Study of Relationship between Fingerprint Patterns and Gender among the Assamese Population of Barpeta

Main Article Content

Jayasri Devi, Santanu Kumar Sarma, Tribeni Medhi, Priyankita Nath

Keywords

Loop, Whorl, Arches, Assamese, Gender

Abstract

Universally accepted tool for identification of an individual is fingerprint. Scientific analysis  of  fingerprints, lines, mounts and shape of the hands called ‘dermatoglyphics’. There are three primary patterns of fingerprint viz., loops, whorls and arches which are unique in each individual and extensively used in forensic medicine as well as in biometrics. Fingerprints are affected by multiple factors including hereditary, environmental and regional.

Abstract 36 | PDF Downloads 12

References

1. Bhabna D, Ruchi J, Prakash T, Kalyan J L, Study of fingerprint in relationship with blood group and gender. Statistical review. Res J Forensic Sci. 2013;1:15-7.
2. Cummins, Harold; Midlo, Charles 1929. Finger prints, palms, and soles : an introduction to dermatoglyphics. South Berlin, Mass.: Research Pub. Co. ISBN 0486207781. OCLC 2816894.

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published
Apr 12, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/1mfxjx55

Article Details

How to Cite
Jayasri Devi, Santanu Kumar Sarma, Tribeni Medhi, Priyankita Nath. (2025). Study of Relationship between Fingerprint Patterns and Gender among the Assamese Population of Barpeta. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 32(3), 336-345. https://doi.org/10.53555/1mfxjx55
Issue
Vol. 32 No. 3 (2025): JPTCP
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All articles published in JPTCP  are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Jayasri Devi, Santanu Kumar Sarma, Tribeni Medhi, Priyankita Nath. (2025). Study of Relationship between Fingerprint Patterns and Gender among the Assamese Population of Barpeta. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 32(3), 336-345. https://doi.org/10.53555/1mfxjx55