SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF DEGENERATIVE LUMBER SCOLIOSIS

Main Article Content

Dr.Mahmoud kamel Elawady
Dr. Rasha Abdelhamid Zaki
Dr.Mohammed Melegy Rabie
Dr. Mahmoud Faried bathalla
Dr. Rabab Yahya AbdAl-kareem
Dr. Mostafa Gamaleldin Zahr
Dr. Samy Ibrahim kamel

Keywords

Cobb angle, Degenerative lumber scoliosis, Management, Outcomes, RMDQ

Abstract

Background: Surgically treating degenerative lumber scoliosis (DLS) alleviates radiating pain and claudication and corrects deformity. In DLS, the key pathophysiological idea to understand is the unequal degradation of discs and facet joints, resulting in a gradual imbalance in the spine's sideways curvature under pressure. Additional complications in the pathophysiology of adult degenerative scoliosis encompass the thickening of the ligamentum flavum, loosening of the interspinous ligament, and the progression towards spinal instability. This work aimed to evaluate the surgical intervention outcomes in DLS.


Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 30 individuals aged ≥ 51 years with DLS abnormalities identified using clinical examination, radiography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and one month postoperatively using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ).


Results: The mean estimated blood loss was 475.2± 197.5 ml. Regarding complications, wound infection occurred in 1 (3.33%) patient; incidental durotomy occurred in 3 (10%) patients; postoperative hematoma occurred in 2 (6.67%) patients; and neurological deficit did not occur in any patient. The mean hospital stays were 3.9± 1.05 days. The mean estimated blood loss was 475.2± 197.5 ml. Cobb angle and RMDQ showed significant improvement after treatment.


Conclusions: Surgical management of DLS exhibited significant improvement with low complications and short hospital stays. In DLS the Cobb angle assumes a less prominent position compared to idiopathic curves, and factors such as lateral listhesis, spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and sagittal imbalance carry equal, if not greater, role.

Abstract 49 | Pdf Downloads 8

References

1. Thomas K, Wong KH, Steelman SC, Rodriguez A. Surgical risk assessment and prevention in elderly spinal deformity patients. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019;10:2151459319851681.
2. Lee BH, Moon SH, Suk KS, Kim HS, Yang JH, Lee HM. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Pathophysiology and Treatment Principle: A Narrative Review. Asian Spine J. 2020;14:682-93.
3. Oskouian RJ, Jr., Shaffrey CI. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2006;17:299-315, vii.
4. Blamoutier A, Guigui P, Charosky S, Roussouly P, Chopin D. Surgery of lumbar and thoracolumbar scolioses in adults over 50. Morbidity and survival in a multicenter retrospective cohort of 180 patients with a mean follow-up of 4.5years. OTSR. 2012;98:528-35.
5. Wang G, Hu J, Liu X, Cao Y. Surgical treatments for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a meta analysis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1792-9.
6. Wewel JT, Godzik J, Uribe JS. The utilization of minimally invasive surgery techniques for the treatment of spinal deformity. J Spine Surg. 2019:84-90.
7. Kim HJ, Yang JH, Chang DG, Suk SI, Suh SW, Song KS, et al. Adult spinal deformity: Current concepts and decision-making strategies for management. Asian Spine J. 2020;14:886-97.
8. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Kim SS, Lee TJ, et al. Short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:650-6.
9. Liu W, Chen XS, Jia LS, Song DW. The clinical features and surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a review of 112 patients. Orthop Surg. 2009;1:176-83.
10. Ding JZ, Kong C, Sun XY, Lu SB. Perioperative complications and risk factors in degenerative lumbar scoliosis surgery for patients older than 70 years of age. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:2195-03.
11. Kersten R, Fikkers J, Wolterbeek N, Öner FC, van Gaalen SM. Are the roland morris disability questionnaire and oswestry disability index interchangeable in patients after lumbar spinal fusion? J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34:605-11.
12. Dru AB, Lockney DT, Vaziri S, Decker M, Polifka AJ, Fox WC, et al. Cervical spine deformity correction techniques. Neurospine. 2019;16:470-82.
13. Ailon T, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Lenke LG, Brodke D, Harrop JS, et al. Degenerative spinal deformity. J Neurosurg. 2015;77:75-91.
14. Ploumis A, Transfledt EE, Denis F. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. The Spine Journal. 2007;7:428-36.
15. Terran J, McHugh BJ, Fischer CR, Lonner B, Warren D, Glassman S, et al. Surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity: projected cost effectiveness at 5-year follow-up. Ochsner Journal. 2014;14:14-22.
16. Senkoylu A, Cetinkaya M. Correction manoeuvres in the surgical treatment of spinal deformities. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2:135-40.
17. Lebel A, Lebel VA. Severe progressive scoliosis in an adult female possibly secondary thoracic surgery in childhood treated with scoliosis specific Schroth physiotherapy: Case presentation. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016;11:41.
18. Liu G, Tan JH, Ee G, Chan YH, Low SL, Wong HK. Morphology and prevalence study of lumbar scoliosis in 7,075 multiracial asian adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:1307-12.
19. Di Silvestre M, Lolli F, Greggi T, Vommaro F, Baioni A. Adult's degenerative scoliosis: Midterm results of dynamic stabilization without fusion in elderly patients-is it effective? Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:365059.
20. Wang YX, Griffith JF, Zeng XJ, Deng M, Kwok AW, Leung JC, et al. Prevalence and sex difference of lumbar disc space narrowing in elderly chinese men and women: osteoporotic fractures in men (Hong Kong) and osteoporotic fractures in women (Hong Kong) studies. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1004-10.
21. Menezes-Reis R, Bonugli GP, Salmon CEG, Mazoroski D, Herrero C, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. Relationship of spinal alignment with muscular volume and fat infiltration of lumbar trunk muscles. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0200198.
22. Di Silvestre M, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients: dynamic stabilization without fusion versus posterior instrumented fusion. Spine J. 2014;14:1-10.
23. Di Silvestre M, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G, Parisini P. Dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients. Spine J. 2010;35:227-34.
24. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton W, et al. Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:86-93.
25. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton W, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of leg pain in adults with scoliosis: a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database with two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:1693-8.
26. Li G, Passias P, Kozanek M, Fu E, Wang S, Xia Q, et al. Adult scoliosis in patients over sixty-five years of age: outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment at a minimum two-year follow-up. Spine. 2009;34:2165-70.
27. Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, et al. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:2171-8.
28. Bettany-Saltikov J, Turnbull D, Ng SY, Webb R. Management of spinal deformities and evidence of treatment effectiveness. Open Orthop J. 2017;11:1521-47.
29. Silva FE, Lenke LG. Adult degenerative scoliosis: evaluation and management. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E1.
30. Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Coonrad RW. Degenerative adult onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13:241-5.