INFLUENCE OF FLEXIBLE RPDS ON PATIENT AESTHETICS AND COMFORT
Main Article Content
Keywords
flexible removable partial dentures, acrylic removable partial dentures, patient satisfaction, aesthetics, comfort, chewing efficiency, speech difficulty
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare the impact of flexible removable partial dentures (RPDs) and conventional acrylic RPDs on patient satisfaction, focusing on aesthetics, comfort, speech, and chewing efficiency.
Methodology: The study was conducted at Bibi Aseefa Dental College, Larkana, from January 2023 to January 2024, with a sample of 100 patients. Participants were divided into two groups: one receiving flexible RPDs and the other receiving acrylic RPDs. Data were collected through patient-reported outcomes using a Likert scale and structured interviews. Clinical examinations were also performed to assess retention quality and tissue response. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS, with chi-square and independent t-tests applied to evaluate differences between the groups.
Results: Patients with flexible RPDs reported significantly higher satisfaction with aesthetics and comfort compared to those using acrylic RPDs. Chewing efficiency was also better in the flexible RPD group, while speech difficulty was slightly higher among acrylic RPD users. Retention quality played a key role in overall satisfaction, with well-fitting dentures resulting in more favorable outcomes regardless of material type. Younger patients and those with higher education levels showed greater satisfaction with their prostheses.
Conclusion: Flexible RPDs demonstrated advantages in aesthetics, comfort, and function over acrylic RPDs. However, denture selection should be tailored to individual patient needs, considering both functional and aesthetic factors. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to validate these findings.
References
2. Ibrahim LM. Satisfaction and Complaints of Patients with Removable Partial Dentures: In Sample at Baghdad City, Iraq. Prof(Dr) RK Sharma. 2021;21(1):456.
3. Al-Jammali ZM, Al-Yasiry A, Saad Z, Al-Muthaffer A. The satisfaction of patient with respect to the aesthetic and phonetic of removable partial denture therapy for Iraqi patient. Medico-legal Update. 2021;21(1):1108-13.
4. Karasan D, Fehmer V, Ligoutsikou M, Srinivasan M, Sailer I. The Influence of Patient-Related Factors and Material Selection on the Clinical Outcomes of Fixed and Removable Complete Implant Prostheses: An Overview on Systematic Reviews. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2021;34.
5. Aljulayfi IS, Almatrafi A, Alharbi AR, Aldibas AO, AlNajei AA. The influence of replacing anterior teeth on patient acceptance of removable partial dentures in Saudi Arabia. Annals of Dental Specialty. 2022;10(2-2022):5-10.
6. Binhuraib H, Alhajrassi S, Bukhari H, Mandourah M, Mutwalli H, Hafiz W, et al. Flexible Dentures: Materials, Properties, and Patients Satisfaction. 2023.
7. Khalaf FS, waleed Abdulrazaq LR. Aesthetic criteria in removable partial dentures. 2023.
8. Muluk DS, Grover DI. Aesthetics of Claps in Removable Partial Denture-A Literature Review. International Journal of Advanced Dental Sciences and Technology. 2023;2(4):1-4.
9. Almufleh B, Arellanob A, Tamimi F. Patient‐reported outcomes and framework fit accuracy of removable partial dentures fabricated using digital techniques: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2024;33(7):626-36.
10. Dula LJ, Kelmendi TZ, Shala K, Staka G, Pustina-Krasniqi T, Kosumi S. Attachment-Retained versus Clasp-Retained Removable Partial Dentures: Effects of Retention on Patient Satisfaction. European Journal of Dentistry. 2024.
11. Ceraulo S. Aesthetics in Removable Partial Dentures: Modification of the Proximal Plate and Retentive Lamellae in Kennedy Class II Scenarios. Prosthesis. 2024;6(1):107-18.
12. Blakely L, Beare W, McColl E. Top tips for removable partial dentures: Part 1-fundamentals of success. SPRINGERNATURE CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, N1 9XW, ENGLAND; 2023.
13. YILDIRIM L. DENTISTS'PLANNING PREFERENCES FOR REMOVABLE DENTURES AND OBSERVED COMPLICATIONS IN THEIR PATIENTS: A QUESTIONNAIRE-BASED STUDY. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences. 2024;6(9):1752-71.
14. Seong LG. THE DEVELOPMENT OF FLEXIBLE DENTURE MATERIALS AND CONCEPT: A NARRATIVE REVIEW.
15. Khairunnisa SH, Yunisa F. Redesign of Removable Partial Denture to Address Gingival Recession. PROCEEDING IMPROVE QUALITY IN DENTISTRY. 2024;1(1):29-35.
16. Gray D, Barraclough O, Ali Z, Nattress B. Modern partial dentures-part 2: a review of novel metal-free materials and innovations in polymers. British Dental Journal. 2021;230(12):813-8.
17. Choong EKM, Shu X, Leung KCM, Lo ECM. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) after rehabilitation with removable partial dentures (RPDs): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry. 2022;127:104351.
18. Lim GS, Buzayan MMA, Elkezza A, Sekar K. THE DEVELOPMENT OF FLEXIBLE DENTURE MATERIALS AND CONCEPT: A NARRATIVE REVIEW: Received 2020-05-08; Accepted 2020-12-07; Published 2021-03-05. Journal of Health and Translational Medicine (JUMMEC). 2021;24(1):23-9.
19. Mahrous A, Jahangiri L, Elkassaby H. Advances in the Treatment of the Partially Edentulous Patient. Dental Clinics. 2025.
20. Vozza I, Manzon L, Passarelli PC, Pranno N, Poli O, Grippaudo C. The effects of wearing a removable-partial-denture on the bite forces: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(21):11401.