Invasive species have a significant detrimental impact on the abundance of aquatic organisms, notably macrophytes, zooplankton, and fish

Main Article Content

Dr Abdur Rehman, Aneela Ilyas, Hamna Afzal, Dr Hassan Waheed, Dr Aqsa Mustaqeem, Dr. Kiran Rubbani, Dr Bilal Ahmad, Dr. Muhammad Farhan Nasir, Om Raj Devi Sonia, Kashif Lodhi

Keywords

Non-Native Species, Native Species, Invasive Species, Ecological Impacts, Aquatic Invasions.

Abstract

The entry of non-native species into ecosystems has profound impacts on the food chain, as these species often have different functions compared to the existing community members.


Aim: In this review, we aim to assess the consistency of ecological impacts caused by aquatic invasions diagonally different taxonomic group and habitats.


Methods: To achieve this, researchers have conducted very comprehensive meta-analysis using data from 159 journals, encompassing 805 cases. Our analysis covered a wide variety of invasive species, including primary producers, filter collectors, omnivores, and predators, as well as various resident aquatic community components such as macrophytes, phytoplankton, zooplankton, benthic invertebrates, and fish, across rivers, lakes, and estuaries. The current findings indicate very significant negative impact of invasive species on the abundance of aquatic communities, particularly affecting macrophytes, zooplankton, and fish. Interestingly, we did not find consistent evidence supporting a decline in species range in occupied habitats, signifying the potential time delay among quick deviations in abundance in addition the local extinctions.


Results: Invasive species have been observed to cause various changes in invaded habitats, including bigger water turbidity, nitrogen levels, and organic matter concentration. These alterations are linked to invaders' ability to transform habitats and promote eutrophication. The increase of invasive macrophytes had the most significant negative impact on fish abundance, while filter collectors, through their filtering activity, depleted planktonic communities. Omnivores, comprising both facultative and obligate herbivores, were responsible for the most substantial decline in macrophyte abundance, and the introduction of new predators had the greatest negative effect on benthic invertebrates. Those effects were consistently observed across different habitats and experimental approaches. Founded on the current findings, researchers suggest an agenda that outlines the positive and negative interactions between invasive species, occupying four trophic positions, and the five different components of recipient communities.


Conclusion: Our present study includes both direct biotic relationships like predation, rivalry, and grazing, in addition to secondary changes in water physicochemical conditions caused by the attackers, including habitat modification. Considering the significant trophic linkages that characterize aquatic environments, this concept is useful in predicting the wide-ranging effects of biological incursions on the foundation and functionality of those ecosystems.

Abstract 185 | PDF Downloads 64

References

1. Gallardo, B., Clavero, M., Sánchez, M. I., & Vilà, M. (2016). Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Global change biology, 22(1), 151-163.
2. Mrnak, J. T., Sikora, L. W., Zanden, M. J. V., & Sass, G. G. (2023). Applying panarchy theory to aquatic invasive species management: a case study on invasive rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 31(1), 66-85.
3. Rishan, S. T., Kline, R. J., & Rahman, M. S. (2023). Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect subterranean and aquatic invasive species: A critical review on the challenges and limitations of eDNA metabarcoding. Environmental Advances, 100370.
4. Byers, J. E., Blaze, J. A., Dodd, A. C., Hall, H. L., & Gribben, P. E. (2023). Exotic asphyxiation: interactions between invasive species and hypoxia. Biological Reviews, 98(1), 150-167.
5. Zhu, K., Cheng, Y., & Zhou, Q. (2023). China’s water diversion carries invasive species. Science, 380(6651), 1230-1230.
6. Golebie, E. J., & van Riper, C. J. (2023). Enhancing aquatic invasive species outreach through values-framed messages. Environmental Communication, 17(1), 67-86.
7. Yang, R., Cao, R., Gong, X., & Feng, J. (2023). Large shifts of niche and range in the golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata), an aquatic invasive species. Ecosphere, 14(1), e4391.
8. Soto, I., Ahmed, D. A., Balzani, P., Cuthbert, R. N., & Haubrock, P. J. (2023). Sigmoidal curves reflect impacts and dynamics of aquatic invasive species. Science of The Total Environment, 872, 161818.
9. Velie, R. E., Poulos, H. M., & Green, J. M. (2023). Exploring lake user and manager knowledge of aquatic invasive species in New Hampshire freshwater lake systems, USA. Journal for Nature Conservation, 73, 126405.
10. Couch, C. E., Peterson, J. T., & Heimowitz, P. (2023). Evaluating the institutional and ecological effects of invasive species prevention policy: a case study from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Management of Biological Invasions, 14(2), 269-288.
11. Lipták, B., Kouba, A., Patoka, J., Paunović, M., & Prokop, P. (2023). Biological invasions and invasive species in freshwaters: Perception of the general public. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1-16.
12. Daniels, J. A., Kerr, J. R., & Kemp, P. S. (2023). River infrastructure and the spread of freshwater invasive species: Inferences from an experimentally‐parameterised individual‐based model. Journal of Applied Ecology.
13. Pile, B., Warren, D., Hassall, C., Brown, L. E., & Dunn, A. M. (2023). Biological Invasions Affect Resource Processing in Aquatic Ecosystems: The Invasive Amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus Impacts Detritus Processing through High Abundance Rather than Differential Response to Temperature. Biology, 12(6), 830.
14. Ainou, H., Panfili, J., Pariselle, A., Labonne, M., Louizi, H., Benhoussa, A., ... & Agnèse, J. F. (2023). Life-history traits in two invasive species of tilapias in Morocco. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 1-13.
15. Ainou, H., Panfili, J., Pariselle, A., Labonne, M., Louizi, H., Benhoussa, A., ... & Agnèse, J. F. (2023). Life-history traits in two invasive species of tilapias in Morocco. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 1-13.
16. McCumber, A., Sullivan, A., Houser, M. K., & Muthukrishnan, R. (2023). Are lakes a public good or exclusive resource? Towards value-based management for aquatic invasive species. Environmental Science & Policy, 139, 130-138.
17. Joffe-Nelson, N., van Riper, C. J., Golebie, E., Johnson, D. N., Eriksson, M., Suski, C., ... & Hunt, L. M. (2023). Angler preferences for management of aquatic invasive species in the USA and Canada: A discrete choice experiment. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 49(2), 545-553.
18. Dobrzycka-Krahel, A., Stepien, C. A., & Nuc, Z. (2023). Neocosmopolitan distributions of invertebrate aquatic invasive species due to euryhaline geographic history and human-mediated dispersal: Ponto-Caspian versus other geographic origins. Ecological Processes, 12(1), 1-16.
19. Johnston, S. J. (2023). Effects of Invasive Species on Ohio River Zooplankton.
20. Thapar, K. (2023). Evaluating the current aquatic invasive species (AIS) treatment methods and exploring different restoration tools that could aid in ecosystem recovery in freshwater ecosystems of Nova Scotia.
21. Campbell, T. B., Hammond, E., & Shaw, B. (2023). Opinions of North American aquatic invasive species managers about potential Buddhist life release practices. Management of Biological Invasions, 14.
22. Hegedűs, B., Bagi, Z., Tóth, B., & Kusza, S. (2023). The European Catfish (Silurus glanis) as an Invasive Species–eDNA Detection Methods. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS ANIMAL SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGIES, 56(1), 145-145.
23. Becker, Y. M., & Wong, W. H. (2023). Aquatic invasive species parrot-feather (Myriophyllum aquaticum) in Massachusetts, USA. BioInvasions Records, 12(2), 477-492.
24. Van Nynatten, A., Gallage, K. S., Lujan, N. K., Mandrak, N. E., & Lovejoy, N. R. (2023). Ichthyoplankton metabarcoding: An efficient tool for early detection of invasive species establishment. Molecular Ecology Resources.
25. Semenchenko, V. P., Lipinskaya, T. P., Rizevski, V. K., & Alekhnovich, A. V. (2023). Ranking of Invasive Aquatic Species of Belarus by Their Impacts on the Basis of GISS (Generic Impact Scoring System). Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 14(2), 229-234.
26. Wang, J., Lu, X., Jing, Q., Zhang, B., Ye, J., Zhang, H., ... & Zhang, J. (2023). Spatiotemporal characterization of heavy metal and antibiotics in the Pearl River Basin and pollutants removal assessment using invasive species-derived biochars. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 454, 131409.
27. Mahon, A. R., Grey, E. K., & Jerde, C. L. (2023). Integrating invasive species risk assessment into environmental DNA metabarcoding reference libraries. Ecological Applications, 33(1), e2730.
28. Boyer, K. E., Safran, S. M., Khanna, S., & Patten, M. V. (2023). Landscape Transformation and Variation in Invasive Species Abundance Drive Change in Primary Production of Aquatic Vegetation in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 20(4).
29. Yanchuck, M. E. (2023). Remote Sensing of Riparian Areas and Invasive Species (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Hampshire).
30. Golebie, E. J., van Riper, C. J., Hitzroth, G., Huegelmann, A., & Joffe-Nelson, N. (2023). Barriers to participation in aquatic invasive species prevention among Illinois, USA recreational water users. Biological Invasions, 1-17.
31. Quintana, A., Marcos, S., Malpica-Cruz, L., Tamayo, L., Canto Noh, J. Á., Fernández-Rivera Melo, F., & Fulton, S. (2023). Socioeconomic dilemmas of commercial markets for invasive species: lessons from lionfish in Mexico. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 80(1), 31-39.
32. Glassic, H. C., Guy, C. S., Tronstad, L. M., Lujan, D. R., Briggs, M. A., Albertson, L. K., & Koel, T. M. (2023). Invasive predator diet plasticity has implications for native fish conservation and invasive species suppression. Plos one, 18(2), e0279099.
33. Lovejoy, R. T. (2023). The Influence of Metacommunity Connectivity and Invasive Species on Diversity and Ecosystem Properties: Invasion, Predation by Native Species, and Genetic Diversity of Propagules (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama).
34. Simantiris, N., Violaris, I. G., & Avlonitis, M. (2023). Computing Invasive Species Population Based on a Generalized Random Walk Process: Application to Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus). Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(7), 1282.
35. Lockwood, J., & Welbourne, D. J. (2023). Invasive Species: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
36. Zhang, X., Du, H., Zhao, Z., Wu, Y., Cao, Z., Zhou, Y., & Sun, Y. (2023). Risk Assessment Model System for Aquatic Animal Introduction Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Animals, 13(12), 2035.
37. Ewers, C., Normant-Saremba, M., Keirsebelik, H., & Schoelynck, J. (2023). The temporal abundance-distribution relationship in a global invader sheds light on species distribution mechanisms. Aquatic Invasions, 18(2), 179-197.
38. Mirimin, L. Marine Invasive Species Ireland (MISI) PROJECT eDNA TOOLKIT.