TREATMENT RESPONSE EVALUATION OF THE INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY IN CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children and represents 75–80% of acute leukemia in this age group. The likelihood of long-term cure in ALL depends on the clinical and laboratory features and the treatment received. The initial response to the induction chemotherapy is one of the most important prognostic marker & future guide to the management options.
Aims & Objectives: To assess response of the induction chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Patients & Methods: We have retrospectively evaluated the 101 diagnosed cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in our hospital from 2013 to 2016 and analyzed the response of standard induction chemotherapy (MRCALL97) after 28 day by bone marrow biopsy.
Results: Out of 101, 16 (15.85%) patients died due to infective and hemorrhagic complications and could not complete the induction therapy. Out of 85, there were 52 (61.2%) male & 33 (32.8%) female patients. Mean age of the patients was 10.16. ± 4.87 years and the age ranges between 01-18 years. Mean white blood cell (WBC) counts & the mean blast cell percent at diagnoses was 39.2 + 60.88/microlitre and 71.7 + 21.2% respectively. 63 (74.1%) patients have blast cells above 50% & 22 (25.9%) patients with blast cells below 50% noted. 9 (10.6%) patient’s shows CNS involvement at initial workup. Post chemotherapy bone marrow biopsy on day 28 shows complete remission (CR) in 65 (76.47%) patients including 42(64.6%) male and 23 (35.4%) female. induction failure occurred in 20 (23.5%) patients including 10 (50%) male and 10 (50%) female. All 9 patients with CNS involvement at presentation could not achieve complete remission.
Conclusions: This study contributes to a better understanding of the factors influencing induction chemotherapy outcomes and highlights areas for future research and clinical practice improvements.
References
2. Yasmeen N, Ashraf S. Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia; Epidemiology and Clinicopathological Features. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Mar;59(3):150–3.
3. George P, Hernandez K, Hustu O, Borella L, Holton C, Pinkel D. A study of “total therapy” of acute lymphocytic leukemia in children. J Pediatr. 1968;72:399–408.
4. Möricke A, Reiter A, Zimmermann M, Gadner H, Stanulla M, Dördelmann M, et al. Risk-adjusted therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia can decrease treatment burden and improve survival: treatment results of 2169 unselected pediatric and adolescent patients enrolled in the trial ALL-BFM 95. Blood. 2008;111:4477–89.
5. Hunger SP, Lu X, Devidas M, Camitta BM, Gaynon PS, Winick NJ, et al. Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1663–9.
6. Donadieu J, Hill C. Early response to chemotherapy as a prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a methodological review. Br J Haematol. 2001 Oct;115(1):34–45.
7. Pui CH, Evans WE. A 50-year journey to cure childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2013 Jul;50(3):185–96.
8. Rana ZA, Rabbani MW, Sheikh MA, Khan AA. Outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia after induction therapy--3 years experience at a single paediatric oncology centre. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009 Oct-Dec;21(4):150–3.
9. Magrath I, Shanta V, Advani S, Adde M, Arya LS, Banavali S, et al. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in countries with limited resources; lessons from use of a single protocol in India over a twenty year period. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Jul;41(11):1570–83.
10. Ribeiro RC, Steliarova-Foucher E, Magrath I, et al. Baseline status of paediatric oncology care in ten low-income or mid-income countries receiving My Child Matters support: a descriptive study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:721–9.
11. 11.Conter V, Aricò M, Basso G, et al. Long-term results of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP) Studies 82, 87, 88, 91 and 95 for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2010;24(2):255–64.
12. Möricke A, Zimmermann M, Reiter A, et al. Long-term results of five consecutive trials in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia performed by the ALL-BFM study group from 1981 to 2000. Leukemia. 2010;24(2):265–84.
13. Hunger SP, Lu X, Devidas M, et al. Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia from 1990-2005: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1663–9.
14. Conter V, Aricò M, Basso G, et al. Long-term results of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP) Studies 82, 87, 88, 91 and 95 for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2010;24(2):255–64.
15. 15.Oudot C, Auclerc MF, Levy V, Porcher R, Piguet C, Perel Y, et al. Prognostic factors for leukemic induction failure in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and outcome after salvage therapy: The FRALLE 93 study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1496–503.
16. 16. Miller DR, Leikin S, Albo V, Vitale L, Sather H, Coccia P, et al. Use of prognostic factors in improving the design and efficiency of clinical trials in childhood leukemia: Children's Cancer Study Group Report. Cancer Treat Rep. 1980;64:381–92.
17. 17. Miller DR, Coccia PF, Bleyer WA, Lukens JN, Siegel SE, Sather HN, et al. Early response to induction therapy as a predictor of disease-free survival and late recurrence of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from Children's Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:1807–15.