CT-DERIVED AIRWAY ANATOMY AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH DIFFICULT MASK VENTILATION AND INTUBATION: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
CT airway anatomy, difficult mask ventilation, difficult intubation, glottic cross-sectional area, preoperative airway assessment, Bihar
Abstract
Background:Preoperative airway assessment remains one of the most critical responsibilities of an anaesthesiologist. Traditional clinical tools including the modified Mallampati test (MMT), thyromental distance (TMD), and body mass index (BMI) show variable sensitivity and specificity in predicting difficult mask ventilation (DMV) and difficult intubation (DI). Computed tomography (CT) of the neck and chest allows direct, objective measurement of airway anatomy. However, its routine preoperative application in predicting airway difficulty has not been systematically studied in the north Bihar region of India.
Objectives:To determine whether specific CT-derived airway anatomical parameters — including minimum glottic cross-sectional area (mGCSA), subglottic diameter, anteroposterior pharyngeal distance, and prevertebral soft tissue thickness — are independently associated with difficult mask ventilation and difficult intubation in adult surgical patients.
Methodology:A retrospective observational study was conducted from April 2025 to September 2025 at Radha Devi Jageshwari Memorial Medical College & Hospital, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. Records of 120 adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia and had a preoperative CT neck/chest scan were reviewed. CT measurements and intraoperative airway management records were extracted and analysed using SPSS v25. Logistic regression was employed to identify independent CT predictors.
Results:Of 120 patients, DMV occurred in 21 (17.5%) and DI in 18 (15.0%). Reduced mGCSA (≤120 mm²; OR 4.82, 95% CI 1.94–11.97, p=0.001), narrow subglottic transverse diameter (≤12 mm; OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.45–9.48, p=0.006), and increased prevertebral soft tissue thickness (≥7 mm; OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.21–8.42, p=0.019) were independently associated with difficult intubation. Reduced anteroposterior pharyngeal distance (≤11 mm; OR 4.11, 95% CI 1.62–10.44, p=0.003) was the strongest independent predictor of DMV.
Conclusion:CT-derived airway anatomical parameters, particularly minimum glottic cross-sectional area and anteroposterior pharyngeal distance, are significant independent predictors of airway difficulty and may supplement conventional clinical assessment, especially in high-risk surgical populations in resource-constrained tertiary settings.
References
2. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(1):31–81.
3. Kheterpal S, Han R, Tremper KK, Shanks A, Tait AR, O'Reilly M, Ludwig TA. Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2006;105(5):885–891.
4. Kheterpal S, Martin L, Shanks AM, Tremper KK. Prediction and outcomes of impossible mask ventilation: A review of 50,000 anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(4):891–897.
5. Khan M, Siddiqui AS, Raza SA, Samad K. Incidence and predictors of difficult mask ventilation in high-risk adult population scheduled for elective surgery: A prospective observational study. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e22002.
6. Comparison Between Mathematical and Software Calculation Methods for the Measurement of the Cross-Sectional Area in Upper Airway Imaging. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(2):577–582.
7. Morpho-Volumetric Changes of the Pharyngeal Airway With Traumatic Maxillofacial Injuries: A Retrospective Radiographic Study. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e47399.
8. Ren H, Qu L, Shi W, Zhao W, et al. CT based 3D radiomic and clinical airway examination model for evaluating mask ventilation in oral and maxillofacial surgery patients. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):6789.
9. Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, Guggiari M, Bianchi A, Coriat P, Riou B. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(5):1229–1236.
10. Shah PN, Sundaram V. Incidence and predictors of difficult mask ventilation and intubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28(4):451–455.
11. Nagaura M, Saitoh K, Tsujimoto G, Yasuda A, Shionoya Y, Sunada K, Kawai T. Usefulness of preoperative computed tomography findings for airway management in patients with acute odontogenic infection: A retrospective study. Odontology. 2023;111(2):499–510.
12. Adnet F, Baillard C, Borron SW, Denantes C, Lefebvre L, Galinski M, et al. Randomized study comparing the 'sniffing position' with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(4):836–841.
13. Han R, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S, O'Reilly M. Grading scale for mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(1):267.
14. Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: A retrospective study. Anaesthesia. 1987;42(5):487–490.
15. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: A prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985;32(4):429–434.
16. Udayakumar GS, Priya L, Narayanan V. Comparison of ultrasound parameters and clinical parameters in airway assessment for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation: An observational study. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41392.
17. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39(11):1105–1111.
18. Rugnath N, Rexrode LE, Kurnutala LN. Unanticipated difficult airway during elective surgery: A case report and review of literature. Cureus. 2022;14(12):e32996.
19. Ramachandran SK, Mathis MR, Tremper KK, Shanks AM, Kheterpal S. Predictors and clinical outcomes from failed laryngeal mask airway unique™: A study of 11,910 patients. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(6):1217–1226.
20. Rao S, Paliwal N, Saharan S, Bihani P, Jaju R, Sharma UD, Sharma M. A comparative study to evaluate difficult intubation using ratio of patient height to thyromental distance, ratio of neck circumference to thyromental distance, and thyromental height in adult patients in tertiary care centre. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2023;51(2):90–96.
21. Bhagavan S, Nelamangala K. Accuracy of preoperative ultrasonographic airway assessment in predicting difficult laryngoscopies in adult patients. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e35652.
22. Shi Y, Gu M, Zhang X, Wen M, Li R, Wang Y, et al. Diagnostic value of upper airway morphological data based on CT volume scanning combined with clinical indexes in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Front Med. 2023;10:1150321.
23. de Oliveira JTM, Medeiros H, Andrino W. Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and predictors of difficult orotracheal intubation. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2024;70(9):e20240347.
24. Khan MN, Ahmed A. Accuracy of STOP-Bang questionnaire in predicting difficult mask ventilation: An observational study. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e15955.
25. Park SY, Kim JA, Lee JH, Jeong JS, Lim YJ. Development and validation of a difficult laryngoscopy prediction model using machine learning of neck circumference and thyromental height. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21(1):117.
26. Wong IH, Izaham A, Sayed Masri SNN, Maaya M, Mohamad Mahdi SN, Abd Kader KN, et al. Ultrasonography assessment of neck anatomy for prediction of difficult mask ventilation in obese patients: A prospective observational study. Diagnostics. 2025;15(13):1615.
27. [Krihnamoorthy DGSR, Devendra Prasad KJ, Rajesh K, Nikhil Reddy Y, Aravind SR. Unlocking airway predictability: The role of ultrasound in assessing Cormack-Lehane grade through anterior neck soft tissue thickness at the level of vocal cords and hyoid bone. J Intensive Care Med. 2025.
28. Ahmad I, El-Boghdadly K, Bhagrath R, Hodzovic I, McNarry AF, Mir F, et al. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for awake tracheal intubation (ATI) in adults. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(4):509–528.
29. Prasad A, Yu E, Wong DT, Karkhanis R, Gullane P, Chan VW. Comparison of sonography and computed tomography as imaging tools for assessment of airway structures. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(7):965–972.
30. Marchis IF, Negrut MF, Blebea CM, Crihan M, Alexa AL, Breazu CM. Trends in preoperative airway assessment. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(6):535.
31. Roh JL, Kim H, Jang I, Lee JH, Cho KJ. Risk factors for difficult mask ventilation and difficult intubation among patients undergoing pharyngeal and laryngeal surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023;132(3):263–270.
32. Kar S, Senapati LK, Samanta P, Satapathy GC. Predictive value of modified Mallampati test and upper lip bite test concerning Cormack and Lehane's laryngoscopy grading in the anticipation of difficult intubation: A cross-sectional study at a tertiary care hospital, Bhubaneswar, India. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e28754.
33. Thiruvenkatarajan V, Meyer EJ, Nanjappa N, Van Wijk RM, Currie J. Perioperative difficult airway management in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018;34(3):303–311.
34. \El-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: Predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg. 1996;82(6):1197–1204.
35. Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Astrup G, Afshari A, Lundstrøm LH. Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists' prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: A cohort study of 188,064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(3):272–281.
36. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C, Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: Results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(5):617–631.

