AN IN VIVO ANTHROPOMETRIC STUDY ON FEMORAL AND TIBIAL MORPHOLOGY AND COMPARISON WITH THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT SYSTEMS IN INDIAN POPULATION: AN EFFECTIVE INDIGENOUS STUDY. “TRANSFORMATION FROM ACCURACY TO PRECISION IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY”

Main Article Content

Dr. Sai Kumar Reddy Mukkamalla
Dr. G. Gnanendra Reddy
Dr. M. Sasikanth Reddy
Dr. H. Umanatha Rao

Keywords

Anthropometry, Total Knee Arthroplasty, Femoral Component, Tibial component, Indian Population, Indian Knee

Abstract

Background: Total Knee Arthroplasty is very successful procedure with almost 98% of successful outcomes. The ease of surgical techniques and wide range availability of Implants made this surgery very competent and encouraging. Most of the Implants have been studied and designed in various countries. In our study we measured our Indian Knees intra operatively and assessed the anthropometry of wide popular implant systems which are used across the world(SMITH & NEPHEW, DEPUY, ZIMMER).


Materials and Methods: We studied 151 patients who underwent Total Knee Replacement in our hospital and measured intraoperatively the native anatomy measurements of femur and tibia of Indian Population and compared with the dimensions of Femoral and Tibial components of Femur and Tibia of Genesis II, SMITH & NEPHEW, DEPUY, ZIMMER implant system.


Results: There was a huge variability between the patient anatomical parameters and the actual implant kept except for femur MCAP, LCAP, Tibia ML in Depuy.


Conclusion: We conclude by saying that there is a significant mismatch of Measurements between the femur native human anatomy and components of Implant systems. Therefore there is a wide scope of generating the appropriateness of Implant designs and Dimensions according to Indian Native Human Anatomy in the field of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Abstract 58 | pdf Downloads 24

References

1. Vaidya SV, Ranawat CS, Aroojis A, Laud NS. Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15:79-85x.
2. Cheng CK, Lung CY, Lee YM, Huang CH. A new approach of designing the tibial base plate of total knee prosthese. Clin Biomech. 1999; 14:112-7.
3. Insall JN. Surgical techniques and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, editors. Surgery of the Knee. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 1993, 739.
4. 5. Incavo SJ, Ronchetti PJ, Howe JG, Tranowski JP. Tibia1 plateau coverage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994; 299:81-5.
5. Shah DS, Ghyar R, Ravi B, Shetty V. 3D morphological Study of the Indian Arthritic Knee: Comparison with Other Ethnic Groups and Conformity of Current TKA Implant. Open Journal of Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases. 2013; 3:263-269.
6. Darshan Shah S, Rupesh Ghyar, Bhallamudi Ravi, Chintan Hegde, Vijay Shetty. Morphological Measurements of Knee Joints in Indian Population: Comparison to Current Knee Prostheses: Open Journal of Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases, 2014; 4:75-85.
7. Rahul Ramesh Kumar Agrawal, Tushar Ranjan Dalei and AV Gurava Reddy. Computer tomography 3D reconstruction based study of knee anthropometry of Indian population: Comparison with other ethnic groups and current TKA implants.International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences 2017; 3(4): 242-249