The association between the quality of life and the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients with glaucoma

Main Article Content

Muhammed S. Alluwim

Keywords

Glaucoma, Quality of life, Visual Function Questionnaire-25, Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, global thickness, Superior and Inferior RNFL thickness

Abstract

Research found associations between quality of life (QoL) scores, structural and functional
measurements in glaucoma. However, structural associations with QoL only used global retinal
nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in which individual sectors may demonstrate more RNFL
thickness loss than the global thickness. We aimed to evaluate the QoL in glaucoma patients and
its association with global, superior and inferior RNFL thicknesses. We recruited 30 glaucoma
patients to conduct a self-report questionnaire to assess their QoL. We also evaluated the
association between the questionnaire scores and the global, superior and inferior RNFL
thicknesses as we retrospectively analyzed them in patients and in age-similar controls. Because
the QoL reduction was in percentages, we converted the RNFL thickness loss to percentages, as
compared to 30 healthy participants. We found that the most affected category of the QoL by
glaucoma was role difficulties (44.73% loss) while the least was color vision (10% loss). The
strongest association was between the QoL scores and global RNFL thickness (R2 = 0.34), followed
by the association with the inferior sector (R2 = 0.28). We demonstrated the glaucoma effect on
the QoL, indicating that early and accurate diagnosis should be potentially implemented to
reduce the consequences of glaucoma. We also showed that global and inferior RNFL thicknesses
may help understand the association between the QoL scores and the RNFL thickness.

Abstract 76 | pdf Downloads 87

References

1. Haymes SA, LeBlanc RP, Nicolela MT, et
al. Glaucoma and on-road driving performance.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(7):3035-41.
2. Ramulu P. Glaucoma and disability:
which tasks are affected, and at what stage of
disease? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(2):92-
8.
3. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global
prevalence of glaucoma and projections of
glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology.
2014;121(11):2081-90.
4. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et
al. Development of the 25-item National Eye
Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch
Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):1050-8.
5. Gutierrez P, Wilson MR, Johnson C, et al.
Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on
health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol.
1997;115(6):777-84.
6. Freeman EE, Muñoz B, West SK, et al.
Glaucoma and quality of life: the Salisbury Eye
Evaluation. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(2):233-8.
7. Richman J, Lorenzana LL, Lankaranian
D, et al. Relationships in glaucoma patients
between standard vision tests, quality of life, and
ability to perform daily activities. Ophthalmic
Epidemiol. 2010;17(3):144-51.
8. Wei H, Sawchyn AK, Myers JS, et al. A
clinical method to assess the effect of visual loss
on the ability to perform activities of daily living.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):735-41.
9. Ekici F, Loh R, Waisbourd M, et al.
Relationships Between Measures of the Ability to
Perform Vision-Related Activities, Vision-Related
Quality of Life, and Clinical Findings in Patients
With Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol.
2015;133(12):1377-85.
10. Sun Y, Lin C, Waisbourd M, et al. The
Impact of Visual Field Clusters on Performancebased Measures and Vision-Related Quality of
Life in Patients With Glaucoma. Am J
Ophthalmol. 2016;163:45-52.
11. Abe RY, Diniz-Filho A, Costa VP, et al.
The Impact of Location of Progressive Visual
Field Loss on Longitudinal Changes in Quality of
Life of Patients with Glaucoma. Ophthalmology.
2016;123(3):552-7.
12. Chun YS, Sung KR, Park CK, et al.
Vision-related quality of life according to location
of visual field loss in patients with glaucoma. Acta
Ophthalmol. 2019;97(5):e772-e9.
13. Gracitelli CP, Abe RY, Tatham AJ, et al.
Association between progressive retinal nerve
fiber layer loss and longitudinal change in quality
of life in glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol.
2015;133(4):384-90.
14. Prager AJ, Hood DC, Liebmann JM, et al.
Association of Glaucoma-Related, Optical
Coherence Tomography-Measured Macular
Damage With Vision-Related Quality of Life.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(7):783-8.
15. Garg A, Hood DC, Pensec N, et al.
Macular Damage, as Determined by StructureFunction Staging, Is Associated With Worse
Vision-related Quality of Life in Early Glaucoma.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;194:88-94.
16. Naithani R, Jammal AA, Estrela T, et al.
Association of an Objective Structural and
Functional Reference Standard for Glaucoma
with Quality of Life Outcomes. Ophthalmol
Glaucoma. 2022.
17. Abdelfattah NS, Amgad M, Salama AA,
et al. Development of an Arabic version of the
National Eye Institute Visual Function
Questionnaire as a tool to study eye diseases
patients in Egypt. Int J Ophthalmol.
2014;7(5):891-7.
18. Lisboa R, Chun YS, Zangwill LM, et al.
Association between rates of binocular visual
field loss and vision-related quality of life in
patients with glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol.
2013;131(4):486-94.
19. Nassiri N, Mehravaran S, Nouri-Mahdavi
K, et al. National Eye Institute Visual Function
Questionnaire: usefulness in glaucoma. Optom
Vis Sci. 2013;90(8):745-53.
20. Kong XM, Zhu WQ, Hong JX, et al. Is
glaucoma comprehension associated with
psychological disturbance and vision-related
quality of life for patients with glaucoma? A crosssectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004632.
21. Medeiros FA, Gracitelli CP, Boer ER, et
al. Longitudinal changes in quality of life and rates
of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma
patients. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(2):293-301.
22. Waisbourd M, Sanvicente CT, Coleman
HM, et al. Vision-related Performance and Quality
of Life of Patients With Rapid Glaucoma
Progression. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(3):216-22.
23. Blumberg DM, De Moraes CG, Prager
AJ, et al. Association Between Undetected 10-2
Visual Field Damage and Vision-Related Quality
of Life in Patients With Glaucoma. JAMA
Ophthalmol. 2017;135(7):742-7.
24. Hood DC, Fortune B, Arthur SN, et al.
Blood vessel contributions to retinal nerve fiber
layer thickness profiles measured with optical
coherence tomography. J Glaucoma.
2008;17(7):519-28.
25. Patel NB, Luo X, Wheat JL, et al. Retinal
nerve fiber layer assessment: area versus
thickness measurements from elliptical scans
centered on the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci. 2011;52(5):2477-89.
26. Chauhan BC, Sharpe GP, Hutchison DM.
Imaging of the temporal raphe with optical
coherence tomography. Ophthalmology.
2014;121(11):2287-8