THE ROLE OF MIRROR NEURON SYSTEM ACTIVATION IN FACILITATING GOAL-DIRECTED ACTION OBSERVATION THERAPY FOR CHILDREN WITH UNILATERAL CEREBRAL PALSY

Main Article Content

Mohan Nallathambi
Nagendran Thangavelu
Muthukumaran Calyanasundaram
Neethi.M
Tanigaiselvane.D.J
Mrs. Ipshita Mou
Mrs. Jeyanthi

Keywords

Mirror Neuron System, Action Observation Therapy, Cerebral Palsy, Pediatric Neurorehabilitation, fMRI, Upper Extremity, Neuroplasticity

Abstract

Background: Action Observation Therapy (AOT) shows promise in pediatric neurorehabilitation for improving upper limb function. Its proposed mechanism, mirror neuron system (MNS) activation, is largely inferred from adult studies, creating a significant evidence gap in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP).


Objective: This study aimed to directly measure MNS activation via functional MRI (fMRI) in children with UCP during a goal-directed AOT paradigm and correlate it with functional motor improvements.


Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 30 children with UCP (ages 6-12, MACS I-III) were allocated to either AOT (n=15) or control (n=15) groups. The AOT group observed goal-directed actions followed by physical practice, while the control group observed geometric shapes followed by the same practice. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included fMRI scans during action observation and the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) and Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2) for functional evaluation.


Results: The AOT group demonstrated significantly greater activation in key MNS regions (inferior frontal gyrus, premotor cortex, inferior parietal lobule) on fMRI (p < 0.001, FWE-corrected). This was coupled with significantly greater improvement on the AHA (mean difference +5.6 points, p=0.002) and MA2 (mean difference +7.1%, p=0.005) compared to the control group. A strong positive correlation was found between the change in MNS activation and the change in AHA scores (r = 0.78, p < 0.001).


Conclusion: This study provides the first direct evidence in a pediatric population that functional gains from goal-directed AOT are mediated by the activation of the MNS. It validates AOT as a neuroplasticity-based intervention and underscores the importance of goal-directed action observation in designing effective rehabilitation protocols for children with UCP.

Abstract 20 | Pdf Downloads 29

References

1. Bisio, A., Avanzino, L., Lagravinese, G., Biggio, M., Ruggeri, P., & Bove, M. (2015). The role of the mirror neuron system in motor learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 414. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00414
2. Buccino, G., Solodkin, A., & Small, S. L. (2006). Functions of the mirror neuron system: Implications for neurorehabilitation. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 19(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/00146965-200603000-00009
3. Celnik, P., Webster, B., Glasser, D. M., & Cohen, L. G. (2008). Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke. Stroke, 39(6), 1814-1820. https://doi.org/10.1161/ STROKEAHA.107.508184
4. Dinomais, M., Groeschel, S., Staudt, M., Krägeloh-Mann, I., & Wilke, M. (2016). Long term motor function after neonatal stroke: Lesion localization above all. Human Brain Mapping, 37(12), 4793-4806. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23345
5. Ertelt, D., Small, S., Solodkin, A., Dettmers, C., McNamara, A., Binkofski, F., & Buccino, G. (2007). Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. NeuroImage, 36(Suppl 2), T164-T173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.043
6. Franceschini, M., Ceravolo, M. G., Agosti, M., Cavallini, P., Bonassi, S., Dall'Armi, V., ... & Sale, P. (2012). Clinical relevance of action observation in upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: A possible role in recovery of functional dexterity. A randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 26(5), 456-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1545968311427406
7. Garry, M. I., Loftus, A., & Summers, J. J. (2005). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Experimental Brain Research, 163(1), 118-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2226-9
8. Johnston, M. V. (2009). Plasticity in the developing brain: Implications for rehabilitation. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15(2), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.64
9. Kirkpatrick, E., Pearse, J., James, P., & Basu, A. (2016). Effect of parent-delivered action observation therapy on upper limb function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 58(10), 1049-1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13156
10. Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., Holmefur, M., Kottorp, A., & Eliasson, A. C. (2007). The Assisting Hand Assessment: Current evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49(4), 259-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00259.x
11. Molenberghs, P., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2012). Brain regions with mirror properties: A meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(1), 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.004
12. Novak, I., Morgan, C., Adde, L., Blackman, J., Boyd, R. N., Brunstrom-Hernandez, J., ... & Badawi, N. (2017). Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: Advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA Pediatrics, 171(9), 897-907. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jamapediatrics.2017.1689
13. Oskoui, M., Coutinho, F., Dykeman, J., Jetté, N., & Pringsheim, T. (2013). An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 55(6), 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12080
14. Randall, M., Carlin, J. B., Chondros, P., & Reddihough, D. (2012). Reliability of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 43(11), 761-767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2001.tb00162.x
15. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
16. Sakzewski, L., Ziviani, J., & Boyd, R. N. (2014). Efficacy of upper limb therapies for unilateral cerebral palsy: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 133(1), e175-e204. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds. 2013-0675
17. Sgandurra, G., Ferrari, A., Cossu, G., Guzzetta, A., Biagi, L., Tosetti, M., ... & Cioni, G. (2013). Upper limb children action-observation training (UP-CAT): A randomised controlled trial in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. BMC Neurology, 13, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-76
18. Shimada, S., & Hiraki, K. (2006). Infant's brain responses to live and televised action. NeuroImage, 32(2), 930-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.044
19. Staudt, M. (2010). Brain plasticity following early life brain injury: Insights from neuroimaging. Seminars in Perinatology, 34(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi. 2009.10.009