RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HAND DOMINANCE, FOREARM MUSCLE MORPHOMETRY AND GRIP STRENGTH: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY FROM EASTERN INDIA
Main Article Content
Keywords
Grip strength, hand dominance, forearm muscle morphometry, ultrasound, Eastern India
Abstract
Grip strength is a vital indicator of overall muscle strength and functional capacity. The relationship between hand dominance, forearm muscle morphometry, and grip strength remains incompletely understood in the Indian population, particularly in Eastern India.
Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between hand dominance and forearm muscle morphometry with grip strength among healthy adults in Muzaffarpur, Bihar.
Methodology: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Radha Devi Jageshwari Memorial Medical College & Hospital, Muzaffarpur, Bihar from January 2025 to June 2025. A total of 180 healthy adults (age 18-35 years) were recruited through convenient sampling. Hand dominance was assessed using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Grip strength was measured using a calibrated Jamar hand dynamometer, and forearm muscle thickness was evaluated using ultrasound imaging (7-12 MHz linear probe). Anthropometric measurements including forearm length and circumference were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0 with paired t-tests, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis.
Results: The mean grip strength in the dominant hand (38.4 ± 7.2 kg in males, 24.8
± 4.6 kg in females) was significantly higher than the non-dominant hand (34.7 ± 6.8 kg in males, 22.1 ± 4.2 kg in females; p<0.001). Forearm flexor muscle thickness showed strong positive correlation with grip strength (r=0.72, p<0.001). The dominant hand exhibited 8.2% greater muscle thickness compared to the non-dominant side (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Hand dominance significantly influences grip strength and forearm muscle morphometry. These findings have important implications for rehabilitation protocols and normative data establishment for the Eastern Indian population.
References
91. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S194543
2. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Avezum A Jr, Orlandini A, et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):266-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6
3. Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011;40(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr051
4. Mitsionis G, Pakos EE, Stafilas KS, Paschos N, Papakostas T, Beris AE. Normative data on hand grip strength in a Greek adult population. Int Orthop. 2009;33(3):713-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0551-x
5. Fukunaga T, Miyatani M, Tachi M, Kouzaki M, Kawakami Y, Kanehisa H. Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001;172(4):249-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201x.2001.00867.x
6. Bemben MG. Use of diagnostic ultrasound for assessing muscle size. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(1):103-8.
7. Papadatou-Pastou M, Ntolka E, Schmitz J, Martin M, Munafò MR, Ocklenburg S, et al. Human handedness: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2020;146(6):481-524. doi: 10.1037/bul0000229
8. Petersen P, Petrick M, Connor H, Conklin D. Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;43(7):444-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.43.7.444
9. Armstrong CA, Oldham JA. A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;24(4):421-5. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.1999.0236
10. Luna-Heredia E, Martin-Pena G, Ruiz-Galiana J. Handgrip dynamometry in healthy adults. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(2):250-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.10.007
11. Sartorio A, Lafortuna CL, Pogliaghi S, Trecate L. The impact of gender, body dimension and body composition on hand-grip strength in healthy children. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002;25(5):431-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03344033
12. Bohannon RW, Peolsson A, Massy-Westropp N, Desrosiers J, Bear-Lehman J. Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2006;92(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2005.05.003
13. Shim JK, Lay BS, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML. Age-related changes in finger coordination in static prehension tasks. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97(1):213-24. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00045.2004
14. Kumar V, Sharma RK, Gupta N, Singh A. Correlation between hand grip strength and forearm muscle thickness in young Indian adults: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2023;67(2):112-8.
15. Martinez-Rodriguez A, Garcia-de-Alcaraz A, Vicente-Martinez M, Sanchis-Sanchis R, Perez-Turpin JA, Cortell-Tormo JM. Relationship between forearm muscle thickness and handgrip strength: An ultrasound study. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(6):854. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060854
16. Zhang L, Li C, Wang Y, Chen M. Hand dominance and grip strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0272644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272644
17. Sharma R, Kumar A, Singh D, Verma SK. Gender differences in grip strength and its correlation with anthropometric variables in young adults. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023;12(3):542-7. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1678_22
18. Lee SH, Kim HS. Normative values of hand grip strength in Korean adults: Results from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-2019. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2022;26(2):163-71. doi: 10.4235/agmr.22.0024
19. Rahman SA, Hossain MM, Islam MS, Ahmed F. Hand grip strength and its determinants in Bangladeshi adults: Findings from a nationally representative survey. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15345-w
20. Thompson BJ, Ryan ED, Herda TJ, Costa PB, Herda AA, Cramer JT. Consistency of rapid muscle onset and muscular performance in recreationally trained males and females. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2012;12(1):14-23.
21. Reeves ND, Maganaris CN, Narici MV. Ultrasonographic assessment of human skeletal muscle size. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;91(1):116-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0961-9
22. Oliveira FB, Oliveira AS, Rizatto GF, Denadai BS. Resistance training for strength and muscle thickness: Effect of number of sets and muscle group trained. Sci Sports. 2009;24(5):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2009.01.005
23. Singh T, Kumar A, Verma R. Occupational influence on handgrip strength among rural and urban workers in North India. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2023;29(2):678-84. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2022.2074347
24. Das A, Bose K, Saha SP. Association between handgrip strength and metabolic syndrome among young adults: Findings from eastern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2024;18(1):CC01-CC04.
25. Verma AK, Singh RK, Kumar P. Assessment of handgrip strength among medical students in Patna: A preliminary study. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2022;12(8):1245-9. doi: 10.5455/njppp.2022.12.05123202228052022
26. Roberts JD, Meyer P, Cooper D, O'Connor W, Potter MN. Standardization of grip strength measurement: A validation study of alternative protocols. J Hand Ther. 2023;36(2):245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.08.005
27. Chen Y, Wang H, Li J, Zhang X. Anthropometric predictors of handgrip strength: A multiple regression analysis in Chinese adults. Ergonomics. 2022;65(11):1456-65. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2053595
28. Anderson T, Hagglund M, Waldén M. Hand grip strength asymmetry in professional athletes: Comparison across sports and training interventions. J Sports Sci. 2023;41(8):763-71. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2023.2196344
29. Kumar S, Reddy KS. Comparison of traditional and digital dynamometry for grip strength assessment: A validation study. Indian J Occup Ther. 2024;56(1):12-7.
30. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
31. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9(2):222-6. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80146-x

