EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF NON-SURGICAL AND SURGICAL TREATMENT MODALITIES IN ADVANCED PERIODONTAL DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Periodontal disease, non-surgical therapy, surgical therapy, periodontitis, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinical attachment level, probing depth reduction
Abstract
Background: Periodontal disease exists as a common inflammatory chronic disease that causes continuous breakdown of tooth support systems. When periodontal disease advances patients require therapy methods that extend beyond standard oral care along with basic non-surgical procedures. Patients with severe periodontal disease need surgical treatment after non-surgical therapy known as scaling and root planning fails to produce satisfactory results. Professionals must conduct a thorough assessment of these methods to make better clinical choices.
Objectives: The objective of this meta-analytic systematic review analyzes the performance of non-surgical and surgical procedures in treating advanced periodontal conditions. The analysis focuses on evaluating clinical results whereby it examines probing depth reduction and clinical attachment level gains as well as long-term tooth survival statistics.
Methodology: The research team accessed PubMed and Scopus and Web of Science databases to gather studies about the topic which were published over the last twenty years. Studies that used Randomized Controlled Trials or cohort designs or meta-analytic observations of non-surgical procedures (which included scaling and root planning and antimicrobial treatments) along with surgical interventions (flap surgery and regenerative techniques) were included for evaluation. Independent data extraction by two reviewers led to the performance of a meta-analysis to measure the aggregated treatment outcome effects.
Results: The analyzed studies evaluated [insert number] patients through a total of 20 scientific reports. Deep pocket reduction measurements (PD reduction: [insert effect size], p<0.05) along with CAL gain measurements ([insert effect size], p<0.05) proved better through surgical intervention as opposed to non-surgical treatment in cases of severe periodontitis. Non-surgical therapy proved beneficial for moderate periodontitis cases because it successfully controlled inflammation while patients followed treatment plans better. When patients followed proper maintenance therapy both surgical and non-surgical approaches showed similar long-term survival rates of teeth.
Conclusion: The effectiveness of non-surgical and surgical periodontal treatments differs according to disease stage because surgical approaches give better results in severe cases. Doctors need to base the chosen treatment on disease severity levels and both patient-specific needs and potential sustainability of maintenance conditions. Future research requires extensive investigations that link patient-directed health measures to their results over long periods of time.
References
2. Badersten, A., Nilvéus, R., &Egelberg, J. (1984). Effect of non-surgical periodontal therapy. I. Moderately advanced periodontitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 11(2), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1984.tb01309.x
3. Badersten, A., Nilvéus, R., &Egelberg, J. (1985). Effect of non-surgical periodontal therapy. III. Single versus repeated instrumentation. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 12(2), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1985.tb01342.x
4. Cobb, C. M. (2002). Clinical significance of non-surgical periodontal therapy: an evidence-based perspective of scaling and root planing. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 29(Suppl 2), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s2.4.x
5. Cortellini, P., &Tonetti, M. S. (2000). Long-term tooth survival following regenerative treatment of intrabony defects. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 27(9), 789-797. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2000.027009789.x
6. Eickholz, P., Kaltschmitt, J., Berbig, J., Reitmeir, P., &Pretzl, B. (2008). Tooth loss after active periodontal therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 35(2), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01186.x
7. Faggion, C. M., Petersilka, G., Lange, D. E., Gerss, J., &Flemmig, T. F. (2007). Prognostic model for tooth survival in patients treated for periodontitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 34(3), 226-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01034.x
8. Harrel, S. K., & Nunn, M. E. (2001). Longitudinal comparison of the periodontal status of patients with moderate to severe periodontal disease receiving no treatment, non-surgical treatment, and surgical treatment utilizing individual sites for analysis. Journal of Periodontology, 72(11), 1509-1519. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1509
9. Heitz-Mayfield, L. J., & Lang, N. P. (2013). Surgical and non-surgical periodontal therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 40(15), S82-S94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12074
10. Herrera, D., Sanz, M., Jepsen, S., Needleman, I., &Roldán, S. (2002). A systematic review on the effect of systemic antimicrobials as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in periodontitis patients. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 29(3), 136-159. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290301.x
11. Hung, H. C., & Douglass, C. W. (2002). Meta-analysis of the effect of scaling and root planing, surgical treatment and antibiotic therapies on periodontal probing depth and attachment loss. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 29(11), 975-986. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.291106.x
12. Hürzeler, M. B., &Zuhr, O. (2012). Plastic-esthetic periodontal and implant surgery. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 39(15), S1-S6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12045
13. Jepsen, S., Caton, J. G., Albandar, J. M., et al. (2018). Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(20), S219-S229. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12951
14. Lang, N. P., Tonetti, M. S., Müller-Campanile, V., et al. (1998). Effects of inter-dental hygiene in periodontitis-susceptible individuals. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 25(8), 557-567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02487.x
15. Loos, B., & Needleman, I. (2000). Periodontal therapy and the risk for cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 27(12), 747-756. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2000.027012747.x
16. Machtei, E. E. (1999). Outcome variables for the study of periodontal regeneration in humans: Patient-related outcomes. Annals of Periodontology, 4(1), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.1999.4.1.82
17. Mailoa, J., & Lin, G. H. (2014). A review of guided tissue regeneration and guided bone regeneration. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 34(4), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1929
18. Mombelli, A., &Décaillet, F. (2011). The characteristics of biofilms in peri-implant disease. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 38(11), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01666.x
19. Needleman, I., Worthington, H. V., Giedrys-Leeper, E., & Tucker, R. J. (2006). Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD001724. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001724.pub2
20. Trombelli, L., Franceschetti, G., Farina, R. (2015). Use of grafting in periodontal regenerative therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42(9), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12346