EVALUATING PCI EFFICACY IN MULTI-VESSEL CAD: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Coronary artery disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Multi-vessel CAD, Quality of life, Angina, Rehospitalization, Adverse events
Abstract
Objective: This prospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy of PCI in patients with multi-vessel CAD, focusing on improvements in quality of life and reduction in angina episodes. Secondary objectives include assessing rehospitalization rates and the incidence of adverse events within six months post-PCI.
Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD) from January 2020 to December 2022. The study included 303 participants diagnosed with multi-vessel CAD, aged 40-89 years, who underwent PCI. Primary outcomes measured were quality of life and angina episodes, assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) pre- and Post-PCI. Secondary outcomes included rehospitalization rates and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0, with paired t-tests employed to compare pre- and Post-PCI outcomes. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The baseline characteristics of the study population showed a mean age of 65.4 years, with a majority being male (63.4%). Post-PCI, there was a significant improvement in the quality of life score, with a mean increase of 15.3 points and a median improvement of 16.0. Additionally, the mean number of angina episodes decreased from 5.2 pre-PCI to 1.4 post-PCI. Figure 1 illustrates the significant improvement in quality of life scores post-PCI, depicting a noticeable upward trend across the cohort.
Rehospitalization within the first six months Post-PCI was observed in 8.6% of participants. Minor complications occurred in 4.3% of patients, while major complications were noted in 1.3%.
Conclusion: The study demonstrates that PCI significantly improves the quality of life and reduces angina episodes in patients with multi-vessel CAD. These findings support the integration of PCI into treatment protocols for this patient population, offering substantial clinical benefits. Further research is warranted to explore long-term outcomes and refine patient selection criteria to optimize treatment strategies.
References
2. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87-165. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
3. Stone GW, Kandzari DE, Mehran R, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main and/or three-vessel coronary artery disease: the EXCEL trial. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(23):2223-2235. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1610227.
4. Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(40):2821-2830. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213.
5. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Fusaro M, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials. Circulation. 2012;125(23):2873-2891. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097014.
6. Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, et al. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(18):1718-1727. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1100452.
7. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503-1516. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070829.
8. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Morice MC, et al. Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions in the SYNTAX trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43(5):1006-1013. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezt386.
9. Banning AP, Westaby S, Morice MC, et al. Diabetic and nondiabetic patients with left main and/or 3-vessel coronary artery disease: comparison of outcomes with cardiac surgery and paclitaxel-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(11):1067-1075. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.065.
10. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(10):961-972. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0804626.
11. Claessen BE, Smits PC, Kereiakes DJ, et al. Impact of lesion complexity and operator technique on outcomes with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent: insights from the TWENTE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(12):1147-1156. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1172.
12. Guo LW, Zhou YQ, Yang Q, et al. Impact of pre-PCI fractional flow reserve on clinical outcomes in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130360.
13. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):991-1001. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1205361.
14. Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, et al. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2503-2515. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0805796.