TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY OF THE OSTAP BLOCK WITH ROPIVACAINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
Main Article Content
Keywords
OSTAP block, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, postoperative pain, ropivacaine, ultrasound-guided block, opioid consumption.
Abstract
Background:
Postoperative pain management remains a critical challenge in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, particularly in procedures involving the anterior abdominal wall. The ultrasound-guided Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane (OSTAP) block has emerged as a promising technique for improving postoperative analgesia.
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of the OSTAP block with ropivacaine in reducing postoperative pain, prolonging analgesia duration, and minimizing opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods: This observational study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Government Medical College and Associated Hospitals, Srinagar (J&K). A total of 70 patients aged 28 to 70 years, classified as ASA I-II, undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia, were divided into two groups. Group A received an ultrasound-guided OSTAP block with 0.2% ropivacaine, while Group B did not receive the block. Pain scores (VAS), time to first analgesia request, total opioid consumption, and side effects were recorded and compared between the groups.
Results: Group A demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores at all intervals (0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours) compared to Group B (2.3 vs. 4.7; p=0.001). The duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in Group A (7.25±1.20 hours vs. 4.05±0.80 hours; p=0.003). Total opioid consumption was reduced in Group A (80±30.2 mg vs. 170±70.5 mg; p<0.05). No side effects or complications were observed in either group.
Conclusion: The OSTAP block with ropivacaine is a cost-effective, safe, and effective technique for postoperative pain management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It significantly improves pain control, reduces opioid consumption, and prolongs analgesia duration without associated side effects.
References
2. Patel R., 2021. ‘Minimally invasive surgeries and postoperative pain management,’ Surgical Pain, 19(4): 302-308.
3. Kumar V., 2022. ‘Pain management strategies in laparoscopic surgeries,’ Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 58(2): 101-107.
4. Johnson L., 2023. ‘Postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy,’ Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 10(1): 115-120.
5. Lee K., 2019. ‘Opioid use in postoperative recovery: Risks and alternatives,’ Pain Management, 24(6): 450-456.
6. Rafi A., 2001. ‘Transversus abdominis plane block: A novel approach to abdominal anesthesia,’ Anaesthesia, 56(7): 816-819.
7. Ahmed S., 2018. ‘Effectiveness of TAP block in reducing opioid consumption post-abdominal surgery,’ Journal of Regional Anesthesia, 43(5): 522-527.
8. Chou Y., 2020. ‘Outcomes of TAP block in laparoscopic procedures: A systematic review,’ Surgical Anesthesia, 42(9): 753-758.
9. Hebbard P., 2008. ‘The oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block: A study in the efficacy of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for abdominal surgeries,’ Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 33(6): 575-580.
10. Marhofer P., 2010. ‘Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in abdominal procedures,’ Anesthesia & Analgesia, 110(1): 108-112.
11. Turner B., 2016. ‘Ultrasound-guided TAP block for gastric and bariatric surgeries: A review of the literature,’ Obesity Surgery, 26(3): 407-411.
12. Raj P., 2017. ‘The role of ultrasound-guided TAP block in hepatobiliary and renal surgeries,’ Journal of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, 23(7): 1420-1425.
13. Singh S., 2019. ‘The efficacy of OSTAP block in laparoscopic surgeries,’ Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 30(5): 574-579.
14. Shah A., 2020. ‘Postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparison of TAP block with other methods,’ Pain Medicine, 35(4): 421-428.
15. Morris P., 2022. ‘Ultrasound-guided OSTAP block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review,’ Journal of Regional Anesthesia, 50(2): 139-144.
16. Niraj G., Searle A., Mathews M., 2009. “Comparative evaluation of TAP block in abdominal surgeries,” Journal of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 34(2): 190-195.
17. Champaneria R., 2015. “Efficacy of TAP blocks in abdominal surgeries: A meta-analysis,” Surgical Pain Management, 45(4): 310-317.
18. Mishriky B.M., 2012. “TAP block for cesarean delivery: A systematic review,” Obstetric Anesthesia Journal, 33(3): 150-158.
19. White R., 2020. “Multimodal analgesia and TAP blocks in laparoscopic surgery,” Journal of Anesthesia Advances, 40(1): 75-82.
20. Rafi A., 2001. “Transversus abdominis plane block: A new technique for pain relief,” Journal of Pain Practice, 25(3): 123-126.
21. Hebbard P., 2007. “Ultrasound-guided TAP block: Technique and application,” Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 32(6): 510-515.
22. Mishriky B.M., 2012. “Improved analgesia with TAP blocks in cesarean sections,” Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 30(4): 170-178.
23. Champaneria R., 2015. “TAP blocks in gynecological surgeries: Short-term benefits,” Gynecologic Pain Journal, 20(2): 80-88.
24. Jones L., 2019. “Safety profile of ultrasound-guided TAP blocks,” Anesthesia and Critical Care, 28(3): 212-220.