PREVALENCE OF MASKED HYPERTENSION IN PATIENTS WITH METABOLIC SYNDROME COMPARED TO HEALTHY ADULTS- AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY USING AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING

Main Article Content

Dr Kritesh Mehta
Dr Amitesh Nagarwal
Dr Asharam Panda
Dr Sundeep Mishra

Keywords

Metabolic Syndrome, Masked Hypertension, Nocturnal Variation, Blood Pressure (BP), Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM)

Abstract

Introduction: Metabolic syndrome is characterized by high clinic blood pressure (BP), abdominal obesity, impaired fasting glucose, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and high triglycerides. In some of these individuals, office BP measurement may be normal with underlying masked hypertension which require correct diagnosis and management to reduce cardiovascular event. Current study aims to assess prevalence of masked hypertension in this population.


Material and Methods: We have recruited 180 Study subjects allocated in two groups- Group A (90 patients with Metabolic Syndrome) and Group B (90 healthy controls without Metabolic Syndrome), who had normal office blood pressure measurement. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was done for all to assess 24hr average BP, night time average BP and day time average BP. Details of other cardiovascular risk factors and laboratory investigations were also collected.


Results: Prevalence of Masked Hypertension among group A or with Metabolic Syndrome (Cases) was 52.2%. Cases had more than twofold (2.42) higher risk of masked hypertension and were found statistically significant(p-value=0.0044). More subjects who consumed alcohol (37.78%) and smoke habits (56.67%) in cases Group A had increased levels of Clinic BP, waist circumference, fasting glucose levels and deranged lipid profile than Group B


Conclusion: Masked hypertension is present significant numbers in patients with metabolic syndrome compared to healthy controls. Correct diagnosis using ABPM and treatment with antihypertensive may further reduce risk of cardiovascular events.

Abstract 93 | PDF Downloads 66

References

1. Pickering TG, Davidson K, Gerin W, et al.; Masked hypertension; Hypertension; 2002;40(6):795–796.
2. Papadopoulos DP, Papademetriou V. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis and management. J Cardiovasc Pharmocol Ther. 2006;11(2):113–118.
3. McKay DW, Myers MG, Bolli P, et al. Masked hypertension: a common but insidious presentation of hypertension; Can J Cardiol. 2006;22(7):617–620.
4. O’Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, et al; European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and selfblood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2005;23(4):697–701.
5. Pickering TG, Shimbo D, Haas D. Ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(22):2368–2374.
6. Bobrie G, Chatellier G, Genes N, et al. Cardiovascular prognosis of “masked hypertension” detected by blood pressure self-measurement in elderly treated hypertensive patients. JAMA. 2004;291(11):1342–1349.
7. Mann SJ, James GD, Wang RS, et al. Elevation of ambulatory systolic blood pressure in hypertensive smokers; A case-control study. JAMA. 1991;265:2226–2228.
8. Clement DL, De Buyzere ML, De Bacquer DA, et al. Office versus Ambulatory Pressure Study Investigators. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension; N Engl J Med. 2003;348(24):2407–2415.
9. Bobrie G, Chatellier G, Genes N, et al. Cardiovascular prognosis of “masked hypertension” detected by blood pressure self-measurement in elderly treated hypertensive patients. JAMA. 2004;291(11):1342– 1349.
10. Bjorklund K, Lind L, Zethelius B, et al. Isolated ambulatory hypertension predicts cardiovascular morbidity in elderly men. Circulation. 2003; 107:1297–1302.
11. Mancia G, Parati G. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and organ damage; Hypertension. 2000; 36:894–900.
12. Redon J, Campos C, Narciso ML, et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in refractory hypertension. Hypertension. 1998; 31:712–718.
13. Palatini P, Winnicki M, Santonastaso M, et al.; Prevalence and clinical significance of isolated ambulatory hypertension in young subjects screened for stage I hypertension; Hypertension; 2004;44:170–174.
14. Tomiyama M, Horio T, Kamide K, et al.; Reverse white-coat effect as an independent risk for left ventricular concentric hypertrophy in patients with treated essential hypertension; J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21(3):212–219.
15. Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Metoki H, et al.; Prognosis of “masked” hypertension and “white-coat” hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study; J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(3):508–515.
16. Kuriyama S, Otsuka Y, Iida R, et al.; Morning blood pressure predicts hypertensive organ damage in patients with renal diseases: effect of intensive antihypertensive therapy in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Intern Med.2005;44(12):1239–1246.
17. Zimmet P., Magliano D., Matsuzawa Y. et al.; The metabolic syndrome: a global public health problem and a new definition; J Atheroscler Thromb. 2012(12), 295–300
18. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement; Curr Opin Cardiol 2006;21:1–6.
19. Clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in a population-based sample of African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study, 2017 Apr;11(4):204-212.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 16
20. Bastos JM, Bertoquini S, Polónia J. Relationship of circadian blood pressure and morning blood pressure surge with the severity of metabolic syndrome in newly diagnosed hypertensives. Rev Port Cardiol. 2007;26(7–8):731‐741.
21. Lee JH, Bae JW, Park JB, et al. Morning hypertension in treated hypertensives: baseline characteristics and clinical implications. Korean Circ J. 2011;41(12):733‐743.
22. Tamaki S, Nakamura Y, Yoshino T, et al. The association between morning hypertension and metabolic syndrome in hypertensive patients. Hypertens Res. 2006;29(10):783‐788. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]