PHYSICAL AND NEURODEVELOPMENTAL EVALUATION OF CHILDREN ADOPTED FROM EASTERN EUROPE

Main Article Content

Monique Robert
Ana Carceller
Valérie Domken
Félix Ramos
Otilia Dobrescu
Marie-Noëlle Simard
Julie Gosselin

Keywords

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, international adoption, Eastern Europe, 4-Digit Diagnostic Code, 4-DDC

Abstract

Background


Children adopted from Eastern Europe are at risk of prenatal alcohol exposure, consequently at risk of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD). To our knowledge, a systematic complete assessment of these disabilities among adoptees from Eastern Europe has not yet been reported.


 


Objective


To assess physical and neurodevelopmental status to identify FASD in children adopted from Eastern Europe.


 


Method


Cross sectional study at International Adoption Clinic of a paediatric academic hospital. This evaluation was realized according to the 4-Digit Diagnostic Code (4-DDC).


 


Results


Twenty-nine children were evaluated. Five years after adoption, 7% (N=2) still presented growth delay and 24% (N=7) microcephaly. Facial evaluation demonstrated moderate Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) features in 7% (N=2) of children. Amiel-Tison Neurological Assessment was non optimal in 46% (N=13/28) of children. Visual-motor perception skills were mainly normal, but 14% (N=4) showed distal somatopraxic problems. Cognition, executive functioning, abstract reasoning and memory were normal. Full scale IQ was 105.5 ± 13.3; verbal IQ < performance IQ (p<0.005), work memory < short memory (p<0.0001), receptive <expressive language (p<0.0001). Attention-deficit hyperactive disorder was presented in 31% (N=9). Concerning adaptive behaviour, social skills and social communication, 29% (N=8) performed <-2 SD and 33% (N=5/15) needed school assistance. According to 4-DDC, 7% (N=2) of children were normal, 21% (N=6) of children were known exposed to alcohol, one of these was classified as Partial FAS and five others presented neurological damage, or neurobehavioral disorders with or without sentinel physical findings. Three percent (N=1) were classified FAS although alcohol exposure was unknown. Sixty-nine percent (N=20) of children presented physical findings alone or neurological anomalies with or without physical findings.


 


Conclusion


In our cohort, the 4-DDC was useful. Systematic and multidisciplinary neurodevelopmental assessment is needed in these adopted children, for an early intervention to prevent secondary disabilities and therefore optimize children’s outcome.

Abstract 121 | PDF Downloads 49

References

1. World Health Organization Global Database on alcohol use. Accessed on December 8, 2008 at: http://www3.who.int/whosis/alcohol.
2. Barr HM, Streissguth AP. Identifying maternal self-reported alcohol use associated with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Alcohol Clin Exp Res.2001;25: 283-7.
3. Loock C, Conry J, Cook JL. Guidelines for Diagnosis. Identifying fetal alcohol spectrum disorder in primary care. JAMC 2005;172 (5): 628-30.
4. Bertrand J, Floyd LL, Weber MK; Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Prevention Team, Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for identifying and referring persons with fetal alcohol syndrome. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005; 54 (RR-11):1-14.
5. Miller LC, Chan W, Litvinova A, et al; Boston-Murmansk Orphanage Research Team. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders in children residing in Russian orphanages: a phenotypic survey. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006;30:531-8.
6. Aronson J. Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute Conference. Alcohol and Drug Exposure of Infants and Children: Research and Public Policy. October 24-25 1997. Alexandria, Virginia. Alcohol Exposure in Internationally Adopted Children: Russia.
7. Fetal alcohol syndrome Diagnostic and Prevention Network. University of Washington, Seattle. The 4-Digit Diagnostic Code. Accessed on December 8, 2008 at: http://depts.washington.edu/fasdpn
8. Smith DW. The fetal alcohol syndrome. Hosp Pract. 1979;14:121-8.
9. Astley S. FAS Facial Photographic Analysis Software version 1.0.0. FAS Diagnostic and Prevention Network, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 2003.
10. Chudley AE, Conry J, Cook JL, et al. Public Health Agency of Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder. Fetal alcohol spectrum
disorder: Canadian guidelines for diagnosis. CMAJ 2005; 172(5 Suppl):S1-21.
11. Gosselin J, Amiel-Tison C. Le développement neurologique de la naissance à 6 ans. Ed.CHU Sainte-Justine, Elsevier Masson. 2007. 208 pages.
12. Hammill DD, Voress JK, Pearson NA. Developmental Test of Visual Perception, second edition. 1993. PRO-ED Inc.
13. Bergès J, Lézine I. Test d’imitation de gestes, 2ème éd. Paris : Masson, 1972.
14. Vaivre-Douret L. Évaluation de la motricité gnoso-praxique distale chez l’enfant. Une adaptation du test d’imitation de gestes de Bergès-Lézine. Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages. 1999;51 :13-20.
15. Dunn W. Infant-Toddler Sensory Profile. User’s manual. Therapy Skill Builders Psychological Corporation; 2002. Free French translation.
16. Nellhaus G. Head circumference from birth to eighteen years. Practical composite international and interracial graphs. Pediatrics 1968;41:106-14.
17. Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence– Revised. (WPPSI-R) New York, NY: Psychological Corporation; 1990.
18. Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WPPSI-R). 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1991.
19. Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV. 1984. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. A revision of the Vineland Social Maturity Scale developed by the psychologist Doll and originally published in 1936.
20. Conners CK, Sitarenios G, Parker JD, et al. The revised Conners’ Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R); factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1998;26:257-68.
21. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). 2000.
22. Jellinek MS, Murphy JM, Robinson J, et al. Pediatric Symptom Checklist: screening school-age children for psychosocial dysfunction. J Pediatr. 1988;112:201-9.
23. Landgren M, Andersson Grönlund M, Elfstrand PO, et al. Health before and after adoption from Eastern Europe. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:720-5.
24. Streissguth AP, Barr HM, Bookstein FL, et al. The long-term neurocognitive consequences of prenatal alcohol exposure: A 14-year Study. Psychol. Sci. 1999;10: 186-90.
25. Sowell ER, Mattson SN, Thompson PM, et al. Mapping callosal morphology and cognitive correlates: effects of heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Neurology. 2001;57: 235-44.
26. Kalberg WO, Provost B, Tollison SJ, et al. Comparison of motor delays in young children with fetal alcohol syndrome to those with prenatal alcohol exposure and with no prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30:2037-45.
27. Coggins TE, Timler GR, Olswang LB. A state of double jeopardy: impact of prenatal alcohol exposure and adverse environments on the social communicative abilities of school-age children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2007;38:117-27.
28. Kulaga V. Cognitive processing speed among children exposed to fetal alcohol. JFAS Int 2006; 4; e3-Feb 2006:1-4.
29. Fryer SL, McGee CL, Matt GE, et al. Evaluation of psychopathological conditions in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Pediatrics. 2007; 119:e733-41.
30. O’Connor TG, Rutter M, Beckett C, et al. The effects of global severe privation on cognitive competence: extension and longitudinal follow-up. English and Romanian Adoptees Study Team. Child Dev. 2000;71:376-90.
31. Loomes C, Rasmussen C, Pei J, et al. The effect of rehearsal training on working memory span of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Res Dev Disab. 2008; 29:113-24.