MANAGEMENT OF OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: SURGERY VS. CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Osteoporosis, vertebral fractures, surgery, conservative treatment
Abstract
Background
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) affect significant numbers of the elderly population and results in pain, disability and decreased quality of life. It seems clear that management options, whether surgical or conservative, need to be optimized to change the natural history of the disease, reduce risk, and decrease the incidence of devastating complications.
Objectives
our study aims at comparing surgical management that encompasses both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty with conservative management to establish their efficiency in managing pain, mobility and quality of life amongst the patients.
Study Design : A Cross Sectional study.
Durtion and place and study. Department of orthopedic HMC Peshawar from July 2021 to Dec 2021
Methods
The current research is a cross-sectional, descriptive survey involving one hundred and fifty patients diagnosed with OVCFs. Patients were divided into two groups: 40 patients who had vertebral option fracture and 40 patients with pathological fracture received surgical management in the form of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty while 70 patients were managed conservatively using analgesia, braces, and physical therapies. Data on patients’ outcomes was gathered with the help of pain intensity scores, mobility rates and post-operative complications. All statistical analysis was done using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS 24.0), in order to establish the standard deviations and p-values.
Results
Surgical treatment significantly improved pain scores (VAS: 2.3 ± 0.8) as compared to conservative treatment VAS 4.1 ± 1.2) p < 0.01). Mobility indices were better in the surgical group (Mobility Score: 7.Far-progressive group had a higher Mobility score, 8 ± 1.1 compared with the conservative group, 6.4 ± 1.3 (p = 0.02). Major adverse events were not observed in both groups, but complication rates did not differ; 35% in either procedure group.
Conclusion
Self-report of pain and function suggests that surgical management for OVCFs offer better pain relief and functional outcome than conservative treatments; should therefore be preferred in patients with surgically amenable conditions. But patient-specific attributes and risk claims/criteria must remain the most decisive.
References
2. Cooper C, et al. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(3):S2-S8.
3. Jensen ME, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18(10):1897-1904.
4. Garfin SR, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26(14):1511-1515.
5. Firanescu CE, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Lancet. 2018;391(10129):1515-1523.
6. McGirt MJ, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: current controversies. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(5):785-795.
7. Klazen CA, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II). Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1085-1092.
8. Yang H, et al. A systematic review of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2013;38(11):E661-E668.
9. Wardlaw D, et al. Balloon kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Lancet. 2009;373(9668):1016-1024.
10. Liu JT, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine J. 2010;10(5):377-384.
11. Buchbinder R, et al. Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. NEJM. 2009;361(6):557-568.
12. Chang X, et al. Comparison of kyphoplasty and conservative treatment for OVCFs. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(7):E986-E992.
13. Yang H, et al. Complications of percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(10):3076-3082.
14. Rousing R, et al. Conservative treatment vs. vertebroplasty for acute OVCFs. Spine J. 2009;34(2):122-129.
15. Baaj AA, et al. Surgical versus conservative management of OVCFs. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12(3):360-367.
16. Wang H, et al. Comparison of surgical and conservative treatments for OVCFs. Spine. 2015;40(2):152-160.
17. Li X, et al. Adjacent segment fractures after vertebroplasty. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(3):847-855.
18. Lau E, et al. Long-term outcomes of kyphoplasty for OVCFs. J Orthop Surg. 2016;24(2):157-162.