COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TOPICAL 1% IVERMECTIN AND 5% PERMETHRIN CREAMS IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH UNCOMPLICATED SCABIES: A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Scabies, sarcoptes scabiei, pediatric dermatology, permethrin, ivermectin
Abstract
Introduction: Scabies is a highly contagious skin condition caused by Sarcoptes scabiei var. hominis. Pediatric patients are particularly vulnerable due to close interpersonal interactions, necessitating effective and well-tolerated treatment options. Although topical 5% Permethrin is widely used, topical 1% Ivermectin cream is emerging as an alternative with potential advantages in efficacy and tolerability.
Methods and Material: A prospective, comparative clinical trial was conducted on 140 pediatric patients of age group 5 to 18 years diagnosed with uncomplicated scabies in a tertiary care hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either topical 1% Ivermectin or topical 5% Permethrin cream, applied once at night and repeated after seven days.
Treatment efficacy was assessed at weeks 1, 2, and 4 based on pruritus severity (VAS scale), lesion count, treatment response, and adverse effects. Chi-square tests, t-tests, and Fischer's exact test were used to compare treatment outcomes.
Results: By week 4, the Ivermectin group demonstrated significantly superior improvement in pruritus severity (VAS score: 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 2.8 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) and lesion count reduction. A significantly higher percentage of patients in the Ivermectin group achieved a good response (>75% improvement) compared to the Permethrin group (45.71% vs. 24.28%, p = 0.049). Adverse effects were less frequent in the Ivermectin group (17.1%) compared to the Permethrin group (41.4%).
Conclusions: Topical 1% Ivermectin cream demonstrated greater efficacy, faster symptom relief, and a better safety profile compared to 5% Permethrin in pediatric scabies. These findings suggest that Ivermectin may be a preferred first-line treatment, especially in children. Future studies with larger cohorts are essential to confirm these results and assess resistance patterns.
References
2. Chhaiya S, Patel V, Dave J, Mehta D, Shah H: Comparative efficacy and safety of topical permethrin, topical ivermectin, and oral ivermectin in patients of uncomplicated scabies. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2012, 78:605-10. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.100571.
3. Mallya RR, Swaroop R, Reddy KY, et al.: Study of efficacy and cost effectiveness of topical permethrin, benzyl benzoate and oral ivermectin in the treatment of scabies.. IP Indian J Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021, 7:54-60. doi: 10.18231/j.ijced.2021.010
4. Verma S, Ahsan M: Comparison of topical ivermectin and oral ivermectin in the treatment of human scabies: A randomized controlled trial. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2020, 11:134-9. doi: 10.4103/jpp.JPP_116_20
5. Yashdeep SK, Deepika P, Kataria U: Comparative study of ivermectin and permethrin 5% in treatment of scabies patients. MedPulse Int J Med.2017. 3:18-21. doi: 10.26611/1021315
6. Verma A, Agarwal S, Bishnoi S, et al.: A comparative study of Topical Ivermectin cream versus topical permethrin with oral ivermectin in scabies. IOSR J DentMed Sci. 2019, 18:42-43.
7. Manjhi PK, Sinha RI, Kumar M, et al.: Comparative study of efficacy of oral ivermectin versus some topical antiscabies drugs in the treatment of scabies. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014, 8:01-04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9092.4878
8. Mohammad Jahid Hasan, Md Adur Rafi, Taha Choudhury, Md Golam Hossain: Prevalence and risk factors of scabies among children living in Madrasahs (Islamic religious boarding schools) of Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Paediatrics Open. 2024, 8:e002421. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002421
9. Romani L, Koroivueta J, Steer AC, et al.: Scabies and impetigo prevalence and risk factors in Fiji: a national survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015, 9:0003452. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0753
10. Heukelbach J, Wilcke T, Winter B, Feldmeier H: Epidemiology and morbidity of scabies and pediculosis capitis in resource-poor communities in Brazil. Br J Dermatol. 2005, 153:150-156. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06591.x
11. Feldmeier H, Jackson A, Ariza L, et al.: The epidemiology of scabies in an impoverished community in rural Brazil: presence and severity of disease are associated with poor living conditions and illiteracy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009, 60:436-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.005
12. Barot J, Solanki A, Patel N, et al.: A retrospective study of the pattern of sexually transmitted diseases in teenagers attending sexually transmitted disease clinic during a 7-year period at a tertiary care centre. Indian J Paed Dermatol. 2018, 19:220-223. doi: 10.4103/ijpd.IJPD_100_17
13. Goldust M, Rezaee E, Raghifar R, Hemayat S: Treatment of scabies: the topical ivermectin vs. permethrin 2.5% cream. Ann. Parasitol. 2013, 59:79-84.
14. Usman A, Shehzad A, Shahid M, Saleem Z, Khawaja A: Abeer Comparison between efficacy of topical 1% ivermectin and topical 5% permethrin in the treatment of scabies. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2021, 31:633-6.
15. Saeed A, Tariq S, Iqbal M, et al.: Study comparing topical ivermectin versus topical permethrin in the treatment of scabies. Cureus. 2023, 15:48746. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48746