THE PROCESS AND BENEFITS OF A UNIVERSITY AND STATE HEALTH AGENCY COLLABORATION FOR ALCOHOL- FREE PREGNANCIES IN OREGON

Main Article Content

Jessica W Henderson
Lesa Dixon-Gray

Keywords

Public health collaboration, community collaboration, social marketing, alcohol-exposed pregnancy

Abstract

Background


A significant number of college women are at risk for alcohol-exposed pregnancies because the ages of the heaviest alcohol consumption is typically 18 through 21 years, and contraception may be used ineffectively or not at all. These risks call for greater prevention efforts.


 


Objective


Collaboration between a higher education institution and a government health agency to reduce alcoholexposed pregnancies in Oregon.


 


Methods


Health professionals from the Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) Prevention Program of the Oregon Public Health Division presented current research and explained the mission of a Center for Disease Control (CDC) cooperative agreement to university students in a Health Communication course. The students then developed social marketing messages that targeted alcohol use and/or contraception behavior.


 


Results


At the end of the course, the students presented their campaigns campus-wide, and to the state agency. Four of the theory-based messages are illustrated in this article.


 


Conclusion


The students brought to the state FAS Program a specific range of knowledge, vocabulary and creative skills to create messages for young adults. University students reported benefits of becoming familiar with government agencies and working on “real-life” projects that had the potential to be used in community settings.

Abstract 84 | PDF Downloads 46

References

1. Chiriboga CA. Fetal alcohol and drug effects. Neurologist 2003; 9,6: 267-79.
2. Abel EL, Sokol RJ. Incidence of fetal alcohol syndrome and economic impact of FAS-related anomalies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1987; 19:51-70.
3. Burd L, Cotsonas-Hassler TM, Martsolf JT, Kerbeshian J. Recognition and management of FAS. Neurotoxicology & Teratology 2003;25, 6:681-688.
4. Lupton C, Burd L, Harwood R. Cost of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Am J Med Genet C 2004; 127C:42-50.
5. Ryan DM, Bonnett DM, Gass CB. Sobering thoughts: Town hall meetings on fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Am J Public Health 2006; 96, 12:2098-2101.
6. Office of the Surgeon General. U.S. Surgeon General Releases Advisory on Alcohol Use in Pregnancy. Washington DC: Department of Health and Human Services 2005.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Records of the Meeting of the National Task Force on FAS and FAE. National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities 2002.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Alcohol use among childbearing-age women in the United States 1991-1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2002; 51:273-6.
9. Chen K, Kandel DB. The natural history of drug use from adolescence to the mid-thirties in a general population sample. Am J Public Health 1995; 85:41-47.
10. Ebrahim SH, Kiekman ST, Floyd L, Decoufle P. Comparison of binge drinking among pregnant and non-pregnant women, U.S. 1991-1995. A J of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999; 180:1-7.
11. Wechsler H, Davenport A, Dowdall G, Moeykens B, Castillo S. Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college: A national survey of students at 140 campuses. J Am Medical Assoc 1994; 272, 1672-1677.
12. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 46:24-29.
13. Cornelius MD, Richardson GA, Day NL, Cornelius JR, Geva D, Taylor PM. A comparison of prenatal drinking in two recent samples of adolescents and adults. J Stud Alc 1994; suppl 55:412-419.
14. Sawyer RG, Pinciaro PJ, Anderson-Sawyer A. Pregnancy testing and counseling: A university health center’s five year experience. J of Am College Health 1998; 4b:221-225.
15. Ceperich SD, Ingersoll KS, Nettleman MD, Johnson BA. College women at risk for alcoholexposed pregnancy. Poster presented to the Am Psychological Assoc Convention, July 2004, Honolulu, HI.
16. Ingersoll KS, Ceperich SD, Nettleman MD, Karanda K, Brocksen S, Johnson BA. Reducing alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk in college women: Initial outcomes of a clinical trial of a motivational intervention. J of Substance Abuse Treatment 2005; 29:173-180.
17. Bradley K, Dixon-Gray L. Oregon FAS Prevention Project Implementation Plan. Oregon Dept of Human Services, Office of Family Health 2004.
18. O’Hara R, Harker D, Racita M, Harkar M. Risky alcohol consumption by young female Australians: The influence of significant others. Social Marketing Qtrly 2007; 13: 4, 26-46.
19. National Cancer Institute. Making Health Communication Programs Work: A Planner’s Guide. 2003. Rockville: MD. U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services.
20. Boulter LT. The effectiveness of peer-led FAS/FAE prevention presentations in middle and high schools. J of Alcohol & Drug Education 2007. Retrieved Jan. 7, 2008 from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The%20effective ness%20of%20peerled% 20FAS/FAE%20prevention%20presentatio ns%20in...-a0169677078
21. Weber MK, Floyd RL, Riley EP, Snider DE. National task force on fetal alcohol syndrome and fetal alcohol effect. MMWR 2002;51,RR- 14:9-12.