EXPLORING MORPHOLOGY OF MAXILLARY WISDOM TEETH USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING

Main Article Content

Dr Asma Ali
Dr Rozi Afsar
Dr Farhan Dil
Dr Umar Nasir
Dr Arbab Zia-ur-Rehman
Dr Mahwish Nowshad
Dr Hamdan Adil
Dr Arbab Shahkar Hamid

Keywords

Cusps, roots, molar, morphology, maxilla, cone beam computed tomography,

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore morphology of maxillary wisdom teeth using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging.


Study design: Descriptive study


Place and duration of study: Study was done in Oral Biology department, Rehman college of Dentistry, Peshawar, from 15th July 2022 till 15th January 2023.


Materials and methods: 120 patients between 18 and 60 years of age were included in this study. Cone beam computed tomography images were studied for type of cusps and roots of maxillary 3rd molars. SPSS version-26 was used for analysis.


Results: Results showed 69 females and 51 males. Mean age of patients was 32 years, ranging from 18-55 years with a standard deviation of 13.46 years. Most of the maxillary 3rd molars were tricuspid (33.33%), followed by fourcuspid (32.5%) and teeth with enamel projections (29.12%).  Teeth with five cups were rare (5%). Most of teeth had single roots (51.66%) followed by three roots (34.16%) and bifid roots (10.83%). Teeth with four roots were rare (3.35%). None of the teeth showed sinus approximation.


Conclusion: Maxillary 3rd molars show great variation from three cusps to four cusps and even teeth without cusps are present. Type of roots also vary from single roots to multiple roots.


 

Abstract 125 | PDF Downloads 15

References

1. Qureshi AA, Bakri MM. Comparative study of local anesthetic efficacy of 5% tramadol versus 2% Lignocaine with 1: 100,000 adrenaline for extraction of fully erupted maxillary 3rd molars using infiltration anesthesia. Saud Den J. 2022;34 (4):306-9.
2. Ye ZX, Qian WH, Wu YB, Yang C. Buccal rotation for wholly impacted maxillary third molar extraction. Head & Face Med. 2023;19(1):1-6.
3. Anter E, Helaly Y, Samir W. Assessment of proximity of maxillary molars roots to the maxillary sinus floor in a sample from the Egyptian population using cone-beam computed tomography (hospital based study). Egyp Den J. 2019;65(4):3427-38.
4. MUNIR B, AHMAD S, IQBAL S, LODHI SK, AKRAM SM. NUMBER OF ROOT CANALS IN MAXILLARY THIRD MOLARS ANALYZED IN A SELECTED PAKISTANI POPULATION. I J M D. 2022;26(2):36-9.
5. Dhillon JK, Ghosh S, Mathur VP. Root canal morphology of primary molars–A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2022;33(1):14-6.
6. Parupalli K, Solomon RV, Karteek BS, Polasa S. Application of cone-beam computed tomography in the analysis and management of intricate internal anatomy of hyper-and mesotaurodontic teeth. JCD. 2020;23(2):211-6
7. Waseem N, Asim MA, Maqsood A, Ghafoor MW, Khalid MO. Evaluation of patterns of impacted third molars and their association with vital structures by radiographic examination. P A F M J. 2021;71(1):255-60.
8. Lin Y, Xiang Y, Chen X, Wang H, Cao N, Xu X et al. Z. Multiple root canals in the maxillary molar: an unusual case report. BMC oral health. 2021;21(1):1-6.
9. Kavas AA, Tümen EC. Volumetric pulp chambers measurements in mandibular and maxillary permanent first molar using cone-beam computed tomography by age and gender. International Dental Research. 2019;9(1):30-40.
10. Khater ST, Fouad DA, Ahmed DF. Assessment of Relationship between Maxillary Sinus Floor and Maxillary Posterior Teeth Root Tips Position in a Sample of Egyptian Population using CBCT: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. A D J. 2024;6(1):122-38.
11. Bhavyaa R, Sujitha P, Muthu MS, Nirmal L, Patil SS. Prevalence of the Cusp of Carabelli: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann of Hum Biol. 2021;48(7-8):572-84.
12. Park JH, Kim Y, Park JH, Lee NK, Kim SH, Kook YA. Long-term evaluation of maxillary molar position after distalization using modified C-palatal plates in patients with and without second molar eruption. A J O D O. 2021;160(6):853-61.
13. Shashidhar K, Castelino CK, Kuttappa MN, Nair RA, Soans CR, Nair HS. Third molar angulation changes in class II div I malocclusion subjects treated with extraction of four premolars: A retrospective study. J I S P C D. 2020;10(5):591-2
14. Pan F, Yang Z, Wang J, Cai R, Liu J, Zhang C, Liao W. Influence of orthodontic treatment with premolar extraction on the spatial position of maxillary third molars in adult patients: a retrospective cohort cone-bean computed tomography study. BMC Ora Heal. 2020;20:1-8.
15. Baik UB, Jung JY, Jung HJ, Kim YJ, Chae HS, Park KS et al. Alveolar bone changes after molar protraction in young adults with missing mandibular second premolars or first molars. Ang Orthodon. 2022;92(1):64-72.
16. Oda M, Nishida I, Habu M, Takahashi O, Tabe S, Tsurushima H et al. Imaging peculiarities of gubernaculum tracts in molars as accessional teeth on CT. C E D R. 2021;7(6):1205-14.
17. Lee YJ, Kook YA, Park JH, Park J, Bayome M, Vaid NR, Kim Y. Short-term cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of maxillary third molar changes after total arch distalization in adolescents.A JO D O. 2019;155(2):191-7.
18. Bhatt P, Gupta H, Mathur H, Porwal A. Gemination mandibular third molar–A rare case with use of CBCT in diagnosis and treatment planning. J I A O M R. 2019;31(4):377-81.
19. Shafiq N, Khan D, Majid T, Afridi S, Aleem S, Kanwal S. VARIATION OF CUSPS AND ROOTS OF UPPER WISDOM TOOTH IN PATIENTS VISITING KHYBER COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY. J K C D. 2021;11(04):40-3.
20. Lupoi D, Dragomir M, Coada G, Sanda A, Budu V. CT scan evaluation of the distance between maxillary sinus floor and maxillary teeth apices. Roman J Rhino. 2021;1(41):18-23.
21. Qiao X, Xu T, Chen L, Yang D. Analysis of root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth in Guizhou, China. Medical Science Monitor: I M J E C R. 2021;27:758-61.
22. Mirza MB, Gufran K, Alhabib O, Alafraa O, Alzahrani F, Abuelqomsan MS et al. CBCT based study to analyze and classify root canal morphology of maxillary molars-A retrospective study. E R M P S. 2022;26(18):367-9.
23. Koshy SJ. Madhulaxmi. Comparison Of The Clinical Efficacy Of Two different Extraction Techniques In The Removal Of Impacted Maxillary Third Molar. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(04):2172-5.
24. Abu-Ta’a MF. Maxillary sinuses, multiple aspects to consider prior to bone grafting procedure: a retrospective study in a sample of a Palestinian population. Oral Radiol. 2024;40(1):21-9.