ACCEPTABILITY, RETENTION AND SATISFACTION OF POST-PLACENTAL INSERTION OF INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Post-partum Intrauterine Device, Efficacy, Acceptability
Abstract
Background: PPIUCD has emerged as the best choice to avoid the missed opportunity of contraceptive practices in a population that is in dire need of family planning as the intrauterine contraceptives have defied apathy, unjustified judgment, negative publicity, and apathy once more to emerge as a safe and effective form of birth control. Preventing conception with an IUCD is one of the oldest techniques of contraception.
Objective: To determine the frequency of acceptability, retention and satisfaction of immediate insertion of post-placental intrauterine contraceptive device
Material & Methods
Study Design: Descriptive case series
Setting: Unit I, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Central Park Teaching hospital, Lahore
Duration: 06 months i.e. 26-12-2022 to 26-6-2023
Data collection: 300 females were enrolled after delivery and informed consent was taken for placement of PPIUCD. CuT 380A was placed and acceptability was noted. Then all females were followed up in OPD and after 6 months of insertion, they were called for assessment of PPIUCD presence. If PPIUCD was in its correct position, then retention was labeled.
Results: The average age of the females was 29.43±6.55 years, 63(21%) were nulliparous. The acceptability of PPIUCD was noted in 70(23.33%); efficacy in 67(95.7%), and satisfaction was observed in 65 (92.9%) participants.
Conclusion: According to this study acceptability of PPIUD was observed in almost one-fourth of the females. PPIUD is efficacious and proven to have high satisfaction among females.
References
2. Moore Z, Pfitzer A, Gubin R, et al. Missed opportunities for family planning: an analysis of pregnancy risk and contraceptive method use among postpartum women in 21 low-and middle. Elsevier. Accessed May 28, 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782415001018
3. Cwiak C, Cordes S. Postpartum intrauterine device placement: a patient-friendly option. Contracept Reprod Med. 2018;3(1). doi:10.1186/S40834-018-0057-X
4. Reproduction KRJ of, Contraception undefined, and O, 2015 undefined. Comparative evaluation of postpartum versus post MTP insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. ejmcr.com. 2015;4(1):2320-1789. doi:10.5455/2320- 1770.ijrcog20150204
5. Nayak A, OF MJIJ, 2017 undefined. Experience on awareness, acceptability, safety, efficacy, complications and expulsion of post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. galaxyjeevandhara.com. Accessed May 28, 2023. http://galaxyjeevandhara.com/index.php/ijss/article/view/684
6. Mohamed S, Kamel M, … OSM principles and, 2003 undefined. Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: Assiut experience. karger.com. Accessed May 28, 2023. https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/70754
7. Chi IC, Farr G. Postpartum IUD contraception - a review of an international experience. Adv Contracept. 1989;5(3):127-146. doi:10.1007/BF01849356
8. Tatum H, Beltran R, Ramos R, … HVKA journal of, 1996 undefined. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study. Elsevier. Accessed May 28, 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937896700339
9. Gupta A, Verma A, Obstet JCIJRC, 2013 undefined. Evaluation of PPIUCD
versus interval IUCD (380A) insertion in a teaching hospital of Western UP. academia.edu. Accessed May 28, 2023. https://www.academia.edu/download/67711885/d6e81353d1edccb450f0e84ae7b 2fa3db1b4.pdf
10. Çelen Ş, Möröy P, Sucak A, Aktulay A, Contraception ND, 2004 undefined. Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Elsevier. Accessed May 28, 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782403003470
11. Çelen Ş, Sucak A, Yıldız Y, Contraception ND, 2011 undefined. Immediate postplacental insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device during cesarean section. Elsevier. Accessed May 28, 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782411000072
12. Katheit G, Gynecol JAIJRCO, 2013 undefined. Evaluation of post-placental intrauterine device (PPIUCD) in terms of awareness, acceptance, and expulsion in a tertiary care centre. academia.edu. Accessed May 28, 2023. https://www.academia.edu/download/83303803/23121f9448f9bf7e9a64ac5d110c d2e78703.pdf
13. Gupta S, Bansal R, Shergill HK, Sharma P, Garg P. Correlates of Post-Partum Intra-Uterine Copper-T Devices (PPIUCD) Acceptability and Retention: An Observational Study from North India. Published online 2021. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-798931/v1
14. Kaur M, Kaur A, Mohi M, … SKGPJ of, 2019 undefined. Acceptability of Post Partum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device among Parturients at a Tertiary Care Centre, Patiala. jrme.gmcpatiala.edu.in. 2019;19(2). Accessed May 28, 2023. https://jrme.gmcpatiala.edu.in/index.php/j/article/view/54
15. Gudi SN, Sachdeva J, Manchanda R, et al. A Prospective Multi-centric Study of Acceptance, Insertion and Follow-Up of Postpartum Insertions of IUCD. J Obstet Gynecol India. Published online 2023. doi:10.1007/S13224-022-01738-4
16. Marchin A, Moss A, and MHJ of women’s health, 2021 undefined. A meta-
analysis of postpartum Copper IUD continuation rates in low-and middle-income countries. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Accessed May 28, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046022/
17. Nalini N, Singh B, Jha S, Singh A. Acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device. Published online 2022. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1392_22
18. Drey E, Reeves M, Ogawa D, Contraception AS, 2009 undefined. Insertion of intrauterine contraceptives immediately following first-and second-trimester abortions. Elsevier. Accessed May 28, 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782408005490
19. Jain N, Reproduction NAIJ of, Contraception undefined, 2017 undefined. Acceptability, continuation and satisfaction of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) and delayed insertion: a comparative study. go.gale.com. Accessed May 28, 2023. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA534838729&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1 &it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=23201770&p=AONE&sw=w
20. Iftikhar P, Shaheen N, Arora E, Cureus PI, 2019 undefined. Efficacy and satisfaction rate in postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: a prospective study. cureus.com. doi:10.7759/cureus.5646
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dr. Fatima Inayat
Consultant Gynae/Obs, Bhatti Hospital
Dr. Robina Naureen
Associate Professor Gynae/Obs, Central Park Teaching Hospital
Dr. Tehimna Zafar
Assistant Professor Gynae/Obs, Central Park Teaching Hospital
Dr. Rubeena Badar
Assistant Professor Gynae/Obs, Central Park Teaching Hospital
Dr. Mussarat Siddiqui
Consultant Gynae/Obs, Banu Saeed Hospital Dharanwala
Dr. Anam Bashir
Senior Registrar Gynae/Obs, Central Park Teaching Hospital
Dr. Tayyaba Majeed
Professor & HOD Gynae/Obs, Central Park Teaching Hospital