CORRELATION OF CENTRAL MACULAR THICKNESS ON OCT FOLLOWING PANRETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION WITH HBA1C AMONG DIABETIC PATIENTS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), Optical coherence tomography
Abstract
Background: PDR is defined as the formation of new retinal vessels due to poor glycemic control patients with diabetes mellitus .Among the risk factors, one of the most significant risk factor that predicts this complication is the long term hyperglycemia with the long duration of disease, that ultimately causes the development of advance diabetic eye disease .The definite treatment of PDR is via PRP laser , that reduce oxygen demand of retinal tissue and prevents further ischemic mediated damage.
Objective: Find out any change in the CMT and its correlation with HbA1c following PRP by OCT macula among patients with PDR.
Methods: This study was conducted at the department of Ophthalmology, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Services Hospital Lahore, Pakistan. Study period was of six months from December 2023 to June 2024. This study included a total of fourty eyes from fourty patients with diagnosed proliferative diabetic retinopathy , study participants were divided into two groups, Group mA with HbA1c below 7.5% comprising of twenty patients , and group B comprising of twenty patients with HbA1c between 8.5 and 9.0%, both study groups were treated with pan retinal photocoagulation performed in single session with 1500 laser burn spots This laser treatment was followed by Optical coherence tomography , four weeks after the sessions. Central macular thickness was measured for a change before and after PRP laser sessions.
Results: In our study, patients had a mean age of 48.71±2.42 years, ,the measured mean baseline CMT before the PRP laser sessions was recorded at baseline thickness of 230.45±5.0 and four weeks after the PRP session ,the mean CMT value was 238.50±5.30 among patients in group A and 257±3.5 microns among group B patients. (p-value of 0.001)
Conclusion: There was no statistically proven significant change found in macular thickness before and after PRP session upto to four weeks of follow-up via OCT macula
References
2. Shaikh A, Shaikh F, Shaikh ZA, Ahmed J. Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and influence factors among newly diagnosed Diabetics in Rural and Urban Areas of Pakistan: Data analysis from the Pakistan National Blindness & Visual Impairment Survey 2003. Pak J Med Sci. 2008;24:774–779.
3. Chaudhary GM. Retinopathy in diabetic patients. Pak J Med Res. 2005;44:82–87
4. Kanski JJ. Clinical ophthalmology: a systematic approach. 6th Ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Limited; 2007. p. 582.
5. Mahar PS, Awan MZ, Manzar N, Memon MS. Prevalence of type-II diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy: the Gaddap study. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Aug 1;20(8):528-32.
6. Kanski JJ. Clinical ophthalmology: a systematic approach. 6th Ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Limited; 2007. p. 582.
7. Samuel NE, Krishnagopal S. Foveal and macular thickness evaluation by spectral OCT SLO and its relation with axial length in various degree of myopia. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2015;9(3):NC01.
8. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy, XII: The 14-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy and associated risk factors in type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1801–1815.
9. M. Shimura, K. Yasuda, T. Nakazawa, and M. Tamai, “Visual dysfunction after panretinal photocoagulation in patients with severe diabetic retinopathy and good vision,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 8.e1–8.e10, 2005.
10. M. Soman, S. Ganekal, U. Nair, and K. G. R. Nair, “Effect of panretinal photocoagulation on macular morphology and thickness in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy without clinically significant macular edema,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2013–2017, 2012.
11. A. Nonaka, J. Kiryu, A. Tsujikawa et al., “Inflammatory response after scatter laser photocoagulation in nonphotocoagulated retina,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1204–1209, 2002.
12. A. Jain, M. S. Blumenkranz, Y. Paulus et al., “Effect of pulse duration on size and character of the lesion in retinal photocoagulation,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2008.
13. Yilmaz T, Yilmaz A. Long-term changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness and central macula thickness after Nd: YAG laser capsulotomy. International ophthalmology 2017;37(4):1003-8.
14. D. Palanker, D. Lavinsky, M. S. Blumenkranz, and G. Marcellino, “The impact of pulse duration and burn grade on size of retinal photocoagulation lesion: implications for pattern density,” Retina, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1664–1669, 2011.
15. M. M. K. Muqit, J. C. B. Gray, G. R. Marcellino et al., “In vivo laser-tissue interactions and healing responses from 20- vs 100-millisecond pulse pascal photocoagulation burns,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 448–455, 2010.