BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL EDUCATION INTEGRATION IN MEDICAL CURRICULA: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW

Main Article Content

Dr. Sumaiya Irfan
Dr. Christaneisha Soleyn
Dr. Jilani A. Q.
Dr. Sudarsana Gogoi
Dr. Syed Tahseen Raza
Dr. Sharique Ahmad

Keywords

Biopsychosocial, Medical education, Medical curricula, Interdisciplinary Teaching

Abstract

The biopsychosocial model represents a holistic approach to healthcare, acknowledging the complex dynamics between biological, psychological, and social factors. Despite its broad theoretical acceptance, its integration into medical education has been inconsistent and fragmented. This comprehensive review explores the status of biopsychosocial education within medical curricula, delves into the challenges impeding its integration, highlights the benefits of a more holistic educational approach, and provides evidence-based recommendations for embedding this model more effectively into medical training. Through an extensive review of over 20 studies, this paper offers practical recommendations for more effective integration of biopsychosocial education into medical curricula. Recommendations include curricular reform to embed biopsychosocial principles throughout all stages of training, interdisciplinary teaching approaches to broaden students' perspectives, and innovative assessment methods to evaluate students' understanding and application of the model. Additionally, the review emphasizes the need for faculty development programs is crucial for equipping educators with the skills necessary to teach biopsychosocial concepts proficiently.


By addressing these challenges and implementing the proposed recommendations, medical schools can better prepare future physicians to deliver holistic, patient-centered care. This review italicizes the importance of compendious proposition in medical education that aligns with the changing needs of modern healthcare. Future research directions are suggested to further explore the impact of biopsychosocial education on patient outcomes and physician development, contributing to ongoing efforts to reform medical training and improve healthcare delivery.

Abstract 51 | pdf Downloads 15

References

1. Borrell-Carrió F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):576-82.
2. Benning TB. The biomedical model of mental disorder: A critical analysis of its validity, utility, and effects on psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry Residents J. 2015;10(12):27-9.
3. Bleakley A, Bligh J, Browne J. Medical Education for the Future: Identity, Power and Location. Springer; 2011.
4. Branch WT. The road to professionalism: reflective practice and reflective learning. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;71(2):204-5.
5. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287(2):226-35.
6. Frankel RM, Quill TE, McDaniel SH, editors. The biopsychosocial approach: Past, present, future. Univ Rochester Press; 2003.
7. Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):581-624.
8. Glasgow RE, Fisher L, Skaff M, Mullan J, Toobert DJ. Problem-solving and diabetes self-management: investigation in a large, multiracial sample. Diabetes Care. 2001;25(7):1152-7.
9. Harden RM, Lilley P, Patricio M. The Definitive Guide to the OSCE: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination as a Performance Assessment. Elsevier; 2015.
10. Hill MR, Goicochea S, Merlo LJ. In their own words: Stressors facing medical students in the millennial generation. Med Educ Online. 2016;23(1):1530558.
11. Hudson CC, Fortin PL, Pellerin MA. A needs-based assessment of biopsychosocial education in Canadian medical schools. Med Educ. 2020;54(2):161-70.
12. Nestel D, Groom J, Eikeland-Husebø S, O'Donnell JM. Simulation for learning and teaching procedural skills: the state of the science. Simul Healthc. 2014;6(2):139-46.
13. Petersen CE, Gordon JA, Harward DH. The use of standardized patients in surgical education. Surgery. 2008;144(5):643-8.
14. Rao D, Dixon P, Taylor J. Faculty development in teaching the biopsychosocial model to medical students. Med Teach. 2020;42(12):1369-75.
15. Ross CA, Hinton L. What to do when you don’t believe in what your patient believes in: Cultural humility, empathy, and curiosity. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(6):E511-6.
16. Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors Talking with Patients/Patients Talking with Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits. Praeger Publishers; 2006.
17. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28(6):497-526.
18. Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, Kidd JM, MacDougall C, Matthews P, Clay D. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e421-44.
19. von der Lippe E, Diepgen TL. Attitudes towards psychosocial training in European medical schools: A cross-sectional survey. Eur J Public Health. 2018;28(4):648-54.
20. World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030. WHO Press; 2019.
21. Wright SM, Carrese JA. Excellence in role modelling: insight and perspectives from the pros. CMAJ. 2002;167(6):638-43.
22. Yardley S, Brosnan C, Richardson J, Hays R. Authentic early experience in medical education: a socio-cultural analysis identifying important characteristics. Med Educ. 2013;47(9):869-80.
23. Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1516-28.
24. Levinson W, Roter DL. Physicians' psychosocial beliefs correlate with their patient communication skills. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(7):375-9.
25. Borrell-Carrió F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM. The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later: Principles, Practice, and Scientific Inquiry. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):576-82.
26. Turabian JL. Patient-centered care and biopsychosocial model. J Community Med Health Educ. 2019;9(1):639.
27. Dunlop M, Exner-Cortens D, Epp B. Integrating the Biopsychosocial Model into Undergraduate Medical Education: A Narrative Review. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1586268.
28. Parmelee DX, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, Hudes PD. Team-Based Learning: A Practical Guide: AMEE Guide No. 65. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e275-87.
29. O'Neill B, Holmqvist M, Grainger R. Interdisciplinary learning in medical education: A review of the literature. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2018;5:2382120518760319.
30. Katz D, Greenfield S, Strunk C, et al. Collaborative teaching: An innovative strategy for promoting interdisciplinary education in medical schools. Med Educ. 2006;40(10):1005-12.
31. Nestel D, Jolly B. Advances in patient simulation for medical education. Acad Med. 2005;80(6):610-6.
32. Wood DF. Problem-based learning. BMJ. 2003;326(7384):328-30.
33. Steinert Y, Naismith L, Mann K. Faculty development: From workshops to communities of practice. Med Teach. 2012;34(7):510-7.
34. Arnold L. Approaches to developing the teaching role of the clinician. Med Educ. 2005;39(9):890-5.
35. Eva KW, Cunnington JP, Regehr G, et al. Assessing clinical reasoning: A comparison of the validity of four methods. Acad Med. 2004;79(1):42-8.
36. Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, et al. Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):84-91.