STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN CHENNAI, INDIA

Main Article Content

Mitul D. Rudach
Shanthi Vijayaraghavan

Keywords

Steatotic liver disease (SLD), MASLD, Metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease, Transient elastography (TE), Obesity, University students

Abstract

Introduction: Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is an umbrella term that represents unified terminology encompassing metabolic (MASLD, MASH), alcohol-related (MetALD, ALD) and overlapping aetiologies of steatosis, indicating the starting point of diagnosis being the feature of steatosis, regardless of aetiology. Recent advancements in understanding its pathophysiology have led to renaming of NAFLD to metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). It is classified as a subcategory of SLD. Its prevalence is increasing in India, especially among young adults due to urbanization and lifestyle changes. This study aims to assess the prevalence and risk factors of SLD among university students in Chennai.


Materials & Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among university students in Chennai, India. Data on demographics, lifestyle, and dietary habits were collected via questionnaires. Liver stiffness (LSM) and steatosis (CAP) were assessed using transient elastography. Steatosis and fibrosis were diagnosed and graded based on CAP and LSM values.


Results: The study included 250 university students with a mean age of 24.3 ± 1.98 years, 52.4% of whom were female. Among participants, 40.8% were overweight, 6.8% obese, and the prevalence of SLD was 19.6%. Students with steatosis had higher BMI and low level of physical exercise. Significant positive correlations were found between CAP and LSM with BMI.


Conclusion: Our findings highlight a high prevalence of steatosis (19.6%) in healthy young individuals, emphasising the need for early diagnosis and targeted lifestyle interventions to address modifiable factors like higher BMI and low physical activity.

Abstract 83 | pdf Downloads 59

References

1. Kaya E, Demir D, Alahdab YO, Yilmaz Y. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in apparently healthy medical students: a transient elastography study on the basis of a controlled attenuation parameter. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2016 Nov 1;28(11)1264-7.
2. Yang Z, Li A, Jiang Y, Maidaiti X, Wu Y, Jin Y. Global burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease attributable to high fasting plasma glucose in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021. Sci Rep 2024 Sep 27;14(1)22232.
3. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Ann Hepatol 2024 Jan-Feb;29(1)101133.
4. Israelsen, M, Francque S, Tsochatzis EA, Krag A. Steatotic liver disease. Lancet 2024;404(10323), 1761-78.
5. Tomah S, Hamdy O, Abuelmagd MM, Hassan AH, Alkhouri N, Al-Badri MR, Gardner H, Eldib AH, Eid EA. Prevalence of and risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and fibrosis among young adults in Egypt. BMJ open Gastroenterol 2021 Oct 1;8(1)e000780.
6. Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;1511–20.
7. Obika M, Noguchi H. Diagnosis and evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Exp Diabetes Res 2012; 2012145754.
8. Campbell MS, Reddy KR. Review article: the evolving role of liver biopsy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20249–259.
9. Roldan-Valadez E, Favila R, Martínez-López M, Uribe M, Méndez- Sánchez N. Imaging techniques for assessing hepatic fat content in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Hepatol 2008; 7212–220.
10. Schwenzer NF, Springer F, Schraml C, Stefan N, Machann J, Schick F. Non-invasive assessment and quantification of liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. J Hepatol 2009; 51433–445.
11. Duseja A, Singh SP, De A, Madan K, Rao PN, Shukla A, et al. Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) Guidance Paper on nomenclature, diagnosis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Mar-Apr;13. Epub 2022 Dec 7 PMID 36950481; PMCID PMC10025685.
12. Kinner S, Reeder SB, Yokoo T. Quantitative imaging biomarkers of NAFLD. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 611337–1347.
13. Sasso M, Beaugrand M, de Ledinghen V, Douvin C, Marcellin P, Poupon R, et al. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a novel VCTE guided ultrasonic attenuation measurement for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis: preliminary study and validation in a coh. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 361825–1835.
14. Karlas T, Petroff D, Sasso M, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) technology for assessing steatosis. J Hepatol 2017;661022–30.
15. Wong VW-S, Vergniol J, Wong GL-H, et al. Diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol 2010;51454–62.
16. Hernaez R, Lazo M, Bonekamp S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: A meta-analysis. Hepatol 2011;54(3)1082-90.
17. Abeysekera KWM, Fernandes GS, Hammerton G, et al. Prevalence of steatosis and fibrosis in young adults in the UK: a population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:295–305.
18. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, et al. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta- analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatol 2016;6473–84.
19. Okur G, Karacaer Z. The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in healthy young persons. North Clin Istanbul 2016;3(2)111-117.
20. Nastasa R, Stanciu C, Zenovia S, Singeap AM, Cojocariu C, Sfarti C, Girleanu I, Chiriac S, Cuciureanu T, Huiban L, Muzica CM. The prevalence of liver steatosis and fibrosis assessed by vibration-controlled transient elastography and controlled attenuation. . Diagnostics 2021 Dec 13;11(12)2341-2351.
21. Leslie T, Pawloski L, Kallman-Price J, et al. Survey of health status, nutrition and geography of food selection of chronic liver disease patients. Ann Hepatol 2014;13533–40.
22. Kallwitz ER, Daviglus ML, Allison MA, et al. Prevalence of suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in hispanic/latino individuals differs by heritage. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13569–76.
22. Yang Z, Li A, Jiang Y, Maidaiti X, Wu Y, Jin Y. Global burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease attributable to high fasting plasma glucose in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021. Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22232.
23. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Ann Hepatol. 2024 Jan-Feb;29(1):101133.
24. Duseja A, Singh SP, De A, Madan K, Rao PN, Shukla A, et al. Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) Guidance Paper on nomenclature, diagnosis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Mar-Apr;13(2):273-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.11.014. Epub 2022 Dec 7. PMID: 36950481; PMCID: PMC10025685.