ETIOLOGY AND ANTIBIOGRAM ASSAY OF URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN DIABETIC PATIENTS

Main Article Content

Imran Khan
Kainat
Faryal Gohar
Jamil Ahmad
Muhammad Ahtisham Azhar
Haris Khan
Saira Bano
Tanzeel Quddus
Madeha Maqsood

Keywords

Diabetes, Urinary tract infections, Antibiogram, Antibiotic resistance

Abstract

 


ABSTRACT


Background: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) has become an important international health issue and a substantial financial burden for poor countries. Urinary tract infection (UTI) is among the most prevalent health issues experienced in any age group of patients with diabetic complications. Individuals with diabetes have a higher risk of UTIs than people without the disease.


Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the etiology and antibiogram assay of urinary tract infection in diabetic patients


Material and Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out at the Department of Medicine Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar from March 2023 to March 2024. A total of 240 participants including both diabetics and non-diabetics were included. Patients whose urine sample had not shown growth on two samples or were already on antibiotic therapy were excluded. Urine cultures having   10 5 CFU or more were included. For each growth positive specimen of uropathogens, drug sensitivity testing was performed using the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique. The software Stata 12.0 (College Station, Texas, USA) was used to perform the necessary statistical analysis.


Results: Overall there were 240 patients in our study. Amongst the diabetic patients, 81 were male and 34 were female while in non-diabetics participants there were 70 male and 55 females. Patients with diabetes had an average age was 52.9 ± 9.1 years, while individuals without diabetes had an average age of 53.1 ± 8.6 years.  Among all, the most prevalent uropathogen was Escherichia coli (56.8%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.2%). Participants with diabetes were shown to have comparatively higher prevalence of Proteus Spp and Pseudomonas spp. The patterns of antimicrobial sensitivity in both groups were in decreasing order of susceptibility: 95 percent compared to 100% colistin > Amikacin (84% compared 85%) > Piperacillin/Tazobactam (78% compared to 85%) > Meropenem (93% versus 98%) > Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (87% versus 86%)


Conclusion: In our study the most prevalent bacteria was found to be E.coli in both groups followed by K. pneumoniae. Participants with diabetes were shown to have comparatively higher prevalence of Proteus Spp and Pseudomonas Spp. Between the two groups; there was no discernible variation in the patterns of antibiotic sensitivity.

Abstract 211 | pdf Downloads 37

References

1. Ijaz M, Ali I, Hussain A. Diabetes mellitus in Pakistan: the past, present, & future. Int J Diabetes Developing Countries. 2020;40(1):153–154. doi: 10.1007/s13410-019-00754-x
2. Basit A, Fawwad A, Qureshi H, Shera A. Prevalence of diabetes, pre-diabetes and associated risk factors: second National Diabetes Survey of Pakistan (NDSP), 2016-2017. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e020961. doi: 10.1136/ bmjopen-2017-020961
3. Sewify M, Nair S, Warsame S, Murad M, Alhubail A, Behbehani K, et al. Prevalence of urinary tract infection and antimicrobial susceptibility among diabetic patients with controlled and uncontrolled glycemia in Kuwait. J Diabetes Res. 2016; 2016:Article ID 6573215
4. Nitzan O, Elias M, Chazan B, Saliba W. Urinary tract infections in patients with Type-2 diabetes mellitus: review of prevalence, diagnosis, and management. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2015; 8:129-136. doi: 10.2147/DMSO. S51792
5. Bashir H, Saeed K, Jawad M. Causative agents of urinary tract infection in diabetic patients and their pattern of antibiotic susceptibility. Khyber Med Univ J. 2017;9(4):201-204.
6. Hamdan HZ, Kubbara E, Adam AM, Hassan OS, Suliman SO, Adam I. Urinary tract infections and antimicrobial sensitivity among diabetic patients at Khartoum, Sudan. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2015;14(1):26.
7. Zubair KU, Shah AH, Fawwad A, Sabir R, Butt A. Frequency of urinary tract infection and antibiotic sensitivity of uropathogens in patients with diabetes. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(6):1664-1668
1. 8 . Stapleton A. Urinary tract infections in patients with diabetes. Am J Med 2002; 113:S80-4
2. 9.Geerlings SE. Urinary tract infections in patients with diabetes mellitus: Epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008;31(Suppl 1):S54-7.
3. 10. Colgan R, Nicolle LE, McGlone A, Hooton TM. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Am Fam Physician 2006;74:985-90.
4. 11. Zhanel GG, Nicolle LE, Harding GK. Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and associated host factors in women with diabetes mellitus. The Manitoba Diabetic Urinary Infection Study Group. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:316-22.
5. 12. Al-Rubeaan KA, Moharram O, Al-Naqeb D, Hassan A, Rafiullah MR. Prevalence of urinary tract infection and risk factors among Saudi patients with diabetes. World J Urol 2013;31:573-8
6. 13 -Rubeaan KA, Moharram O, Al-Naqeb D, Hassan A, Rafiullah MR. Prevalence of urinary tract infection and risk factors among Saudi patients with diabetes. World J Urol 2013;31:573-8.
7. 14 .Kiranmala K, Johnson R, Savio J, Idiculla J. Microbiologic profile and clinical practices in urinary tract infections in a tertiary care center in Southern India. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:2888-92.
8. 15. Sandinti D, Lakshmaiah V, Natarajan A, Prabhakar K, Raveesha A. Clinical and microbiological profile of type 2 diabetic patients with urinary tract infections. Int J Res Med Sci 2020;8:954-9.
9. 16. Vinod CSS, Nareddy VA, Nagabhushana MV. A clinical study of urinary tract infections in diabetics and non-diabetics patients. Int J Adv Med 2019; 6:1421-9
10. 17. Vinod CSS, Nareddy VA, Nagabhushana MV. A clinical study of urinary tract infections in diabetics and non-diabetics patients. Int J Adv Med 2019; 6:1421-9

Most read articles by the same author(s)