EVALUATION OF THE MARGINAL DISCREPANCY ON IMPLANT ABUTMENTS WITH CROWNS FABRICATED BY CAD/CAM TECHNOLOGY

Main Article Content

Mohammad Abid
Utpalendu Biswas
Md. Masudur Rahman
Md. Mahbubur Rahman
Rajib Kumar Banik
Mozammal Hossain

Keywords

Marginal discrepancy, Marginal gap, Marginal irregularity, CAD/CAM system, implant abutment.

Abstract

This was an experimental in vitro study using CAD/CAM-fabricated implant abutments and crowns. For mandibular first molars, a total of twenty-five implant analogs measuring 4.3 mm in diameter, 10 mm in length, and 5.5 mm in height were obtained for the straight abutment. Using CAD/CAM technology, 25 first molar crowns were created on these implant abutments. Following the cementation of crowns on implant abutments, caries exploration was used to assess the marginal irregularity. Using a stereomicroscope, marginal gaps were assessed on twelve sites on the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal surfaces. Data were gathered on data collecting sheets following evaluation. With SPSS, statistical analysis was carried out. A percentage was used to express marginal irregularity. The marginal gaps were compared using the Friedman Test. According to the findings, every specimen had a score of 0 (smooth probing, no abnormalities), meaning that there were no marginal irregularities in any of the specimens. On all surfaces, the marginal gaps ranged from 2.99 to 29.03µm. The buccal surface had the largest mean ± Sd value of the marginal gap, 9.897±5.755 µm, while the distal surface had the lowest, 6.719±2.419 µm. 7.816±3.873 µm was the total Mean ±SD of the marginal gap. Between the Buccal-lingual and Buccal-Distal groups, there were observed to be significantly different marginal gaps. The area of the crown margin was responsible for varied marginal gaps, and it can be stated that the marginal gaps detected in CAD/CAM manufactured crowns on dental implant abutments were within a clinically acceptable range.

Abstract 25 | PDF Downloads 18

References

1. White SN, Ingles S, Kipnis V. Influence of marginal opening on microleakage of cemented artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Mar; 71(3):257-64.
2. Holmes J, Bayne S, Holland G, et al. Considerations in measurements of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:405.
3. Felton D, Kenoy B, Bayne S, et al. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:357-364.
4. Kerschbaum T. Practical test of crowns and inlays [Die praktische Bewährung von Krone und Inlay].Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1981;36:243.
5. Erpenstein H, Kerschbaum T, Fischbach H. Retention period and clinical findings of fixed restorations [Verweildauer und klinische Befunde bei Kronen und Brücken]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1992; 47:315-319
6. Walton J, Gardner F, Agar J. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56:416-421.
7. Jacobs M, Windeler A. An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:436-442.
8. Yildirim, Zeynep & Ünver, Senem. Etiology of Secondary Caries in Prosthodontic Treatments. 2018; 10
9. Att W, Komine F, Gerds T, Strub JR. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2009; 101:239-247
10. Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen J. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. Dental Materials. 2009; 25:94-102
11. Yüksel, Ece & Zaimoğlu, Ali. Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems. Brazilian oral research. 2011; 25. 261-6.
12. Bajoghli, F., Nosouhian, S., Badrian, H., Goroohi, H., Saberian, A., & Gadesi, L. Effect of base metal alloys recasting on marginal integrity of castable crowns. The journal of contemporary dental practice. 2013; 14(2), 255–258.
13. Gonzalo E, Suarez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2009; 22:374-377
14. Adel F. Ibraheem1, Lena S. Abdullah2. Evaluation of Post Cementation Marginal Seating of Monolithic Zirconia Crown Restorations Using Different Preparation Designs (A comparative in vitro study). Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2020; 14(1), 787–792.
15. Beuer F, Neumeier P, Naumann M. Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2009; 36:142-149
16. Tsirogiannis, P., Reissmann, D. R., & Heydecke, G. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2016; 116(3), 328–335.e2.
17. Homsy, F. R., Özcan, M., Khoury, M., & Majzoub, Z. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018; 119(5), 783–790.
18. Baig MR, Tan KBC, Nicholls JI. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2010; 104:216-227
19. Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: A systematic review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2010; 37:866-876
20. Ural C, Burgaz Y, Sarac¸ D. In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in five ceramic restoration fabricating techniques. Quintessence International. 2010; 41:585-590
21. Sušić, Ivan, Marica Ž. Travar and Milenko V. Šušić. “The application of CAD / CAM technology in Dentistry.” (2017).
22. Davidowitz, Gary & Kotick, Philip. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dental clinics of North America. 2011; 55. 559-70.
23. Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41: 853–74.
24. Alghamdi HS, Jansen JA. The development and future of dental implants. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(2):167-172.
25. Ülkü, Sabiha Zelal et al. “Clinical Evaluation of Complications in Implant-Supported Dentures: A 4-Year Retrospective Study.” Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2017; 23: 6137-6143.
26. Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 2013; 29:174‑80.
27. Schaerer P, Sato T, Wohlwend A. A comparison of the marginal fit of three cast ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59:534-42.
28. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10(5):478-84.
29. Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns: a clinical study. Dent Mater 1985; 1:197-9.
30. Boening KW, Walter MH, Reppel PD. Non-cast titanium restorations in fixed prosthodontics. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19:281-7.
31. Aeran H, Sagar M, Seth J, Evaluation of marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM vs conventional all-ceramic crowns on an implant abutment: An in vitro study. Int J Oral Health Dent 2021;7(2):104-109
32. Al-Zubaidi, ZAK & Al-Shamma, Abdulla. The Effect of Different Finishing Lines on the Marginal Fitness of Full Contour Zirconia and Glass Ceramic CAD/CAM Crowns (An in-vitro study). Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques.2015; 4. 10.