COMPARISON BETWEEN EFFECTIVENESS OF NON-NASOGASTRIC INTUBATION AND NASOGASTRIC INTUBATION IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Main Article Content

Dr. Durdana Mohsin
Dr. Hoordana Riaz
Dr. Sana Bahar
Dr. Shukry Naimatullah
Dr. Mairaj Barkat Ali
Dr. Sassi Manzoor Hassan
Dr. Ejaz Ul Haq
Sana Ullah Kakar

Keywords

Small Intestinal Obstruction, Nasogastric Intubation, Nasogastric Decompression, Conservative Management, Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Small intestinal obstruction (SIO) remains one of the most common surgical emergencies encountered in clinical practice, particularly in developing countries. Conservative management has been the standard approach for uncomplicated cases, with nasogastric (NG) decompression traditionally being a central component. However, the necessity and superiority of NG decompression in improving patient outcomes remains debated.


Objective: To compare the effectiveness of conservative management of small intestinal obstruction with and without the use of nasogastric intubation and to evaluate whether NG decompression should remain a standard component of non-operative care.


Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted over six months at Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan. One hundred patients aged between 18 to 60 years with radiologically confirmed SIO were randomized into two groups: Group A received standard conservative management along with NG intubation, while Group B received standard management without NG decompression. Effectiveness was measured based on clinical resolution of two or more symptoms: abdominal distension, absolute constipation, and absent gut sounds. Hospital stays, symptom resolution rate, and complication incidence were analyzed. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.


Results: The average age was 41.3±11.1 years, and 58% were male. Group A (NG group) showed significantly shorter hospital stays (3.84±1.57 days) compared to Group B (4.64±1.52 days) (p=0.011). Treatment effectiveness was higher in the NG group (82%) compared to the non-NG group (40%) (p<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed consistent superiority of NG decompression across age, gender, and clinical characteristics. Minor complications were more common in the NG group but did not outweigh the benefits.


Conclusion: Nasogastric decompression significantly enhances conservative treatment outcomes in patients with SIO. Despite minor discomfort, its effectiveness in symptom resolution and reduction in hospital stay supports its routine use in non-operative settings.

Abstract 159 | Pdf Downloads 62

References

1. Behman, R., Nathens, A. B., Look Hong, N. J., Pechlivanoglou, P., Karanicolas, P. J., & Coburn, N. G. (2017). Association of surgical intervention for adhesive small-bowel obstruction with the risk of recurrence. JAMA Surgery, 152(4), 329–335.
2. Catena, F., De Simone, B., Coccolini, F., Di Saverio, S., Sartelli, M., Ansaloni, L., ... & Kluger, Y. (2019). Bowel obstruction: a narrative review for all physicians. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 14(1), 1–18.
3. Ceresoli, M., Coccolini, F., Catena, F., Montori, G., Ansaloni, L., & Sartelli, M. (2017). Adhesive small bowel obstruction: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical aspects. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 106(2), 117–125.
4. Chen, Y. T., Wang, Y. Y., Lin, H. C., & Huang, Y. T. (2010). Timing of surgery in small bowel obstruction: a population-based study. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 16(7), 748–753.
5. Cuschieri, A., Grace, P. A., & Darzi, A. (1998). Clinical surgery. Wiley-Blackwell.
6. Deitch, E. A. (1998). Bacterial translocation of the gut flora. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 44(1), 21–27.
7. Di Saverio, S., Coccolini, F., Galati, M., Smerieri, N., Biffl, W. L., Ansaloni, L., & Catena, F. (2013). Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 8(1), 1–12.
8. Ellis, H. (2007). The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction. The European Journal of Surgery, 589(1), 5–9.
9. Fevang, B. T., Fevang, J., Lie, S. A., Søreide, O., Svanes, K., & Viste, A. (2004). Long-term prognosis after operation for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Annals of Surgery, 240(2), 193–201.
10. Foster, N. M., McGory, M. L., Zingmond, D. S., & Ko, C. Y. (2006). Small bowel obstruction: a population-based appraisal. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 203(2), 170–176.
11. Hussain, T., Baloch, M. U., & Shah, A. (2021). Nasogastric tube decompression in small bowel obstruction: Is it always necessary? Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 37(3), 881–885.
12. Kearney, K. E., Hamill, J. K., Wynter, C., & Grant, C. C. (2019). Nasogastric tubes in children: Risks and management strategies. American Journal of Surgery, 217(4), 758–764.
13. Krausz, M. M., Moriel, E. Z., & Ayalon, A. (1991). Conservative management of small bowel obstruction in postoperative patients. American Journal of Surgery, 161(3), 307–310.
14. Leung, A. M., Vu, H., & Taylor, S. F. (2009). Obstruction of the small intestine. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 27(5), 551–555.
15. Lappas, J. C., Reyes, B. L., & Maglinte, D. D. (2001). Abdominal radiography findings in small-bowel obstruction: diagnostic importance of air-fluid levels. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, 176(1), 67–70.
16. Maglinte, D. D., Heitkamp, D. E., Howard, T. J., & Kelvin, F. M. (2003). Current concepts in imaging of small bowel obstruction. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 41(2), 263–283.
17. Maung, A. A., Johnson, D. C., Piper, G. L., Barbosa, R. R., Rowell, S. E., Bokhari, F., ... & Streib, E. W. (2012). Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma guideline. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 73(5), S362–S369.
18. Miller, G., Boman, J., Shrier, I., & Gordon, P. H. (2000). Natural history of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. British Journal of Surgery, 87(9), 1240–1247.
19. Mirijanyan, E., Petrosyan, M., Avagyan, A., & Hakobyan, L. (2019). Efficacy of nasogastric decompression in adhesive small bowel obstruction. International Journal of Surgery, 67, 12–16.
20. O'Connor, D. B., Winter, D. C., & Broe, P. J. (2019). Surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. JAMA Surgery, 154(2), 147–148.
21. Silen, W. (1985). Cope's Early Diagnosis of the Acute Abdomen (19th ed.). Oxford University Press.
22. Sosa, J. L., Gardner, B., & Sleeman, D. (1993). Early operation in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a prospective randomized trial. Surgery, 114(4), 857–861.
23. Ten Broek, R. P., Strik, C., Issa, Y., Bleichrodt, R. P., van Goor, H. (2013). Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. The Lancet, 382(9895), 1028–1035.
24. Van den Heuvel, B., van den Broek, W. T., van Tets, W. F., Veenhof, A. A., van der Harst, E., & Bonjer, H. J. (2003). Is laparoscopic surgery feasible in patients with small bowel obstruction? Surgical Endoscopy, 17(11), 1779–1783.
25. Zielinski, M. D., & Bannon, M. P. (2015). Current management of small bowel obstruction. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 28(4), 209–217.
26. Zielinski, M. D., Eiken, P. W., Bannon, M. P., Heller, S. F., Lohse, C. M., & Huebner, M. (2011). Small bowel obstruction–who needs an operation? A multivariate prediction model. World Journal of Surgery, 35(5), 910–919.

Most read articles by the same author(s)