aslan G, Celebi I, Arslan D, Esen AA. (2002) Early catheter removal following transurethral prostatectomy: overnight catheterization; Urol Int, 68, 105–108.
5. Feldstein MS & Benson NA. (1988) Early catheter removal and reduced length of hospital stay following transurethral prostatectomy: a prospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients; J Urol, 140: 532-534.
6. Mueller EJ, Zeidmann EJ, Desmond PM,Thompson IM, Optenberg SA & Wasson J. (2003) Reduction of length of stay and cost of transurethral resection of the prostate by early catheter removal; Br J Urol, 78, 893–896.
7. Agarwal SK & Kumar AS. (1993) Early removal of catheter following transurethral resection of the prostate; Br J Urol, 72, 928–9
8. 8.Chalise PR, Agarwal CS & Pandit RK. (2010) Reduction of length of hospital stay after transurethral resection of prostate by early catheter removal: Aretrospective analysis; J Urol, 107, 131– 138.
9. Nakagawa T& T oguri AG. (2006) early catheter removal following transurethral prostatectomy: A study of 431 patients; Med Princ Pract15, 126-130.
10. 10.Iderpol L, T oscano JR, Maciel LC, Martins FG,Fernandes AR, Mello MF . (2001) Transurethralresection of the prostate: Prospective Randomized study of catheter removal after 24 hours or 48 hours following surgery; Braz J Urol, 27, 144-147
11. 11.Dodds L, Lawson PS, Crosthwaite AH & Well GR. (1995) Early catheter removal. Aprospective study of 100 consecutive patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate; Br J Urol, 75, 755–7.
12. Mamo GJ, & Cohen SP . (1991) Early catheter removal versus conventional practice in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate; J Urology, 37: 519–22.
13. Chander J, V anitha V , Lal P & Ramteke VK. (1992) Transurethral resection of the prostate as catheterfree day-care surgery; Br J Urol. 92, 422-425
2. Kacker R & Williams SB (201 1) Endourologic procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia: review of indications and outcomes; Urol J, 8(3): 171-6.
3. Fitzpatrick JM. (2012) minimally invasive and endoscopic management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW , Peters CA. Campbell- Walsh’s Urology .10th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2655-94.
4. Aslan G, Celebi I, Arslan D, Esen AA. (2002) Early catheter removal following transurethral prostatectomy: overnight catheterization; Urol Int, 68, 105–108.
5. Feldstein MS & Benson NA. (1988) Early catheter removal and reduced length of hospital stay following transurethral prostatectomy: a prospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients; J Urol, 140: 532-534.
6. Mueller EJ, Zeidmann EJ, Desmond PM,Thompson IM, Optenberg SA & Wasson J. (2003) Reduction of length of stay and cost of transurethral resection of the prostate by early catheter removal; Br J Urol, 78, 893–896.
7. Agarwal SK & Kumar AS. (1993) Early removal of catheter following transurethral resection of the prostate; Br J Urol, 72, 928–9
8. 8.Chalise PR, Agarwal CS & Pandit RK. (2010) Reduction of length of hospital stay after transurethral resection of prostate by early catheter removal: Aretrospective analysis; J Urol, 107, 131– 138.
9. Nakagawa T& T oguri AG. (2006) early catheter removal following transurethral prostatectomy: A study of 431 patients; Med Princ Pract15, 126-130.
10. 10.Iderpol L, T oscano JR, Maciel LC, Martins FG,Fernandes AR, Mello MF . (2001) Transurethralresection of the prostate: Prospective Randomized study of catheter removal after 24 hours or 48 hours following surgery; Braz J Urol, 27, 144-147
11. 11.Dodds L, Lawson PS, Crosthwaite AH & Well GR. (1995) Early catheter removal. Aprospective study of 100 consecutive patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate; Br J Urol, 75, 755–7.
12. Mamo GJ, & Cohen SP . (1991) Early catheter removal versus conventional practice in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate; J Urology, 37: 519–22.
13. Chander J, V anitha V , Lal P & Ramteke VK. (1992) Transurethral resection of the prostate as catheterfree day-care surgery; Br J Urol. 92, 422-425