EVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF INTRAOPERATIVE FROZEN SECTIONS FOR MARGIN ASSESSMENT IN ORAL CANCER SURGERY: A STUDY FROM A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Main Article Content

Pankaj Chauhan
Surabhi Pandey
Akanksha
Tanu Agrawal

Keywords

.

Abstract

Background: Complete excision of malignant cells offers the best chance of cure in oral cancer, but microscopic tumor spread cannot be detected visually or by palpation. Hence, intraoperative frozen section analysis is commonly used to assess surgical margins, providing rapid diagnosis, margin evaluation, and guidance on malignancy status and lymph node dissection.


 


OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the role of frozen section diagnosis as a guide in resection of surgical margins of oral cancer.


 


MATERIAL AND METHOD: This retrospective study included 52 patients (264 margins) with oral carcinoma who underwent surgical resection at SRMS-IMS. Frozen sections were examined immediately for margins and later compared with hematoxylin and eosin-stained paraffin sections. Patients with prior oral cancer, previous treatments, or no positive histopathology were excluded. Margins were classified as positive (tumor present), close (between 1 - 5 mm) or negative (≥5 mm).


 


RESULT:  Out of 52 samples received and with a total of 264 margins examined, the intraoperative frozen section demonstrated a sensitivity of approximately 79% and a specificity of about 98%. The positive predictive value was 86%, and the negative predictive value was 98%.


 


CONCLUSION: In our evaluation, we concluded that frozen section is a valuable intraoperative tool with high specificity but moderate sensitivity. It aids in identifying positive margins, allowing timely revision during surgery.


 

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249.
2. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Laversanne M, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I, Bray F. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: IARC; 2022.
3. Shah JP, Gil Z. The current concepts on the surgical management of oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(4-5):394-401.
4. Sutton DN, Brown JS, Rogers SN, et al. The prognostic implications of the surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(1):30-34.
5. Woolgar JA, Triantafyllou A. A systematic review of the prognostic implications of the surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2017;72:50-59.
6. Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak TF, et al. Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (# 9501). Head Neck. 2005;27(10):843-850.
7. DiNardo LJ, Lin J, Karageorge LS, et al. Accuracy, utility, and cost of frozen section margins in head and neck cancer surgery. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(10 Pt 1):1773-1776.
8. Bulbul MG, Cicek E, Tatli U, et al. Does intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in oral cancer surgery really affect the local recurrence? A meta-analysis. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;24(3):249-257.
9. Long SM, McLean T, Patel S, et al. Use of Intraoperative Frozen Section to Assess Final Tumor Margin Status in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;148(10):929–936.
10. Kumar A, Sharma S, Mohil RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for margin evaluation of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Res Notes. 2024;17(1):112.
11. Alvi A, Johnson JT. The role of frozen section in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;4(2):93-96.