SEGMENTECTOMY FOR LUNG NODULES: OUR EXPERIENCE AT AN ONCOLOGY CENTER IN SOUTH INDIA

Main Article Content

Vijayaraj s Patil
Harish kumar H
Sai Nagasri
Prakash BV
Srinivas
Altaf syed

Keywords

Lung segmentectomy, sublobar resection, lung nodules, thoracic surgery, VATS, oncology, India, postoperative outcome

Abstract

Background: Lung segmentectomy is a sublobar resection technique increasingly considered for select lung nodules, including primary lung cancer. However, data on segmentectomy in the Indian population remain sparse. This study presents our experience with segmentectomy at a cancer center in South India.


Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent segmentectomy for lung nodules between January 2021 and August 2024. Patients undergoing multi-organ resection or with poor pulmonary reserves were excluded. Data on surgical approach (open vs. VATS), intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, histopathology, and oncological follow-up were analyzed.


Results: A total of 24 segmentectomies were performed, with a median patient age of 52 years and a median nodule size of 2 cm. VATS was used in 9 cases, with 3 conversions to open surgery. The median surgical duration was 140 minutes, with a mean blood loss of 100 mL. The median intercostal drainage duration was 3 days. Postoperative complications included hemoptysis (11 cases, managed conservatively) and air leaks (3 cases, managed with suction devices). No Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or 4 complications were observed. Histological evaluation revealed a range of pathologies, including adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, and metastatic lesions. On follow-up, three patients with malignant disease developed distant metastases.


Conclusion: Segmentectomy is a safe and effective option for lung nodules of varied etiology, with minimal morbidity and acceptable short-term oncological outcomes. This study highlights the feasibility of segmentectomy in the Indian population and underscores the need for further research into segmental lung anatomy and surgical training.

Abstract 192 | pdf Downloads 91

References

1. Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, Nakajima R, Suzuki K, Aokage K, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2022;399(10335):1607–17.
2. Altorki N, Wang X, Kozono D, Watt C, Landrenau R, Wigle D, et al. Lobar or sublobar resection for peripheral stage IA non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(6):489–98.
3. Nomori H, Okada M. Illustrated anatomical segmentectomy for lung cancer. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
4. Xu Y, Qin Y, Ma D, Liu H. The impact of segmentectomy versus lobectomy on pulmonary function in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;17(1):107.
5. Yendamuri S. Thoracic surgery in India: challenges and opportunities. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(Suppl 8):S596.
6. Sharma S, Sharma G. Medical education in India. Ann Natl Acad Med Sci India. 2017;53(04):179–93.
7. Gooseman MR, Brunelli A, Chaudhuri N, Milton R, Tcherveniakov P, Papagiannopoulos K, et al. Prolonged air leak after segmentectomy: incidence and risk factors. J Thorac Dis. 2022;15(2):858.