Main Article Content

Nadir Farid
Khurram Shehzad
Muhammad Hassaan Amjad
Imtiaz Ali Langah
Nasir Bakhtiar
Ahmad Arsalan Tahir
Muhammad Rashid Waheed




Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the best quality level in the treatment of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. In the predominant majority, cholecystectomy is a straightforward method and the classic model of laparoscopic surgery with low dismalness, short hospitalization, and speedy reconvalescence.

Objectives: The main objective of the study is to find the single incision laparoscopic surgery in cholecystectomy and its current trends and challenges.

Methodology of the study: This retrospective study analysis was conducted at Ayub teaching  hospital Abbottabad from January 2022 to December 2023. Data were collected from 210 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeryin cholecystectomy. Data collection involved retrieving comprehensive information on patient demographic, preoperative assessment and postoperative outcomes. Demographic data such as age, gender, and comorbidities were recorded. Preoperative evaluations, including imaging studies, ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, liver function tests, bilirubin levels and indications for surgery were documented.

Results: Data were collected from 210 patients. Mean age pf the patients were 45.21±9.87 years. There were 140 female and 70 male patients. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity which was 50 (23.8%), DM 25 (11.9%) and obesity 35 (16.7%).The results indicate that laparoscopic cholecystectomy was predominantly performed for symptomatic gallstone disease, accounting for 85.7% of cases, with acute cholecystitis comprising 14.3% of indications. Ultrasound was universally utilized for preoperative imaging, while magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was employed in 23.8% of cases, suggesting its selective use for assessing biliary anatomy.

Conclusion: It is concluded that laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a safe and effective treatment option for symptomatic gallstone disease, offering favorable outcomes in terms of operative efficiency and postoperative recovery

Abstract 232 | PDF Downloads 20


1. Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecysitits. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25:55–72.
2. Loozen CHS, Blessing MM, van Ramshorst B, van Santvoort HC, Boerma D. The optimal treatment of patients with mild and moderate acute cholecystitis: time for a revision of the Tokyo Guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3858–63.
3. Blohm M, Österberg J, Sandblom G, et al. The sooner, the better? The importance of optimal timing of cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: data from the national Swedish registry for gallstone surgery, gallRiks. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(1):33–40.
4. Da Costa DW, Schepers NJ, Bouwense SA, et al. Predicting a difficult cholecystectomy after mild gallstone pancreatitis. HPB. 2019;21(7):827–33.
5. Gad EH, Ayoup E, Kamel Y, et al. Surgical management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) related major bile duct injuries; predictors of short-and long-term outcomes in a tertiary Egyptian center—a restrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg. 2018;36:219–30.
6. Kawamoto Y, Fujikawa T, Sakamoto Y, et al. Effect of antithrombic therapy on bleeding complications in patients receiving emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(11):518–26.
7. Gregori M, Miccini M, Biacchi D, et al. Dy case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safety an feasibility in obese patients. Int J Surg. 2018;49:22–6.
8. Morcos R, Oliveira Souza Lima S, Bokhari S, et al. (February 19, 2024) A Comprehensive Analysis of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions. Cureus 16(2): e54493. doi:10.7759/cureus.54493
9. Malladad NS, Kulkarni: A comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional laparoscopic instruments versus multiple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int Surg J. 2018, 5:3562-9. 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20184623
10. Hajong R, Hajong D, Natung T, Anand M, Sharma G: A comparative study of single incision versus conventional four ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016, 10:PC06-9. 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19982.8601
11. Evers L, Bouvy N, Branje D, Peeters A: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017, 31:3437-48. 10.1007/s00464-016-5381-0
12. Lunevicius R. Cholecystectomy: Advances and Issues. J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3534. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123534. PMID: 35743604; PMCID: PMC9224629.
13. Manatakis, D. K., Antonopoulou, M. I., Tasis, N., Agalianos, C., Tsouknidas, I., Korkolis, D. P., &Dervenis, C. (2023). Critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of current evidence and future perspectives. World Journal of Surgery, 47(3), 640-648.
14. Lunevicius, R. (2022). Cholecystectomy: advances and issues. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(12), 3534.
15. Wang, W., Sun, X., & Wei, F. (2021). Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review. Updates in Surgery, 73(6), 2039-2046.
16. Sevik, H., Karsidag, T., & Tatar, C. (2024). A narrative review of technical developments for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery, 9.
17. Basunbul, L. I., Alhazmi, L. S. S., Almughamisi, S. A., Aljuaid, N. M., Rizk, H., Moshref, R., &Alhazmi, L. (2022). Recent technical developments in the field of laparoscopic surgery: a literature review. Cureus, 14(2).
18. Boyd, K., Bradley, N. A., Cannings, E., Shearer, C., Wadhawan, H., Wilson, M. S., & Crumley, A. (2022). Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy; change in practice over a 10-year period. Hpb, 24(5), 759-763.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>