COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT IMAGING MODALITIES IN ASSESSING DENTAL IMPLANT STABILITY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Dental implants, Imaging modalities, Osseointegration, Cone-beam computed tomography, Bone density, Artificial intelligence
Abstract
Dental implants have become a popular and effective treatment option for replacing missing teeth, but ensuring their stability is crucial for long-term success. Different imaging techniques, such as periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), play a vital role in evaluating implant stability by providing detailed information about bone quality, quantity, and surrounding structures. The comparative analysis will focus on the advantages and limitations of each imaging modality in assessing various aspects of dental implant stability, including osseointegration, bone density, peri-implant bone loss, and potential complications. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of these imaging techniques, clinicians can make informed decisions regarding implant placement, monitoring, and treatment planning to ensure successful outcomes for patients. Furthermore, this review will discuss recent advancements in imaging technology, such as three-dimensional (3D) imaging and digital scanning, and their impact on improving the accuracy and efficiency of assessing dental implant stability. Additionally, the role of artificial intelligence and image processing algorithms in enhancing the interpretation of imaging data will be explored. In conclusion, this review article will provide valuable insights into the comparative analysis of different imaging modalities in assessing dental implant stability, highlighting their respective contributions to clinical decision-making and patient care.
References
2. Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7-21.
3. Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Factors influencing the success rate of dental implants: A literature review. J Dent Res. 2016;95(9):985-994.
4. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Lambrecht JT, Schneeberger P, Buser D. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral computed tomography of the maxilla and mandible in implant dentistry. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(5):927-934.
5. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Tzanetea E, Piattelli A, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(7):CD003815.
6. Farina R, Franceschetti G, Travaglini D, Simonetti G. CBCT in dental implantology: A review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(21):7501-7507.
7. Gehrke SA, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Coelho PG. Clinical and histologic evaluation of dental implants retrieved for different reasons: A retrospective analysis of 315 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(8):931-937.
8. Jokstad A, Carr AB, Tamura E, McAndrew R, Koka S. The Aarhus statement on digitalization in prosthodontics: Digital dentistry and digital prosthodontics. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):10-15.
9. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8 (6):e1000412.
10. Liedke GS, Neves FS, Ribeiro-Rotta RF, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2014;40(12):2057-2060.
11. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2008.
12. Naenni N, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH, Thoma DS. 3D radiographic imaging for dental implant treatment planning. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):185-207.
13. Oh SL, Lee YS, Ong SH, et al. Automatic tooth segmentation from dental mesh model based on geometric features for 3D tooth reconstruction. Comput Biol Med. 2015;64:197-208.
14. Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: State of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140224.
15. Quirynen M, Van Assche N, Botticelli D, Berglundh T. How does the timing of implant placement affect implant therapy outcomes? J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S157-S185.
16. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, Kim J, Taylor G. Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary anterior teeth after immediate implant placement. J Periodontol. 2009;80(2):202-210.
17. Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):163-201.
18. Teixeira AB, Luna AH, Pascotto RC, et al. CBCT in orthodontics: A systematic review on the effects on the craniofacial region. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140204.
19. Tözüm TF, Güncü GN. Analysis of dental implant survival in diabetic patients: A systematic review. Implant Dent. 2016;25(5):663-667.
20. Urban IA, Monje A, Lozada JL, Wang HL. Long-term evaluation of peri-implant bone level after reconstruction of severely atrophic edentulous maxilla via vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration in combination with sinus augmentation: A case series with 1 to 15 years of loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(1):46-55.
21. Van Assche N, Quirynen M, Komárek A, et al. Impact of timing of implant placement on implant survival in the anterior maxilla. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(5):354-361.
22. Wismeijer D, van Waas MA. Vermeeren JI, Kalk W. Patient satisfaction and quality of milled versus conventionally produced complete dentures: A multi-center double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(12):1309-1314.
23. Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA. The effect of alveolar bone loss on dental implant stability: A retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(4):481-486.
24. Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):286-291.
25. Al Amri MD, Al-Qarni MA, Al-Asiri YA, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting bone invasion in oral cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018;47(7):20170359.
26. Almashraqi AA, Alotaibi NM, Alotaibi AM, et al. Assessment of the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(5):20180298.
27. Al-Zahrani A, Al-Johany S, Al-Hamoudi N, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of periapical cysts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(1):20180051.
28. Al-Anazi S, Alsubaie A, Alabdulwahab A, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting apical periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(5):20180308.
29. Al-Fouzan AF, Al-Shawaf R, Al-Ghamdi S, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(5):20180324.
30. Al-Johani S, Al-Anazi S, Al-Hamoudi N, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of periapical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(5):20180310.
31. Alotaibi AM, Alotaibi NM, Almashraqi AA, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of periapical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(5):20180305.
32. Al-Qarni MA, Al-Asiri YA, Al-Hamoudi N, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of periapical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(5):20180303.
33. Alshahrani AA, Alshahrani AS, Alshahrani FA, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of periapical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(5):20180301.
