DIAGNOSTIC UTILITY OF IMPRINT CYTOLOGY FOR ASSESSMENT OF BREAST LUMPS.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Artifact, Benign, Cryostat, Ductal carcinoma, Malignant
Abstract
The most common malignant tumour among women is breast carcinoma. Early lesions of the breast including carcinoma are potentially curable if treated properly in the era of breast conservative therapy. For this purpose different diagnostic strategies are in practice. Intra operative Imprint Cytology (IC) and Frozen Section (FS) have a role in spite of the intense recognition of aspiration cytology in the following settings: inconclusive cytological/core biopsy findings; for evaluation of lumpectomy margins and intra operative nodal status. Both IC and FS are dependable intra operative diagnostic consultation modalities and provide accurate results in minutes thereby making appropriate therapeutic decision.
Aim
To study the IC and FS features of breast lesions with correlation of final Histopathologic (HP) diagnosis and to determine its diagnostic accuracy.
Materials and Methods
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Pathology over a period of two years (October 2022-September 2024). A total of 62 cases of surgically resected breast specimens were evaluated for features of IC, FS and correlation with HP diagnosis. After describing gross features, representative tissue fragment was taken, three imprint smears were made and same tissue fragment was subjected to FS and later for routine HP processing. Slides prepared by IC, FS were interpreted and later correlated with HP diagnosis. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS for windows (version 16.0) by applying appropriate tests.
Results
Out of 62 cases, 33(53.23%) were malignant and 29(46.77%) were benign. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of IC were 100%, 96.43% and 98.36% and for FS were 100%, 96.55% and 98.39% respectively. p-value for both were <0.001 indicating significant correlation with HP study.
Conclusion
IC is a simple, accurate, rapid and cost effective diagnostic tool intra operatively where services for FS are not available. It preserves crisp cellular and nuclear detail. FS tissue architecture strongly approximates permanent HP sections but is frequently hampered by freezing artifact. But FS is able to differentiate carcinoma in situ and infiltrative lesions from benign breast lesions. Thus, IC and FS together offer a more reliable diagnosis; hence, it is always useful to prepare both the slides intra operatively. HP study still remains the gold standard in final diagnosis of any breast lesion. In surgical pathology, the correlation of intra operative IC and FS diagnosis with the final HP diagnosis form an essential part of quality assurance activity.
References
2. Akhtar ZM, Qureshi SA, Aziz N, Niazi S, Qureshi SS, Bukhari MH. Evaluation of accuracy of intra operative imprint cytology for detection of breast lesions. Annals of KEMU. 2010;16(1):48–54. [Google Scholar]
3. Laucirica R. Intraoperative assessment of the breast: Guidelines and potential pitfalls. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129(12):1565–74. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-1565IAOTBG. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Coffin CM, Spilker K, Zhou H, Lowichik A, Pysher TJ. Frozen section diagnosis in pediatric surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:1619–25. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-1619-FSDIPS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Khalid A, Ul Haque A. Touch impression cytology versus frozen section as intraoperative consultation diagnosis. Int J Pathol. 2004;2(2):63–70. [Google Scholar]
6. Raab SS, Tworek JA, Souers R, Zarbo RJ. The value of monitoring frozen section permanent section correlation data over time. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130:337–42. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-337-TVOMFS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Karve PV, Jambhekar NA, Desai SS, Chinoy RF. Role of frozen section evaluation in patients with breast lumps: A study of 251 cases. Indian Journal of Surgery. 2005;67(5):248–52. [Google Scholar]
8. Tarek MN, Shabaan HA, Abodeif WT, EL-Bolkainy MN, EL-Tony A. Intra operative diagnosis of breast mass lesions: Comparison of the validity of touch smear preparation and frozen section techniques. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute. 2008;20(1):63–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Layfield LJ, Mooney E. Specimen adequacy in FNAB of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;109(4):494–95. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/109.4.494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Ramraje SN, Bharambe BM, Tote VD. Imprint smear cytology and histopathology of breast lesions – A comparative evaluation with review of literature. Cibtech Journal of Bio-Protocols. 2012;1(2):22–27. [Google Scholar]
11. Haeri H, Djamali M, Ahmadinejad M. Comparision of the cytology technique and the frozen section results in intra-operative consultation of the breast lesions. Acta Medica Iranica. 2002;40(3):203–06. [Google Scholar]
12. Stanley MW, Sidawy MK, Sanchez MA, Stahl RE, Goldfischer M. Current issues in breast cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113(1):49–75. doi: 10.1309/29FP-0QAU-CMJY-BK3U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Khudier HH, Hawramy AA, Abdul-Qadir GM. Role of imprint cytology in breast lesions. Iraqi journal of medical sciences. 2009;7(4):61–66. [Google Scholar]
14. Hiregoudar AD, Godhi AS, Malur PR, Gogeri BV, Metgud S. Accuracy of intraoperative imprint smears in breast tumours: A study of 40 cases with review of literature. Indian Journal Of Surgery. 2006;68(6):302–05. [Google Scholar]
15. Orrel SR, Sterrett GF, Whitaker D. In: Fine needle aspiration cytology. 5th ed. India: Elsevier; 2012. Breast; pp. 156–209. [Google Scholar]
16. Peters SR. In: A practical guide to frozen section technique. New York: Springer; 2010. Microscopic interpretation in the frozen section setting; pp. 131–149. [Google Scholar]
17. Bianchi S, Palli D, Ciatto S, Galli M, Giorgi D, Vezzosi V, et al. Accuracy and reliability of frozen section diagnosis in a series of 672 nonpalpable breast lesions. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;103:199–205. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/103.2.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Yun NIU, Xi-lin FU, Yong YU, Wang PP, Xu-chen CAO. Intra-operative frozen section diagnosis of breast lesions: A retrospective analysis of 13,243 Chinese patients. Chinese Medical Journal. 2007;120(8):630–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Sheikh SA, Singha PP, Ganguly S, Angela Phukan A, Das SS, Jahnabi Das J. Frozen section of breast lesions, its correlation with fnac and histopathology: a tertiary centre experience. Journal of Science. 2016;6(3):191–201. [Google Scholar]
20. Carter D, Schnitt SJ, Mills SE. In: Sternberg’s Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2015. The Breast; pp. 317–77. [Google Scholar]
21. Ferreiro GA, Gisvold JJ, Bostwick DG. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of mammographically directed breast biopsies- result of 1490 consecutive cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19:1267–71. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199511000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Sultana N, Kayani N. Validity of Frozen Section in the diagnosis of breast lumps: 5 years experience at the Aga Khan University Hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2005;55(12):533–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Fadwa JA. Audit of breast frozen sections. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2004;24:141–44. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2004.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Chang A, Bassett L, Bose S. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: A cytologic dilemma. Report of a case and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;26:191–96. doi: 10.1002/dc.10073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dr Manish Kumar Singh
Associate professor, Department of pathology, Venkateswara institute of medical sciences
Dr sanjay kumar yadav
Assistant Professor, Department of pathology, Venkateswara institute of medical sciences
Dr shivam bhardwaj
Assistant Professor , Department of Radiology , Rajshree medical research institute and hospital , Bareilly
Dr Md. Sakib Anwer
Assistant Professor, Department of pathology, Venkateswara institute of medical sciences