SHOCK INDEX AS A PREDICTOR OF OUTCOME IN SEPSIS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Critical Care, Infectious Diseases, Mortality, Ventilator Support, Inotropic Support, Shock Index, Sepsis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sepsis screening tools are designed to promote early identification of sepsis. There is wide variation in diagnostic accuracy of these tools in predicting outcome. Clinical tools used for sepsis screening are SIRS criteria, vital signs, qSOFA, SOFA, NEWS and MEWS score. Most of these rely on laboratory information to define treatment strategies causing delays in care. The shock index is a bedside assessment defined as heart rate divided by SBP. Early phase of sepsis demonstrates physiological compensatory mechanism, keeping blood pressure from falling despite presence of decreased circulating blood volume by increasing heart rate. In such events, Shock Index (SI) is useful as an early warning.
AIM OF THE STUDY: To study the disease spectrum of patients with suspected sepsis and assess the usefulness of Shock Index (SI) in predicting the clinical outcome.
METHODS: 75 patients diagnosed with sepsis according to q SOFA Score were included for the study. Vital signs of study participants at the time of admission were used for calculating the SI and qSOFA scores. Blood investigations such as complete blood counts, lactate, creatinine, bilirubin levels, serum electrolytes and ABG analysis were used for calculating the initial SOFA score. Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) comparing SI, SOFA, qSOFA and lactate levels in terms of outcomes such as mortality, inotropic support requirement, ventilatory support and duration of hospital stay of patients was obtained.
RESULTS : Our study showed Shock index is a good predictor of mortality in Sepsis patients after SOFA score. We also found that Shock Index is a better predictor of need for inotropic support in Sepsis patients and is the second best predictor of need for ventilatory support after SOFA score in Sepsis.
CONCLUSION: The urinary tract and lungs are major sites of Sepsis. Shock Index performed as a good indicator of In-Hospital mortality, and its performance was comparable to other established indices like qSOFA score, SOFA score and Lactate levels. Shock index ≥1 was associated with greater rates of inotropic and ventilatory support requirement and longer duration of hospital stay.
CATEGORIES: Emergency Medicine, Internal Medicine, Infectious Disease.
References
2. World Health Organization. Global report on the epidemiology and burden of sepsis: current evidence, identifying gaps and future directions.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010.
3. Jeganathan N. Burden of Sepsis in India. Chest 2022;1:1438-9.
4. Divatia JV, Amin PR, Ramakrishnan N, et al. Intensive care in India: The Indian intensive care case mix and practice patterns study. Indian journal of critical care medicine: peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine 2016;20:216.
5. Todi S, Chatterjee S, Bhattacharyya M. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in India. Crit Care 2007;11(Suppl 2):P65.
6. Awareness about sepsis in India quite low: study: PTI feed, News - India Today http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/awareness-about-sepsis-in-india-quite-lowstudy/1/768416.html.
7. Todi S, Chatterjee S, Sahu S, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in India: an update. Crit Care 2010;14(Suppl 1):P382.
8. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. New Engl J Med 2001;8:1368-77.
9. Shapiro NI, Howell MD, Talmor D, et al. Serum lactate as a Predictor of mortality in emergency department patients with infection. Ann Emerg Med 2005;45:524-8.
10. Netea MG, van der Meer JW: Immunodeficiency and genetic defects of pattern-recognition receptors . New England Journal of Medicine 2011;6:60-70.
11. de Grooth HJ, Geenen IL, Girbes AR, et al. SOFA and mortality endpoints in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Critical Care 2017;21:1-9.
12. Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Medicine 2018;44:925-8.
13. Rousseaux J, Grandbastien B, Dorkenoo A, et al. Prognostic value of shock index in children with septic shock. Pediatric Emergency Care 2013;29:1055-9.
14. Anand A, Kumar N, Gambhir I. Clinicomicrobiological profile of the Indian elderly with sepsis. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 2016;9(5):316-20.
15. Berger T, Green J, Horeczko T, et al. Shock index and early recognition of sepsis in the emergency department: pilot study. West J Emerg Med 2013;14(2):168.
16. Rady MY, Nightingale P, Little RA, et al Shock index: a re-evaluation in acute circulatory failure . Resuscitation 1992;23(3):227-34.
17. Chatterjee S, Bhattacharya M, Todi SK. Epidemiology of adult-population sepsis in India: a single center 5 year experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2017;21(9):573-7.
18. Prashanth VN, Sneha. Shock index as a predictor of vasopressor use in patients with sepsis. International Journal of Advances in Medicine 2019;6(5):1488–92.
19. Lie KC, Lau CY, Van Vinh Chau N, et al. Utility of SOFA score, management and outcomes of sepsis in Southeast Asia: a multinational multicenter prospective observational study. Journal of Intensive Care 2018;6:9.
20. Asaari H. Value of shock index in prognosticating the short term outcome of death for patients presenting with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department. Med J Malaysia 2012;67(4):406-11.