ANALYSIS OF INTRACORONARY IMAGING-GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY STENTING VERSUS DRUG-COATED BALLOONS IN IMPROVING RECANALIZATION IN RESTENOSIS VESSELS

Main Article Content

Dr Muhammad Zubair Khan
Dr Muhammad Suleman Khan
Dr Muhammad Zafarullah
Dr Waqar Masud Malik
Dr Muhammad Navaid Iqbal
Dr Muhammad Hasnain Iqbal

Keywords

Intracoronary imaging-guided PCI, Restenosis, Recanalization

Abstract

Objectives:                                                                                                                 


To compare the efficacy of intracoronary imaging-guided percutaneous coronary stenting (PCI) versus drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in improving Recanalization in Restenosis Vessels.


Materials and Methods:  This RCT, approved by the hospital's ethical committee, involved 130 patients who provided informed consent. They were randomly assigned in a 1:1Muhammad hasnain iqbal


Senior registrar cardiology


Hbs medical and dental college islamabad ratio to either Group A (imaging-guided PCI) or Group B (DCB). Group A underwent PCI with stent placement guided by intracoronary imaging (IVUS or OCT) to ensure optimal stent placement, while Group B received angioplasty with a drug-coated balloon (paclitaxel or sirolimus) to minimize vessel injury. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 25.


Results: In this study of 130 patients (mean age 55.27±9.13 years), Group A had 52.3% males, while Group B had 55.4% males. Group A showed a lower target lesion revascularization rate (10.8% vs. 15.4%, p=0.43) and major adverse cardiac events rate (15.4% vs. 20.0%, p=0.49) compared to Group B. Group A also had significantly less late lumen loss (0.29±0.03 mm vs. 0.33±0.04 mm, p=0.00) and a lower rate of in-stent thrombosis (1.5% vs. 3.1%, p=0.55). Procedural success rates were 96.9% for Group A and 93.8% for Group B (p=0.40).


Conclusion: It was concluded that both intracoronary imaging-guided PCI and DCBs have distinct benefits in treating restenosis: imaging-guided PCI may be more effective for immediate recanalization, while DCBs are favorable for long-term restenosis prevention with a reduced risk of thrombotic complications. The choice between these strategies should be tailored to the patient's clinical profile, lesion characteristics, and the specific risks and benefits. Future research should include long-term randomized trials to further compare these approaches and enhance treatment guidelines.

Abstract 104 | pdf Downloads 34

References

Fortier JH, Ferrari G, Glineur D, Gaudino M, Shaw RE, Ruel M, et al. Implications of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention on disease progression and the resulting changes to the physiology and pathology of the native coronary arteries. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2018;54(5):809-16.
2. Kandaswamy E, Zuo L. Recent advances in treatment of coronary artery disease: role of science and technology. International journal of molecular sciences. 2018;19(2):424.
3. Acton QA. Restenosis: New Insights for the Healthcare Professional: 2013 Edition: ScholarlyEditions; 2013.
4. Gray WA, Granada JF. Drug-coated balloons for the prevention of vascular restenosis. Circulation. 2010;121(24):2672-80.
5. Giacoppo D, Alfonso F, Xu B, Claessen BE, Adriaenssens T, Jensen C, et al. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary stent restenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020;75(21):2664-78.
6. Darmoch F, Alraies MC, Al‐Khadra Y, Moussa Pacha H, Pinto DS, Osborn EA. Intravascular ultrasound imaging–guided versus coronary angiography–guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2020;9(5):e013678.
7. Giacoppo D, Cassese S, Harada Y, Colleran R, Michel J, Fusaro M, et al. Drug-coated balloon versus plain balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016;9(16):1731-42.
8. Gao X-F, Ge Z, Kong X-Q, Chen X, Han L, Qian X-S, et al. Intravascular Ultrasound vs Angiography-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty: The ULTIMATE Ⅲ Trial. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2024.
9. Abouelnour A, Gori T. Intravascular imaging in coronary stent restenosis: Prevention, characterization, and management. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022;9:843734.
10. Leimgruber PP, Roubin GS, Hollman J, Cotsonis GA, Meier B, Douglas JS, et al. Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease. Circulation. 1986;73(4):710-7.
11. Beatt KJ, Serruys PW, Luijten HE, Rensing BJ, Suryapranata H, de Feyter P, et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: the paradox of increased lumen diameter and restenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1992;19(2):258-66.
12. Richards G, Johnson T. A vision of percutaneous coronary revascularisation in 2021: how to take advantage of intra-coronary imaging to perform more effective PCI. JRSM Cardiovascular Disease. 2021;10:20480040211049978.
13. Truesdell AG, Alasnag MA, Kaul P, Rab ST, Riley RF, Young MN, et al. Intravascular imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention: JACC state-of-the-art review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023;81(6):590-605.
14. Zhang D-M, Chen S. In‐Stent Restenosis and a Drug‐Coated Balloon: Insights from a Clinical Therapeutic Strategy on Coronary Artery Diseases. Cardiology Research and Practice. 2020;2020(1):8104939.
15. Jeger RV, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad WA, Ge J, Poerner TC, Shin E-S, et al. Drug-coated balloons for coronary artery disease: third report of the international DCB consensus group. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2020;13(12):1391-402.
16. Cao Z, Li J, Fang Z, Feierkaiti Y, Zheng X, Jiang X. The factors influencing the efficiency of drug-coated balloons. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022;9:947776.

Most read articles by the same author(s)