ROLE OF MRI IN EVALUATION OF ACUTE VISUAL SYMPTOMS-AN INSTITUTIONAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:
- To define and analyze MRI findings for characterization of various lesions causing acute visual syndromes(AVS).
- To diagnose lesions based on the MRI findings by correlating with provided clinical
- To correlate the MRI diagnosis with final
MATERIALS & METHODS:
- This study was conducted in Department of Radiology and Imageology at Nizam’s institute of medical The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. This is a prospective study, conducted over a period of 17 months (December 2022-April 2024)
- This study included 47 patients irrespective of their age who presented with symptoms and signs of acute visual syndromes underwent MR imaging features of various lesions were evaluated. The provided relevant clinical data was collected from the patients was reviewed. MRI diagnosis was given based on the imaging characteristics and provided clinical data.
- Possible explanation was drawn to explain the symptoms and treatment response based on MRI features. The imaging features were correlated with final
RESULTS
- The overall mean age of the study population is 5 years with most commonly observed age group 40-50 years. We observed male preponderance in this study with maximum number of both males and females in inflammatory lesions. Inflammatory lesions were most prevalent in this study contributing to 47.8% (n=23) followed by space occupying and vascular lesions (19.5%, n=9), infections (17.3%, n=8) and miscellaneous lesions (Idiopathic intra cranial hyper tension(IIH) & posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome) (15.1%, n=7).
- Overall most common pathology was optic neuritis(1) contributing to 32 %(n=15) of the study population followed by Tolosa hunt syndrome (12.7%. n=6), pituitary macro adenoma (8.5%, n=4), posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) (8.5%, n=4), tuberculosis (8.5%, n=4), fungal infections (6.3%, n=3), idiopathic intracranial hypertension (6.3%, n=3), sarcoidosis (4.2%, n=2), suprasellar pilocytic astrocytoma (2.1%. n=1) and left cavernous ICA aneurysm (2.1%, n=1).
- Out of 47 patients MRI detected abnormality in 41 patients (87%). MRI could not detect the pathology in 6 patients (12.7%), all these were patients of optic neuritis. The given single specific diagnosis based on MRI was correlated with final diagnosis in 37 patients (78%), two differential diagnoses were given in four (8.5%) Out four patients first differential diagnosis was correlated with final diagnosis in three patients, second differential diagnosis was correlated with final diagnosis in one patient of pilocytic astrocytoma. In this study the overall sensitivity of MRI in detecting the lesions causing acute visual syndromes is 88.67% whereas specificity is 100%. Except for optic neuritis sensitivity and specificity of MRI in detecting the lesions is 100%.
Conclusion
- Conclusion of the present study is that while the symptomatology of acute visual syndrome is often nonspecific and confusing, MRI imaging adds sensitivity and specificity to the physical Because of its better soft tissue resolution, characteristic signal intensity pattern of certain lesions and lack of ionizing radiation hazards, MRI should be the imaging modality of choice for patients .
References
1. Petzold A, Wattjes MP, Costello F, Flores-Rivera J, Fraser CL, Fujihara K et al. The investigation of acute optic neuritis: a review and proposed protocol. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2014 Aug;10(8):447.
2. Balcer LJ, Miller DH, Reingold SC, Cohen JA. Vision and vision-related outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2014 Nov 27;138(1):11-27.
3. Petzold A, Plant GT. Diagnosis and classification of autoimmune optic neuropathy. Autoimmunity reviews. 2014 Apr 1;13(4-5):539-45.
4. Mukhi SV, Lincoln CM. MRI in the evaluation of acute visual syndromes. Topics in magnetic resonance imaging. 2015 Dec 1;24(6):309-24.
5. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T Et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015 Jul 14;85(2):177-89.
6. Bodanapally UK, Shanmuganathan K, Shin RK, Dreizin D, Katzman L, Reddy RP, Mascarenhas D. Hyperintense optic nerve due to diffusion restriction: diffusion- weighted imaging in traumatic optic neuropathy. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2015 Aug 1;36(8):1536-41.
7. Sánchez RV, Lopez-Rueda A, Olarte AM, San LR. MRI findings in Tolosa-Hunt syndrome (THS). BMJ case reports. 2014 Nov;2014.
8. Smith JK, Matheus MG, Castillo M. Imaging manifestations of neurosarcoidosis. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2004 Feb;182(2):289-95.
2. Balcer LJ, Miller DH, Reingold SC, Cohen JA. Vision and vision-related outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2014 Nov 27;138(1):11-27.
3. Petzold A, Plant GT. Diagnosis and classification of autoimmune optic neuropathy. Autoimmunity reviews. 2014 Apr 1;13(4-5):539-45.
4. Mukhi SV, Lincoln CM. MRI in the evaluation of acute visual syndromes. Topics in magnetic resonance imaging. 2015 Dec 1;24(6):309-24.
5. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T Et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015 Jul 14;85(2):177-89.
6. Bodanapally UK, Shanmuganathan K, Shin RK, Dreizin D, Katzman L, Reddy RP, Mascarenhas D. Hyperintense optic nerve due to diffusion restriction: diffusion- weighted imaging in traumatic optic neuropathy. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2015 Aug 1;36(8):1536-41.
7. Sánchez RV, Lopez-Rueda A, Olarte AM, San LR. MRI findings in Tolosa-Hunt syndrome (THS). BMJ case reports. 2014 Nov;2014.
8. Smith JK, Matheus MG, Castillo M. Imaging manifestations of neurosarcoidosis. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2004 Feb;182(2):289-95.