CORRELATION OF CENTRAL MACULAR THICKNESS ON OCT FOLLOWING PANRETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION WITH HBA1C AMONG DIABETIC PATIENTS

Main Article Content

Muhammad Hamza Shahid
Muhammad Mueen Bhatti
Tehmina Imdad
Muhammad Nasrullah Khan
Khawaja Mohsin Ihsan
Saqib Siddiq

Keywords

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), Optical coherence tomography

Abstract

Background: PDR is defined as  the formation of  new retinal vessels  due to poor glycemic control  patients with diabetes mellitus .Among the risk factors, one of the most significant risk factor  that predicts this complication is the  long term hyperglycemia with the long  duration of  disease, that ultimately  causes the development of  advance diabetic eye disease .The definite treatment of PDR is via PRP laser  , that reduce oxygen demand of retinal tissue and prevents further ischemic mediated damage.


Objective: Find out any change in the CMT and its correlation with HbA1c following PRP by OCT   macula among patients with PDR.


Methods: This study was conducted at the department of Ophthalmology, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Services Hospital Lahore, Pakistan. Study period was of six months from December 2023 to June 2024. This study included a total of fourty eyes from fourty patients with diagnosed proliferative diabetic retinopathy , study participants were divided into two groups, Group mA with HbA1c below 7.5% comprising of  twenty  patients , and group B comprising of twenty  patients with HbA1c between 8.5 and 9.0%, both study  groups  were treated with   pan retinal photocoagulation performed  in single session with 1500 laser  burn spots This laser treatment was followed by Optical coherence tomography , four weeks after the sessions. Central macular thickness was measured for a change before and after PRP laser sessions.


Results: In our study, patients had a mean age of  48.71±2.42 years, ,the measured  mean baseline CMT  before the PRP laser sessions was recorded at baseline  thickness  of 230.45±5.0 and four weeks after the PRP session ,the  mean CMT value was  238.50±5.30 among patients in  group A and 257±3.5 microns among group B patients. (p-value of 0.001)


Conclusion: There was no statistically proven significant change found in macular thickness   before and after PRP session upto to four weeks of follow-up via OCT macula

Abstract 95 | PDF Downloads 103

References

1. Buch H, Vinding T, Cour M, Appleyard M, Jensen GB, Nielsen NV. Prevalence and Causes of Visual Impairment and Blindness among 9980 Scandinavian Adults: The Copenhagen City Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003;111(1):53–61.
2. Shaikh A, Shaikh F, Shaikh ZA, Ahmed J. Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and influence factors among newly diagnosed Diabetics in Rural and Urban Areas of Pakistan: Data analysis from the Pakistan National Blindness & Visual Impairment Survey 2003. Pak J Med Sci. 2008;24:774–779.
3. Chaudhary GM. Retinopathy in diabetic patients. Pak J Med Res. 2005;44:82–87
4. Kanski JJ. Clinical ophthalmology: a systematic approach. 6th Ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Limited; 2007. p. 582.
5. Mahar PS, Awan MZ, Manzar N, Memon MS. Prevalence of type-II diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy: the Gaddap study. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Aug 1;20(8):528-32.
6. Kanski JJ. Clinical ophthalmology: a systematic approach. 6th Ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Limited; 2007. p. 582.
7. Samuel NE, Krishnagopal S. Foveal and macular thickness evaluation by spectral OCT SLO and its relation with axial length in various degree of myopia. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2015;9(3):NC01.
8. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy, XII: The 14-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy and associated risk factors in type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1801–1815.
9. M. Shimura, K. Yasuda, T. Nakazawa, and M. Tamai, “Visual dysfunction after panretinal photocoagulation in patients with severe diabetic retinopathy and good vision,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 8.e1–8.e10, 2005.
10. M. Soman, S. Ganekal, U. Nair, and K. G. R. Nair, “Effect of panretinal photocoagulation on macular morphology and thickness in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy without clinically significant macular edema,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2013–2017, 2012.
11. A. Nonaka, J. Kiryu, A. Tsujikawa et al., “Inflammatory response after scatter laser photocoagulation in nonphotocoagulated retina,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1204–1209, 2002.
12. A. Jain, M. S. Blumenkranz, Y. Paulus et al., “Effect of pulse duration on size and character of the lesion in retinal photocoagulation,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2008.
13. Yilmaz T, Yilmaz A. Long-term changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness and central macula thickness after Nd: YAG laser capsulotomy. International ophthalmology 2017;37(4):1003-8.
14. D. Palanker, D. Lavinsky, M. S. Blumenkranz, and G. Marcellino, “The impact of pulse duration and burn grade on size of retinal photocoagulation lesion: implications for pattern density,” Retina, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1664–1669, 2011.
15. M. M. K. Muqit, J. C. B. Gray, G. R. Marcellino et al., “In vivo laser-tissue interactions and healing responses from 20- vs 100-millisecond pulse pascal photocoagulation burns,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 448–455, 2010.