OUTPATIENT TEACHER DEMONSTRATION VERSUS PEYTON’S METHOD IN ACQUISITION OF CLINICAL SKILLS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY BY PHASE III PART II MEDICAL STUDENTS
Main Article Content
Keywords
GP - Group, OPTD- outpatient teacher demonstration, PFSA- Peyton’s four-step approach.
Abstract
Background
The acquisition of clinical skills is essential in medical education, particularly in fields like otorhinolaryngology. Various teaching methods have been used to enhance skill acquisition , but the effectiveness of structured methods, such as Peyton’s Four-Step Method, compared to traditional outpatient teacher demonstration(OPTD) methods remains unclear. Peyton’s teaching approach is a stepwise teaching approach and consists of the following four steps: Demonstration, Deconstruction, Comprehension and Performance. It is more effective when small groups with few students per teacher are used. Peyton’s four-step method has several advantages over OPTD including faster learning, increased confidence and higher competency in students. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of outpatient teacher demonstration method and Peyton’s Four-Step Approach in the acquisition of clinical skills in undergraduate otolaryngology students
Methods
Total of 40 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to four groups. GP1, GP2, GP3, GP4. Six clinical skills in otorhinolaryngology were taught over six days, with one skill introduced per day. After each session, students were assessed in their performance in clinical skills,OSCE scores and confidence through Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) based on a checklist of key competencies and participants feedback and perceptions were assessed through a Likert-scale.
Results
Results showed that Peyton’s four-step approach is definitely suitable for teaching clinical examination skill. Even though retention of clinical skills was found to be equally good ,but it was superior with PFSA than with OPTD.Students who received training with Peyton’s Four-Step Method performed significantly better in the OSCE compared to students who got training with traditional out patient teacher demonstration method.Statistically significant difference was obtained proving that Peyton’s Four-Step approach as more effective tool in teaching and assessing students.Assessment of all 6 skills found to be significant with P <0.001. Both groups showed an increase in self-reported confidence, but Peyton’s group reported a higher mean increase in confidence.
Conclusion
The study demonstrates that Peyton’s Four-Step Method is more effective than the traditional OPD method in improving the clinical skill performance and confidence of undergraduate otolaryngology students. The findings suggests that more structured, interactive teaching approaches should be considered in clinical education to enhance skill acquisition
References
2. Khan MM, Saeed SR. Provision of undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching within General Medical Council approved UK medical schools: what is current practice? J Laryngol Otol. 2012;126(4):340-4. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215111003379
3. Krautter M, Weyrich P, Schultz JH, Buss SJ, Maatouk I, Junger J, et al. Effects of Peyton's four-step approach on objective performance measures in technical skill training: a controlled trial. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23(3):244-50. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2011.586917
4. Moran A, Guillot A, Macintyre T, Collet C. Re-imagining motor imagery: building bridges between cognitive neuroscience and sport psychology. Br J Psychol. 2012;103(2):224-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02068.x
5. Patil GL, Pujar TV, Seema BN, Patil SL, Nayak SR, Chigateri S. Clinical skill learning for tomorrow's doctors: a step towards better obstetric care. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(5):1832-3.
6. Benbassat J, Baumal R, Heyman SN, Brezis M. Viewpoint: suggestions for a shift in teaching clinical skills to medical students: the reflective clinical examination. Acad Med. 2005;80(12):1121-6. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200512000-00012
7. Levin M, Cennimo D, Chen S, Lamba S. Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students: a case-based illness script worksheet approach. MedEdPORTAL. 2016;12:10445. DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10445
8. Seifert LB, Schnurr B, Seu MCS, Sterz J. Comparing video-based versions of Halsted's 'see one, do one' and Peyton's 4-step approach for teaching surgical skills: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):194. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02105-5
9. Grantcharov TP, Reznick RK. Teaching procedural skills. BMJ. 2008;336(7653):1129-31. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39517.686956.47
10. Sopka S, Biermann H, Rossi AM, Knott S, Skorning M, Brokmann JC, et al. Evaluation of a newly developed media-supported 4-step approach for basic life support training. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20(1):37. DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-37
11. Duca NS, Glod S. Bridging the gap between the classroom and the clerkship: a clinical reasoning curriculum for third-year medical students. MedEdPORTAL. 2019;15:10800. DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10800
12. Herrmann-Werner A, Nikendei C, Keifenheim K, Bosse HM, Lund F, Wagner R, et al. "Best practice" skills lab training vs. a "see one, do one" approach in undergraduate medical education: a randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE. 2013
13. Gradl-Dietsch G, Lübke C, Horst K, Simon M, Modabber A, Sönmez TT, et al. Peyton's four-step approach for teaching complex spinal manipulation techniques—a prospective randomized trial. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):284. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0804-0