Innovation In Surgical Procedures Coordinated Efforts Among Optical, Nursing, Magical Devices, Radiology and Anesthesia Professionals
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Surgical innovation relies on integration of diverse technologies and expertise from multiple disciplines. Optical imaging, nursing care, magical devices, radiological guidance, and anesthesia all contribute to improved surgical outcomes.
Understanding coordination best practices is important to support continued advancement in minimally invasive procedures, robotic surgery, image-guided interventions, and other innovative techniques. This review aims to explore coordination for innovative surgical procedures among optical, nursing, magical devices, radiology, and anesthesia professionals and identify opportunities to enhance cross-disciplinary collaboration.
Development of high-resolution imaging techniques (e.g., enhanced endoscopes, microscopes)
High-resolution imaging allows surgeons to visualize surgical anatomy and perform procedures through smaller incisions or natural orifices. Advances in endoscope and microscope design have led to improved optics, digital sensors, and high-definition displays that provide surgeons with clearer views during minimally invasive procedures.
References
Berríos-Torres, S. I., Umscheid, C. A., Bratzler, D. W., Leas, B., Stone, E. C., Kelz, R. R., ... & Dellinger, E. P. (2017). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA surgery, 152(8), 784-791.
Carli, F., et al. (2015). Evidence basis for regional anesthesia in multimodal analgesia regimen. Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 28(5), 519–524.
Chen, Y., et al. (2020). Enabling interoperable secondary use of clinical data for research and quality improvement. Yearbook of medical informatics, 29(1), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710018.
Clark, P. G., Cott, C. A., & Drinka, T. J. K. (2017). Theory and practice in interprofessional ethics: A framework for understanding moral agency in complex health care systems. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(5), 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1316807.
Görges, M., & Marschollek, M. (2020). Integrating patient monitoring data into clinical information systems: A review of challenges and approaches. International journal of medical informatics, 134, 104023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104023.
Hemmerling, T. M. (2019). Advances in inhalation anesthetics. F1000Research, 8. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18251.1.
Hung, A. J., et al. (2017). Robotic surgery and surgical outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open, 7(8), e016349. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016349.
Lee, S. W., & Park, H. A. (2019). Effects of an integrated monitoring system on nurses' workload and patient safety in the post-anesthesia care unit. International journal of medical informatics, 127, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.016.
Li, Z., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Wang, Q., & Hu, Y. (2020). Robotic nursing: A scoping review. International journal of nursing sciences, 7(1), 107-115.
Liu, X., et al. (2018). 3D printing and its role in surgery. IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering, 11, 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2018.2834353.
Manser, T. (2009). Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: A review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 53(2), 143–151.
Maier-Hein, L., et al. (2017). Optical techniques for 3D surface reconstruction in computer-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Medical image analysis, 33, 203-215.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
O’Leary, K. J., Sehgal, N. L., Terrell, G., & Williams, M. V. (2015). Interdisciplinary teamwork in hospitals: A review and practical recommendations for improvement. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 10(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2293.
O'Leary, K. J., et al. (2016). Improving teamwork in healthcare: Current approaches and the path forward. BMJ quality & safety, 25(11), 627-632. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004515.
Park, J., Lee, E., Seong, P., Kim, S.-H., & Kim, G. (2018). Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians in acute care unit. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(2), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1360143.
Radke, O. C., et al. (2019). Current state and future perspectives of anesthesia workstation monitoring. Biomedical engineering online, 18(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0666-0.
Reeves, S., et al. (2017). A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39. Medical teacher, 39(7), 656-668.
Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2010). Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3).
Sapci, A. H., & Connor, S. (2019). The impact of surgical robots on nursing practice and patient outcomes. AORN journal, 109(4), 452-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.12634.
Sarkar, N., et al. (2016). Smart surgical instruments and systems: Review. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 63(1), 120-134. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2460284.
Smith, C. A., Bosch, J. A., & Wenzel, R. P. (2020). A cost analysis of surgical site infections in general surgery. JAMA Surgery, 155(11), 997.
Sood, A., et al. (2019). 3D printed surgical implants: A review. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 15(6), e2061.
Srikanteswaraiah, A., Ali, M. K., & Rege, R. V. (2021). Interprofessional collaboration in surgery: A scoping review. BMJ Open, 11(7), e048420.
Wendler, T., et al. (2016). Hybrid navigation: Where robotics meets radiology. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 11(3), 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1295-y.
