“BLENDED LEARNING” – EMERGING APPROACH FOR DEVELOPING SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Blended Learning, Science Process Skills, Active Learning
Abstract
This paper elaborates the blended learning as a new approach for science learning through analyzing the learning theories and relationship between science process skills and learning. It is aimed at identifying the significant predictors of blended learning for developing science process skills. A theoretical analysis was done by the researcher for identified the significance of blended learning. We analyse different science process skills and them interrelation for developing concepts.
References
1. Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R., (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Alessi, S.M., (2000). Building versus using simulation. In J.M. Spector & T.M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated & holistic perspectives on learning, instruction & technology: Improving understanding in complex domains, p. 175-196.
3. Algan, S. (1999). The Influence of the computer based physics teaching on the success of the student and modern mathematics and science programs applied in turkey in the years between 1962 and 1985. Ankara: Gazi University, Institute of Science.
4. Alhaabi, B., Anandapuram, S. & Hamza, M. K. (1998). Real laboratories: An innovative repartee for distance learning. Retrieved from:
http://www.cse.fau.edu/~bassem/Publications/Pub-21-JOpenPraxis1998.
5. Alkan, C., Deryakulu D., Simsek N., (1995). Ogretim teknolojilerine giris “Disiplin Sürec urun”. Ankara: Onder Matbaacılık.
6. Alkazemi, (2003) in a similar study, a Ph.D. dissertation completed at the University of Florida analyzed the effects of an instructional sequence of a conceptual computer simulation and real laboratory on middle grade students’ to understand a topic in electrochemistry.
7. Alkazemi, E., (2003). The effect of the instructional sequence of a computer simulation and a traditional laboratory on middle-grade students’ conceptual understanding of electrochemistry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
8. B. Manisha (2014) conducted the “study to effectiveness of developing concepts and principles in physics through virtual lab.
9. Bağcı, N. & Şimşek, S., (1999). The influence of different teaching methods in teaching physics subjects on student’s success, The Journal of Gazi Education Faculty. 19 (3), 79-88.
10. Chan & Fok (2009) conducted a study to “Evaluate learning experiences in virtual laboratory training through student perceptions” Cherryholms, C., (1966). Some current research on effectiveness of education simulation: Implications for alternative strategies. The American Behavioral Scientist, 10, 4-7.
11. Choi and Gennaro (1987), in their study found that a computer simulated activity was not as effective as hands- on lab activity in teaching the volume displacement concept based on these results the researchers concluded that computer-simulated experiences were not as effective as hands-on experiences.
12. Marton, F. and Salj ̈o, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N., editors, The experience of learning. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.
13. Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. MacMillan, New York.
14. Moore, M. (1994). Administrative barriers to adoption of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(3):1–4.
15. NCERT (2005). National Curriculum Framework 2005. National Council for Educational Research and Training.
16. NCERT (2006). National Focus Group on Curriculum, Syllabus and Textbooks. Position Paper. National Council for Educational Research and Training, New Delhi.
17. Pereira, J. A., Pleguezuelos, E., Mer ́ı, A., Molina-Ros, A., Molina-Tom ́as, M. C., and Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. National Center for Biotechnology In-formation, 41(2):189–95.
18. Peterson, C. L. and Bond, N. (2004). Online compared to face-to-face teacher preparation for learning standards-based planning skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4).
19. Spires, H. A., Mason, C., Crissman, C., and Jackson, A. (2001). Exploring the academic self within an electronic mail environment. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 17(2):5–14.
20. Tantrarungroj, P. (2008). Effect of embedded streaming video strategy in an online learning environment on the learning of neuroscience. PhD thesis, Indiana State University, Terre Haute.
21. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3):425–478.
22. Wallace, P. E. and Clariana, R. B. (2000). Achievement predictors for a computer- applications module delivered online. Journal of Information Systems Education, 11(1/2).
2. Alessi, S.M., (2000). Building versus using simulation. In J.M. Spector & T.M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated & holistic perspectives on learning, instruction & technology: Improving understanding in complex domains, p. 175-196.
3. Algan, S. (1999). The Influence of the computer based physics teaching on the success of the student and modern mathematics and science programs applied in turkey in the years between 1962 and 1985. Ankara: Gazi University, Institute of Science.
4. Alhaabi, B., Anandapuram, S. & Hamza, M. K. (1998). Real laboratories: An innovative repartee for distance learning. Retrieved from:
http://www.cse.fau.edu/~bassem/Publications/Pub-21-JOpenPraxis1998.
5. Alkan, C., Deryakulu D., Simsek N., (1995). Ogretim teknolojilerine giris “Disiplin Sürec urun”. Ankara: Onder Matbaacılık.
6. Alkazemi, (2003) in a similar study, a Ph.D. dissertation completed at the University of Florida analyzed the effects of an instructional sequence of a conceptual computer simulation and real laboratory on middle grade students’ to understand a topic in electrochemistry.
7. Alkazemi, E., (2003). The effect of the instructional sequence of a computer simulation and a traditional laboratory on middle-grade students’ conceptual understanding of electrochemistry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
8. B. Manisha (2014) conducted the “study to effectiveness of developing concepts and principles in physics through virtual lab.
9. Bağcı, N. & Şimşek, S., (1999). The influence of different teaching methods in teaching physics subjects on student’s success, The Journal of Gazi Education Faculty. 19 (3), 79-88.
10. Chan & Fok (2009) conducted a study to “Evaluate learning experiences in virtual laboratory training through student perceptions” Cherryholms, C., (1966). Some current research on effectiveness of education simulation: Implications for alternative strategies. The American Behavioral Scientist, 10, 4-7.
11. Choi and Gennaro (1987), in their study found that a computer simulated activity was not as effective as hands- on lab activity in teaching the volume displacement concept based on these results the researchers concluded that computer-simulated experiences were not as effective as hands-on experiences.
12. Marton, F. and Salj ̈o, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N., editors, The experience of learning. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.
13. Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. MacMillan, New York.
14. Moore, M. (1994). Administrative barriers to adoption of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(3):1–4.
15. NCERT (2005). National Curriculum Framework 2005. National Council for Educational Research and Training.
16. NCERT (2006). National Focus Group on Curriculum, Syllabus and Textbooks. Position Paper. National Council for Educational Research and Training, New Delhi.
17. Pereira, J. A., Pleguezuelos, E., Mer ́ı, A., Molina-Ros, A., Molina-Tom ́as, M. C., and Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. National Center for Biotechnology In-formation, 41(2):189–95.
18. Peterson, C. L. and Bond, N. (2004). Online compared to face-to-face teacher preparation for learning standards-based planning skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4).
19. Spires, H. A., Mason, C., Crissman, C., and Jackson, A. (2001). Exploring the academic self within an electronic mail environment. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 17(2):5–14.
20. Tantrarungroj, P. (2008). Effect of embedded streaming video strategy in an online learning environment on the learning of neuroscience. PhD thesis, Indiana State University, Terre Haute.
21. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3):425–478.
22. Wallace, P. E. and Clariana, R. B. (2000). Achievement predictors for a computer- applications module delivered online. Journal of Information Systems Education, 11(1/2).
Article Sidebar
Published
Dec 14, 2021
Article Details
How to Cite
Dr. Manisha Bajpai, & Ms Aadhya Gupta. (2021). “BLENDED LEARNING” – EMERGING APPROACH FOR DEVELOPING SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 28(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.53555/jptcp.v28i2.2955
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author Biographies
Dr. Manisha Bajpai
Principal SAM College, BU Bhopal
Ms Aadhya Gupta
Research Scholar Barkatullah University Bhopal