MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF THE DISTAL END OF THE DRY ADULT HUMERUS AND ITS CLINICAL CORRELATION: AN INSTITUTIONAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Capitulum, distal end, trochlea, humerus, fracture, medial condyle, lateral condyle
Abstract
Background: The humerus is the largest and most powerful bone of the upper limb. Movement of the humerus is needed for daily activities like writing, lifting things and throwing, etc. Morphometry of the humerus is important for the identification of unknown bodies, estimation of height, age, and gender in forensic science. Morphometry of the distal end of the humerus can assist in reconstructive surgeries through implants as orthopedic surgeons face difficulty in fixing complex fractures.
Aim:- The present study aims to determine the mean values of various parameters of the distal end of the humerus.
Methodology:-Eight morphometric parameters were evaluated from 70 dry adult humeri using measuring tape and vernier caliper. The average maximal length of the humerus in the present study on the right side is 306.55±16.45mm and on the left side is 303.20±11.12mm. The transverse distance between the medial and lateral epicondyle on the right side of the humerus is 59.47±2.53mm and on the left side 57.57±3.53mm respectively. The average transverse distance between the capitulum and medial flange of trochlea on the right side is 42.27±1.99mm and on the left side is 42.48±2.42mm respectively. The average maximum transverse distance from the medial epicondyle to the capitulum on the right side is 56.60±2.71mm and on the left side is 53.95±3.96 respectively. The average maximal horizontal diameter of trochlea on the right side is 23.27±1.79 and on the left side is 22.80±1.74 respectively. The anteroposterior diameter of the trochlea at the middle of the trochlea on the right side is 16.57 ±1.55 and on the left side is 16.30±1.24 respectively. The maximal length of the medial flange of the trochlea on the right side is 23.23±1.67 and on the left side is 22.67±1.70. The maximal length of the lateral flange of the trochlea on the right side is 18.17±1.72 and on the left side is 17.17±1.28respectively.
Conclusion: The morphometric analysis of the humerus can be useful for anatomists, forensic experts, and archeologists for the estimation of the stature, age, and sex of an individual. This information is also useful for surgeons in preparing implants and reconstruction of fractures of the distal end of the humerus.
References
2. Sinha P, Bhutia KL, Tamnag KB. Morphometric measurements of segments in dry humerus J.Evolution Med Dent.Sci.2017;6(67):4819-4822,DOI:10.14260/Jemds/2017/1045
3. Narayana AS, Aradhyula HD.The morphometric study of the distal end of the humerus. Indian Journal of Research April-2018; print issn no 2250-1991
4. Choudhary U, Kumar S, Singh A, Bharati P.A radiological study of ossification at the lower end of the humerus for age estimation among boys in Central Karnataka, India.Int J Med Sci 2017;5:1204-7
5. Chaudhary RK, Dhakal A, Sah SK, Parajuli SB, Pokhrel S, Deo SK.Morphometric evaluation of dry humerus bone in Medical College of Eastern Nepal. BJHS 2019;4(2);729-733
6. Purkait R, Chandran H. An anthropometric investigation into the probable cause of formation of carrying angle anthropometric investigation into the probable cause of formation of 'carrying angle´.A sex indicator.J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2004;26;14-19
7. Prasad NC, Shivashankarappa A, Pavan P Havaldar, Shruthi BN, and Shaik Hussain Saheb.A study on segments of the humerus and its clinical importance.doi.org/ 10.22271/ortho.2017.v3.i4k.103
8. Lakshmi Kantha BM, Naveen NS, Kulkarni R, Veena V, Regression equation for estimation of distal humeral length using measurements of its proximal segments among Indian population.Natl J Clin Anat 2016;5:15-21
9. Munoz JI, Linares Iglesias M, Suarez Penaranda JM, Mayo M, Miguens X, Rodriguez Calvo MS, et al. Stature estimation from radiographically determined long bone length in a Spanish population sample. Forensic Sci Int 2001;46:363-6
10. 10.Ashiyani ZA, Solanki S, Mehta CD.The morphometric measurement of a segment of humerus, J Res Med Den Sci 2016,4:38-40
11. Burkhart KJ, Muller LP,Schwarz C, Mattyasovszky SG, Rommens PM.Treatment of complex intraarticular fracture of the distal humerus with the latitude elbow prosthesis.Oper Orthop Traumatol 2010;22:279-98
12. Siva Narayana A, Himabindu A.The morphometric study of the distal end of the humerus. Paripex Indian J Res 2018;7:136-7
13. Dunn J, Kusnezov N, Pirela-Cruz M. Distal humeral hemiarthoplasty: Indication, result and complications. A systematic review Hand (N Y) 2014;9:406-1
14. Akman SD, Karkas P, Bozkir MG. The morphometric measurements of humerus segments. Turk J Med Sci 2006;36:81-5
15. Salles AD, Carvalho CR, Silva DM, Santana LA.Reconstruction of humeral length from measurements of its proximal and distal fragments.Braz J Morphol Sci 2009;55-61.
16. Hiramoto Y, Right-left differences in the lengths of the human arm and leg bones.Kaibogaku Zasshi 1993;68:536-43
17. Robinson CM, Hill RM, Jacobs N, Dall G, Court-Brown CM, Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fracture: Epidemiology and results of treatment J Orthop Trauma 2003;17:38-47
18. Sanchez-Sotelo J. Total elbow arthroplasty.Open Orthop J 2011;5:115-23
19. Mckee MD, Pugh DM, Richards RR, Pedersen E, Jones C, Schemitsch EH. Effect of humeral condylar resection on strength and functional outcome after semi-constrained total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85: 802-7.