COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF ADDING INTRAINCISIONAL MEPERIDINE VERSUS INTRAINCISIONAL TRAMADOL TO BUPIVACAINE IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION UNDER SPINAL ANESTHESIA
Main Article Content
Keywords
Meperidine, Tramadol, Bupivacaine, Analgesia, Cesarean Section
Abstract
Background: Analgesic treatment has traditionally focused on central mechanisms associated with pain perception via the use of opioids. The aim of this work was to evaluate the postoperative analgesic effect of intra-incisional infiltration of meperidine added to bupivacaine versus tramadol added to bupivacaine in elective cesarean section (CS) under spinal anaesthesia.
Methods: This randomised controlled double blinded work had been conducted on 90 healthy full-term patients aged from 20 to 35 years old, planned for elective CS under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were divided into three equal groups: Meperidine Group: obtained 50 mg meperidine with 50 mg bupivacaine, Tramadol Group: received 50 mg tramadol with 50 mg bupivacaine and Bupivacaine Group: obtained 50 mg bupivacaine
Results: The amount of morphine given postoperative was significantly decreased in meperidine group and tramadol group than bupivacaine group (P≤0.001). The time of first dosage of morphine given postoperatively had been earlier in bupivacaine group contrasted to tramadol group than meperidine group (P<0.05). Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure at the studied times, sedation score and side effects had been insignificantly varied between the studied groups. Visual analogous scale (VAS) at rest and cough was significantly lower in meperidine group than tramadol group at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 hours (P<0.05). VAS at rest and cough was significantly lower in meperidine group than bupivacaine group at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 hours (P≤0.001).
Conclusions: The impact of the addition of intraincisional Meperidine or tramadol to bupivacaine caused adequate and prolonged analgesia. Meperidine when added to intraincisional bupivacaine provides significant analgesia better than intraincisional bupivacaine alone as lasting for a relatively long time.
References
2. Shoar S, Esmaeili S, Safari S. Pain management after surgery: A brief review. Anesth Pain Med. 2012; 1:184-6.
3. Fong A, Schug SA. Pathophysiology of pain: a practical primer.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134:8-14.
4. Paul AK, Smith CM, Rahmatullah M, Nissapatorn V, Wilairatana P, Spetea M, et al. Opioid analgesia and opioid-induced adverse effects: a review. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14:10-91.
5. Miguez G, Laborda MA, Miller RR. Classical conditioning and pain: conditioned analgesia and hyperalgesia. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014; 145:10-20.
6. Lavoie A, Toledo P. Multimodal postcesarean delivery analgesia. Clin Perinatol. 2013;40:443-55.
7. Stoops WW, Lofwall MR, Nuzzo PA, Craig LB, Siegel AJ, Walsh SL. Pharmacodynamic profile of tramadol in humans: influence of naltrexone pretreatment. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012;223:427-38.
8. Kendall LV, Oliver VL, Adamson TW. Pharmacology of Analgesics. Anesth Analg Lab Anim. 2013; 9:139-85.
9. Baldo BA, Pham NH, Baldo BA, Pham NH. Opioid Analgesic Drugs.J Clin Anesth.2021;12:411-38.
10. Jabalameli M, Safavi M, Honarmand A, Saryazdi H, Moradi D, Kashefi P. The comparison of intraincisional injection tramadol, pethidine and bupivacaine on postcesarean section pain relief under spinal anesthesia. Adv Biomed Res. 2012; 1:53.
11. Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, Ullrich FA. Obstetric Anaesthesia Workforce survey. Twenty year update. Anaesthesiology. 2005; 103:645-53.
12. Lonnqvist PA, Morton NS. Postoperative analgesia in infants and children. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95:59-68.
13. Armstrong PJ, Morton CP, Nimmo AF. Pethidine has a local anaesthetic action on peripheral nerves in vivo. Addition to prilocaine 0.25% for intravenous regional anaesthesia in volunteers. Anaesthesia.1993; 48: 382-6.
14. Acalovschi I, Cristea T, Margarit S, Gavrus R. Tramadol added to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:209-14.
15. Onutu A, Iacob IM, Todor A, Lucaciu D, Acalovschi I. Wound infiltration with 1% pethidine provides an opioid-sparing effect after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study. Rom J Anesth Int Care. 2012;19:5-12.
16. Khajavi MR, Mojaver Aghili SB, Moharari RS, Najafi A, Mohtaram R, Khashayar P, et al. Subcutaneous tramadol infiltration at the wound site versus intravenous administration after pyelolithotomy. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:430-5.
17. Zohar E, Shapiro A, Eidinov A, Fishman A, Fredman B. Postcesarean analgesia: the efficacy of bupivacaine wound instillation with and without supplemental diclofenac. J Clin Anesth. 2006; 18:415-21.
18. Trotter T, Hayes‐Gregson P, Robinson S, Cole L, Coley S, Fell D. Wound infiltration of local anaesthetic after lower segment caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1991; 46:404-7.
19. Jabalameli M, Hazegh P, Talakoub R. Preemptive subcutaneous tramadol for post- operative pain in lower abdomen surgeries: A randomized double blinded placebo-control study. Adv Biomed Res. 2013;20:68-5.
20. Marzida M. A randomized controlled study comparing subcutaneous pethidine with oral diclofenac forpain relief after caesarean section. JUMMEC. 2009;12:63-9.
21. Altunkaya H, Ozer Y, Kargi E, Babuccu O. Comparison of local anaesthetic effects of tramadol with prilocaine for minor surgical procedures.Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:320-2.