DETAILED MORPHOLOGY OF MAXILLARY FIRST PREMOLARS FOLLOWING ORTHODONTIC EXTRACTION
Main Article Content
Keywords
Morphology, maxilla, orthodontics, premolar, bicuspid, root.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the morphological variations in orthodonticaly extracted maxillary first premolars.
Method: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the ‘Department of Oral Biology at Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, from June 15, 2022, to December 15, 2022’. Following ethical approval, a total of 207 maxillary first premolars from individuals of both genders aged 18 and above were examined. The teeth were categorized into four groups based on root morphology. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (version 21).
Results: Among the 207 patients, 104 were female, and 103 were male, with an average age of 32.02 years (ranging from 18 to 55 years) and a standard deviation of 13.45 years. Bifurcated teeth were the most common, accounting for 42.05% of cases, followed by laminated teeth at 30.43% and single-rooted teeth at 23.18%. Only 4.34% of the patients had teeth with three roots.
Conclusion: Bifurcated andlaminated roots in maxillary first premolars are more common in our population. Morphology of maxillary first premolar shows great variation in their root configuration in different ethnicities.
References
2. Kapila S, Kaur T, Bhullar RS, Sandhu A, Dhawan A, Kaur A. Use of physics forceps in atraumatic orthodontic extractions of bilateral premolars: A randomized control clinical study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020.; 19(3):347-354.
3. Araujo MT, Caldas DL. Tooth extractions in orthodontics: First or second premolars? Dental Press J. orthod. 2019; 24(3):88-98.
4. Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R, et al. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computedvtomography. Int endodont j. 2012; 45(11):996- 1003.
5. Al-Shehri S, Al-Nazhan S, Shoukry S, Al-Shwaimi E, Al-Shemmery B. Root and canal configuration of the maxillary first molar in a Saudi subpopulation: A cone-beam computed tomography study Saudi Endod J. 2017;7:69–76.
6. Khan M, Khan RM, Javed MQ, Ahmed A. Root canal configuration of the mesio-buccal root of maxillary first permanent molars in local population JIIMC. 2018;13:210–14
7. Ahmad IA, Alenezi MA. Root and root canal morphology of maxillary first premolars: A literature review and clinical considerations J Endod. 2016;42:861–72
8. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures Endod Top. 2005;10:3–29.
9. Nazeer MR, Khan FR, Ghafoor R. Evaluation of root morphology and canal configuration of maxillary premolars in a sample of Pakistani population by using cone beam computed tomography J Pak Med Assoc. 2018;68:423–7.
10. Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Al-Dahman Y, Alnassar F, Al-Jebaly A, Alsubait S. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars in a saudi population Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:8170620.
11. Hanif F, Ahmed A, Javed MQ, Khan ZJ, Ulfat H. Frequency of root canal configurations of maxillary premolars as assessed by cone-beam computerized tomography scans in the Pakistani subpopulation. Saudi Endod J. 2022;12(1):100-105.
12. Allawi S, Madarati AA, Al-Tayyan M. Evaluation of roots and root canals’ morphology of maxillary premolars in a Syrian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography. Saudi Endod J. 2023;13(2):168-76.
13. Faraj BM, Abdulrahman MS, Faris TM. Visual inspection of root patterns and radiographic estimation of its canal configurations by confirmation using sectioning method. An ex vivo study on maxillary first premolar teeth. BMC Ora HeaL. 2022;22(1):166-8.
14. Gündüz H, Özlek E. Evaluation of Root Morphology and Root Canal Configuration of Mandibular and Maxillary Premolar Teeth In Turkish Subpopulation By Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. East J Med. 2022;27(3)64-9.
15. Alsaket YM, El-Ma’aita AM, Aqrabawi J, Alhadidi A. Prevalence and Configuration of the Second Mesiobuccal Canal in the Permanent Maxillary First Molar in Jordanian Population Sample. Iran Endod J. 2020;15(4):217-21.
16. Wu D, Hu DQ, Xin BC, Sun DG, Ge ZP, Su JY. Root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular first premolars analyzed using cone-beam computed tomography in a Shandong Chinese population. Med. 2020;99(20):111-6.
17. Liu X, Gao M, Bai Q, Ruan J, Lu Q. Evaluation of palatal furcation groove and root canal anatomy of maxillary first premolar: A CBCT and micro-CT study. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021-5.
18. Liu X, Gao M, Ruan J, Lu Q. Root canal anatomy of maxillary first premolar by microscopic computed tomography in a Chinese adolescent subpopulation. BioMed Res Int.2019;201-9.
19. Pan JY, Parolia A, Chuah SR, Bhatia S, Mutalik S, Pau A. Root canal morphology of permanent teeth in a Malaysian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC ora heal. 2019;19(1):1-5.
20. AlRahabi MK, Ghabbani HM. Endodontic management of a three-rooted maxillary premolar: A case report. JTUMS. 2019;14(3):312-6.
21. Mahore D, Alam S, Mishra SK, Kumar A. Endodontic management of three rooted maxillary first premolar and presence of an associated three rooted second premolar. UJDS. 2020;6(1):64-6.
22. Buchanan GD, Gamieldien MY, Tredoux S, Vally ZI. Root and canal configurations of maxillary premolars in a South African subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography and two classification systems. J Ora Sci. 2020;62(1):93-7.